1 / 15

Auteur ou Service

Direct and delegated management in provincial urban public transport in France in 2003 Using the urban public transport database. Auteur ou Service. T. GOUIN. 2 décembre 2002. 7th Sep 2005. Analysis Observation Methodology. Certu’s work on contracts.

brendy
Download Presentation

Auteur ou Service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Direct and delegated managementin provincial urban public transportin France in 2003Using the urban public transport database Auteur ou Service T. GOUIN 2 décembre 2002 7th Sep 2005

  2. Analysis Observation Methodology Certu’s work on contracts

  3. Cooperation between Certu / DTT / GART / UTP Technical, financial and legal data Main legal data available Legal status of the organizing authority and the company Type of management Type of contract Type of procedure used Date of signature and term of the contract Affiliation with a larger company Limits The urban public transport database

  4. Type of management direct delegated 10% Progression 1997 - 2003 250 200 150 Number of networks 100 50 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

  5. Type of management 22 58 57 direct 35 30 delegated Marseille 20% 5 9 5 2 1 19 / 22 Distribution by size of network for 2003 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Less than 20 000 20 to 50 000 50 to 100 000 100 to 200 000 More than 200 000

  6. Type of contract Who takes… the commercial risk ? the industrial risk ? delegation OA OA • Management contract OA Operator • Gross cost contract Operator Operator • Net cost contract

  7. Type of contract 250 200 Net cost contracts 150 Gross cost contracts Number of networks 100 Management contracts 50 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Progression 1997 - 2003

  8. Type of contract 1 2 100% 80% Net cost contracts 60% Gross cost contracts 40% Management contracts 20% 0% Less than 20 000 20 to 50 000 50 to 100 000 100 to 200 000 More than 200 000 Distribution by size of network in 2003

  9. Type of contract 70 45 Networks 60 40 Travels 35 50 Net cost contracts 30 40 25 % Gross cost contracts Number of networks 20 30 15 Management contracts 20 10 5 10 0 AGIR CONNEX TRANSDEV KEOLIS Others 0 AGIR CONNEX TRANSDEV KEOLIS Others Distribution by company in 2003

  10. Type of contract 80 Not exclusively dedicated to PT 70 60 Exclusively dedicated to PT Contribution financière forfaitaire 50 Nombre de réseaux 40 Gestionà prix forfaitaire 30 Gérance 20 10 0 Commune Municipality Intercommunal authority Greater urban authority Single inter-local authority management board Urban authority Multi-inter-local authority management board Joint management board New town anagement board Distribution by type of organizing authority in 2003

  11. The procedure used Type of contract « Loi Sapin » (1993) Public service delegation procedure Net cost contracts Type of procedure Gross cost contracts ? Public contracts procedure Management contracts « Code des Marchés Publics » (2004) The delegation of a public service entails a contract by which a legal entity subject to public law entrusts the management of a public service for which it is responsible to a public or private delegate, whose remuneration is to a great extent related to the results generated from operating said service.

  12. The procedure used 100% 14 17 22 23 28 80% Public contract 60% Delegation of public service 137 169 173 158 176 40% 20% 0% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Evolution 1999 - 2003

  13. Procedures and contracts 100% Public contracts Management Gross cost Net cost 80% 60% Public service delegation 40% 20% 0% In 2003 Public contracts Management Gross cost Public service delegation Net cost

  14. Conclusion A wide range of situations Changes still in progress • Monitoring and analysis: • what option of delegation? • what type of contract? • what type of procedure for what project? for what public transport policy? Direct management still active and diversified What type of transport policies and projects are being implemented by French urban public transport companies? Do they differ from those implemented in networks that rely on delegated management? Other analysises ongoing, based on the technical and financial indicators present in the database.

  15. Obrigado thierry.gouin@equipement.gouv.fr

More Related