1 / 7

QoR paper for GoSP

QoR paper for GoSP. J ános Tapolcai , Tibor Cinkler. QoS. Delay Jitter BER Traffic load. QoR. Acceptability. 1-A. A. The service is available. The service is unacceptable. The service is acceptable. Emergency service. The service is unavailable. The service state model.

brede
Download Presentation

QoR paper for GoSP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. QoR paper for GoSP János Tapolcai, Tibor Cinkler NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,13thJune 2005

  2. QoS • Delay • Jitter • BER • Traffic load QoR • Acceptability 1-A A The service is available The service is unacceptable The service is acceptable Emergency service The service is unavailable The service state model NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,13thJune 2005

  3. 0.99324·d(0) tp ti ts tr protection reparation re-route interruption restoration Short QoS degra-dations IP restoration mechanism Reparation by the staff Shared protection mechanism At f(0) the service is acceptable Downtime PDF NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,13thJune 2005

  4. A characterisation of the different QoS and QoR parameters QoR QoS User Application layer Principal QoR parameters SLA Codec FEC, CRC Acceptability, Un-acceptability for a Given Time Period, Mean Up Time, Mean Down Time, Mean Time to Repair, Mean Time Between Failures Packet Loss Probability, Jitter, Delay (operational phase) Service Provider e.g.: “IP restoration” Mean Time to Recover, Lost traffic, Mean Time to Repair, Mean Time Between Failures Hop Count, Delay, Traffic Load Service layer negotiated Multiple failures, Cost of recovery, resilience mechanism Cost, Available bandwidth Total physical bandwidth k-connected, Signal propagation delays Physical Resources (planning phase) non- negotiated Transport layer NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,13thJune 2005

  5. User A mapping of principal QoR parameters are performed Service SLA: QoS, principal QoR Resources Resources Resources/User Service SLA: QoS, QoR Resources Resources A general hierarchical model of QoR NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,13thJune 2005

  6. Emergency Class telemedicine applications Strict QoR Bank transfers, transaction data Conversational Class Video conferencing VoIP Streaming Class Prioritized Elastic Class Streaming media e-mails or ftp traffic Best Effort Class Loose QoR Loose QoS Strict QoS The QoS and QoR requirements of applications NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,13thJune 2005

  7. Future work • Finalize the paper for GOSP Workshop 2005 (Broadnets) • These slides can be included in the DRCN Tutorial • Much-More simulation results • Multiple failures • Multilayer architecture • Improve the paper to submit to Infocom NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,13thJune 2005

More Related