400 likes | 578 Views
Electronic transport in one-dimensional wires. Akira Furusaki (RIKEN). Outline. Tomonaga-Luttinger (TL) liquid Bosonization Single impurity in a TL liquid Two impurities in a TL liquid linear conductance G Random-matrix approach to transport in disordered wires.
E N D
Electronic transportin one-dimensional wires Akira Furusaki (RIKEN)
Outline • Tomonaga-Luttinger (TL) liquid • Bosonization • Single impurity in a TL liquid • Two impurities in a TL liquidlinear conductanceG • Random-matrix approach to transport in disordered wires Electronic transport in 1D wires
1D metals= Tomanaga-Luttinger liquid • No single-particle excitations • Collective bosonic excitationsspin-charge separation charge density fluctuations spin density fluctuations • Power-law decay of correlation functions (T=0) tunneling density of states Electronic transport in 1D wires
TL liquids are realized in: • Very narrow (single-channel) quantum wires • edge states of fractional quantum Hall liquids • Carbon nanotubes Electronic transport in 1D wires
Interacting spinless fermions • Simplified continuum model kinetic energy short-range repulsive interaction (forward scattering) Electronic transport in 1D wires
Abelian Bosonization • Fermions = Bosons in 1D Electronic transport in 1D wires
Electron density Electronic transport in 1D wires
Kinetic energy Electronic transport in 1D wires
Bosonized Hamiltonian TL liquid parameter g g < 1: repulsive interaction FQHE edgeg = 1: non-interacting case g > 1: attractive interaction Interacting fermions = free bosons Electronic transport in 1D wires
Correlation functions(T=0) Scaling dimension of is Electronic transport in 1D wires
Single impurity • Non-interacting case (free spinless fermions) transmission probability Electronic transport in 1D wires
Current Conductance G changes continuously. no temperature dependence. is a marginal perturbation Electronic transport in 1D wires
Interacting spinless fermions reflection at the barrier potential Hamiltonian free boson + = pinning of charge density wave electric current Electronic transport in 1D wires
Partition function (path integral) effective action for linear: dissipation due to gapless excitations in TL liquid (Caldeira-Leggett: Macroscopic Quantum Coherence) a particle (with coordinate ) moving in a cosine potential with friction Electronic transport in 1D wires
Renormalization-group analysis • Weak-potential limit weak perturbation: scaling equation (lowest order): renormalized potential: conductance Electronic transport in 1D wires
Strong-potential limit (weak-tunneling limit) duality transformation[A. Schmid (’83); compact QED by A.M. Polyakov] “dilute instanton (=tunneling) gas” t: tunneling matrix element (fugacity) Electronic transport in 1D wires
scaling equation: renormalized tunneling matrix element: conductance Electronic transport in 1D wires
Flow diagram for transmission probability(Kane & Fisher, 1992) 1 Trans. Prob. g<1 (repulsive int.) perfect reflection at T=0 g=1 (free fermions) marginal g>1 (attractive int.) perfect transmission at T=0 0 g 1 Electronic transport in 1D wires
Exact results • “Toulouse limit” g=1/2 introduce new fields refermionization quadratic Hamiltonian cf. 2-channel Kondo problem (Emery-Kivelson, 1992) Electronic transport in 1D wires
Conductance at g=1/2 • General gTheboundary sine-Gordon theory is exactly solvable(Ghoshal & Zamolodchikov, 1994) Bethe ansatz elastic single-quasiparticle S-matrix(Fendley, Ludwig & Saleur, 1995) Electronic transport in 1D wires
Spinful case (electrons)(Furusaki & Nagaosa, 1993; Kane & Fisher, 1992) charge boson: spin boson: Hamiltonian : non-interacting electrons : repulsive interactions : if spin sector has SU(2) symmetry Electronic transport in 1D wires
Weak-potential limit • Strong-potential limit (weak-tunneling limit)single-electron tunneling: t • RG flow diagram critical surface at intermediate coupling 1 1 Trans. Prob. Trans. Prob. 0 0 1 Electronic transport in 1D wires
External leads (Fermi-liquid reservoir)(Maslov & Stone, 1994) Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid: Fermi-liquid leads: Action Current Ivs Electric field E dc conductance is not renormalized by the e-e interaction if the wire is connected to Fermi-liquid reservoirs Electronic transport in 1D wires
Weak e-e interactions (Matveev, Yue & Glazman, 1993) small parameter: V(q): Fourier transform of interaction potential scaling equation for the transmission probability lowest order in but exact in conductance Electronic transport in 1D wires
Coulomb interactions (Nagaosa & Furusaki, 1994; Fabrizio, Gogolin & Scheidel, 1994) : width of a quantum wire scaling equation for tunneling conductance stronger suppression than power law Electronic transport in 1D wires
Experiments on tunneling • Edge states in FQHE(Chang, Pfeiffer & West, 1996) tunneling between a Fermi liquid and edge state [Fig. 1 & Fig. 2 of PRL 77, 2538 (1996) were shown in the lecture] Electronic transport in 1D wires
Single-wall carbon nanotubesYao, Postma, Balents & Dekker, Nature 402, 273 (1999) [Fig. 1 and Fig. 3 were shown in the lecture.] Segment I & II: bulk tunneling Across the kink: end-to-end tunneling exp: Electronic transport in 1D wires
Resonant Tunneling (Double barriers) L R • Non-interacting casetransmission amplitude: t has maximum whenresonance (symmetric barrier) symmetric case backscattering is irrelevant asymmetric case backscattering is marginal = single impurity x 0 d Electronic transport in 1D wires
When life time of discrete levels Conductance if coherent tunneling if incoherent sequential tunneling peak width Electronic transport in 1D wires
Resonant tunneling in TL liquids Spinless fermions Hamiltonian gate voltage Current Excess charge in [0, d ] is massive Electronic transport in 1D wires
Weak-potential limit(Kane & Fisher, 1992)effective action for single-barrier problemscaling equation if (symmetric) and (on resonance) 1 g g 1/4 Electronic transport in 1D wires
Resonance line shape symmetric ¼ < g < 1is the only relevant operator, on resonanceuniversal line shapepeak width not Lorentzian Electronic transport in 1D wires
Weak-tunneling limit(Furusaki & Nagaosa, 1993; Furusaki,1998) • Off resonance process is not allowed at low T virtual tunneling • On resonancesequential tunnelinglife time due to tunneling through a barrierpeak width Electronic transport in 1D wires
1 0 1 Phase diagram at T=0 1 • Symmetric barriers • Asymmetric barriersg<1 g=1 g>1 Transmission probability g 0 1/4 1/2 1 Electronic transport in 1D wires
T > 0 • Weak potential • Weak tunnelingsequential tunneling Electronic transport in 1D wires
Experiments on resonant tunneling in TL liquids Auslaender et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1764 (2000) Electronic transport in 1D wires
Carbon nanotubes Postma et al., Science 293, 76 (2001) Electronic transport in 1D wires
Summary • In 1D e-e interaction is crucial Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid • Repulsive e-e interaction backward potential scattering is relevant power-law suppression of tunnel density of states • Problems • nontrivial fixed points at intermediate coupling • Resonant-tunneling experiment? Electronic transport in 1D wires