Biennial Review

1. Biennial Review 1. Timeframe: August 1, 2011 – July 30, 2013

2. 2. Individual Faculty Member’s Responsibility Faculty Member prepares 3-page report, including specified % weights attaches maximum 5 pages of attachments, including Academic Affairs Data Sheet Dean evaluates Chair administrative assignment after Chair and Dept. Personnel Committee Evaluation of other areas, as part of 4. Dean’s Review administrative assignment is Dept. Chair? YES NO Non-Dept. Chair administrative assignment? Faculty Members provide administrative aspect of report to Supervisor YES NO Faculty Members provide reports to Dept. Chairs Due September 3-17

3. 3. Department Review and Evaluation Dept. Chairs give Faculty Reports to Dept. Personnel Committees Dept. Personnel Committees evaluate according to Dept. Criteria (first review) Supervisors of Administrative Assignments evaluate administrative aspect of Report Dept. Personnel Committees provide Evaluation to Dept. Chairs Supervisors of Administrative Assignments provide Evaluation of administrative aspect of Report to Dept. Chairs Due Oct. 10 Dept. Chairs evaluate according to Dept. Criteria(second review)

4. 3. Department Review and Evaluation Overall Evaluation differences? Dept Chairs and Dept. Personnel Committees attempt to reconcile YES NO Dept. Chairs submit Evaluations to Deans Due Oct. 24 Dept. Chairs provide Dept. Personnel Committees’ and Chairs’ Evaluations to Faculty Faculty may forward 1-Page Objection to Dept. Evaluations with College Personnel Committee Due Nov. 1

5. 4. Dean’s Review Dept. Evaluations differences unreconciled? Dean meets Dept Chairs and Dept. Personnel Committees to make determination YES NO Dean disagrees with Evaluations? Dean consults College Committees, changes only made if Personnel committee agrees. YES NO Faculty submitted 1-Page Objection to Dept. Review? Dean considers objectionsin final Evaluations YES NO Review Process Complete: Dean provides Evaluations to Provost and Faculty Due Nov. 12

6. 5. Dean and College Personnel Committee Role overall “Contributing Exceptionally” or “Contributing Below Expectations”? Dean and College Personnel Committee review to make determination, reconcile differences YES NO Dean and College Personnel Committee disagree? Overall Assessment will be “Contributing” YES NO 6. Disproportional “Contributing Exceptionally” Disproportional “Contributing Exceptionally” designations? Dean and College Personnel Committee address issue and forward recommendations to Provost YES NO

7. 7. College and University Standards Dean believes Dept. not maintaining College standards? may ask College Evaluation Committee to review Dept. Evaluation Guidelines and Processes YES NO Provost believes College not maintaining University standards? may ask University FAC Committee to review College Evaluation Guidelines and Processes YES

8. Appeals Process faculty member appeals final overall “Contributing Below Expectations” assessment to College Appeals/Grievance Committee Due Nov. 30 College Appeals/Grievance Committee reviews relevant material, reports recommendation to Dean and Faculty Due Jan. 31 Committee affirms “Contributing Below Expectations” assessment? Overall Assessment will be “Contributing Below Expectations” YES NO Overall Assessment will be “Contributing”

9. Appeals Process Dean forwards recommendation to Provost Faculty with “Contributing Below Expectations” Overall Assessment confirmed may send a response to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Due Feb. 7