330 likes | 562 Views
Quality Assurance at Ghent University (Flanders). Joke Claeys Ghent University Department of Educational Affairs Educational Quality Management Office. Ghent University. Founded in 1817 by King William I 4 faculties: Arts & history Law Medicine Science 16 professors
E N D
Quality Assurance at Ghent University (Flanders) Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Joke Claeys • Ghent University • Department of Educational Affairs • Educational Quality Management Office Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Ghent University • Founded in 1817 by King William I • 4 faculties: Arts & history • Law • Medicine • Science • 16 professors • 190 students Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Ghent University 2006 • - 11 faculties • Students: over 28000 • Number of staff: over 6400 • * 909 professors • * 893 assisting academic staff • * 781 other scientific staff • * 1668 externally financed researchers • * 2179 administrative and technical staff Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Since the beginning of the nineties: • a continuous growth from about 15000 to 28000 students has occurred. • This is unique in Flanders. Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Context in Flanders: 6 000 000 inhab. • Basic higher education (bachelor/master) • 161 539 (2005-06), of which: • - higher education: 102 367 • universities: 59 172 • share UGent: 35 % Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Mission (some excerpts): • - distinguishes itself as a socially committed and pluralistic university, open to all students, regardless of their ideological, political, cultural and social background • defines itself in a broad international perspective, all the while accentuating its individuality in terms of language and culture • offers a broad spectrum of high-quality research-based educational programmes,… • opts for a decentralised, dynamic organisation model Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Central administration • Rector • Vice rector • Registrar Bursar • Dep of Personnel & Organization Financial Department • Dep of Administrative Affairs ICT Department • Dep of Research Affairs Dep of Infrastructure • Dep of Educational Affairs Dep of Student facilities Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Department of Educational Affairs • 4 offices: • Educational Quality Management • Student and Career Advice • Student Administration and Study • Programmes • International Relations Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Structures in quality assurance • Central office for quality assessment • Faculty level: 11 quality cells • containing: some professors (one • director of education per faculty), one • full staff member, some students, one • or more administrative member Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Decision making bodies • General: • Central: board of directors (34 members), • executive committee, management committee • Faculty: faculty board • Education: • - Educational board: advisory to the central bodies • * Vice rector + director of education • * Representatives of the faculties: professors, assistants, • students • * Experts Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Quality Assurance of educationin Flanders • Central element in the startup: • Decree on universities (June 12th, 1991) • Art 122 Imposes a continuous monitoring of the quality of education: internal and external QA are mentioned Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Realisations: • Internal QA: student questionnaires • External QA: peer review: • visitations of the first generation Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Ghent University: student evaluation (since 1993-94) • The evaluation of education is • considered as an essential part of • the quality system. • The users of the education, namely • the students, are ideally placed to • judge it. Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Student evaluation: what about ? (1) • An impression of the satisfaction of • students with the services offered • by the university • Specific: the perception of several • aspects of the teaching and learning • activities, namely: Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Student evaluation: what about ? (2) • The teaching process itself • The examinations • Supporting services: study • guidance, library, electronic learning • environment • Infrastructure: audiences, laboratories, • buildings,… Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
External QA: • First round: 1992-2002 • Peer review of all basic study programs • Strongly inspired by the Dutch approach • by VSNU (now QANU), e.g. manual Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Flemish Interuniversitary Council (°1976) • Autonomous body, representing the universities, financed • by them • Gives advice to the minister of education and science • Organises interuniversitary consultations about: • * quality assurance and accreditation • * educational policy • * research policy • * university governance • * administration • It’s secretariat organises the external quality assurance for • all Flemish universities Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
External QA: peer review (visitations) • 8 year cycle • A panel of experts judges the program • Result: • - a public report on all the important issues • - a related score list (comparison between • institutions is possible) • - recommendations for improvement Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
External QA: Visitations (peer review) • Phases in the process: • 1 .The program writes a self • evaluation report. Professors, • assistant professors, students, • alumni,… are all involved. • A manual with guidelines is strictly • followed. Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Contents of the self evaluation report (1) • Profile, goals and aims • Program: structure, contents, teaching, evaluation • Dissertation and training • Students: numbers, success rates • Study timing, tutorship, information Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Contents of the self evaluation report (2) • 6. Alumni: quality and work situation • 7. Organisational elements of the • program • 8. Infrastructure • 9. Personnel and personnel policy • 10. Internationalisation • 11. Internal quality assurance Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
External QA: Visitations (peer review) • 2. - A commission of experts is • composed, on the proposal of the • programs involved. They act on a • completely independant base. • - Experts in the subject matter; 5 • persons, 1 president, 1 didactical • expert Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
External QA: Visitations (peer review) • 3. The commission reads the self • assessment report. • 4. - Site visit: 2,5 days • - meetings with professors, assistant • professors, other personnel involved in • education, students, alumni, study • guidance,… Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
External QA: Visitations (peer review) • 5. The commission writes a report • containing their evaluation of the • program, recommendations, good • practices,… • The different programs are also • compared. Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
External QA: Visitations (peer review) • 6. - The report is published and can • be consulted by future students, • newspapers, other institutions,… • - The Minister of Education gets a • report. • 7. The programs react upon the • recommendations and can make • adaptations to the study program. Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
External QA: • - Second round: 2003-2011 • Programs are reviewed a second • time • Reactions to recommendations and • improvements are also taken into • consideration Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Decree on Higher Education (April 2nd, 2003) • Introduction of the bachelor/master • structure • Obligation of Quality Assurance is • repeated • Introduction of Accreditation: • condition for organisation of programs Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Accreditation: a second generation of external QA • Antecedents: societal evolutions • Internationalisation: cooperation; • mobility of professors and students • Globalisation: a market for research • and study programs emerges • Liberalisation: commercial suppliers can • can organise education • - Evolution towards a knowledge society Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Accreditation: definition • A formal, public judgement made by an independant body, based upon an evaluation of quality, guaranteeing that basic standards are met Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Functions of accreditation • Guarantee a certain basic quality of • institutions or programs • Reinforce the existing forms of QA e.g. by • strenghtening their sanctioning capacity • Create more standardisation of norms, • procedures and criteria, to enhance • comparability • Improve the public responsibility function of QA • by giving transparant info to students, parents,… Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06
Contents of self evaluation/ style accreditation • Different arrangement, same • contents as in 1st round • 6 subjects, divided in facets • The commission judges the subjects • and facets • - Consequences for accreditation Tempus Bitola, 8/12-11-06