1 / 23

Ghent University

Ghent University. Workshop Tempus Curricula Review 19-21 October 2005. AMEE A worldwide association for all interested in medical and health care professions education Amsterdam RAI 30 august – 2 september 2005. 2005 Conference themes Themes include:

gomer
Download Presentation

Ghent University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ghent University • Workshop Tempus • Curricula Review • 19-21 October 2005 Workshop Curricula review

  2. AMEE A worldwide association for all interested in medical and health care professions education Amsterdam RAI 30 august – 2 september 2005 2005 Conference themes Themes include: A: Curriculum and learning outcomes; B: Teaching and learning; C: Assessment; D: Educational management; E: Undergraduate/basic medical education; F: Postgraduate/specialist training/continuing professional development; G: Multiprofessional education. Workshop Curricula review

  3. Relevance 3 Design 1 Conclusion 4 Reliability 2 Development and validation of a prospective, random sample method for measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education J Van der Veken jos.vanderveken@ugent AMEE 2005 Amsterdam Workshop Curricula review Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance

  4. Monitoring : study guide realistic ? Evaluation new medical curriculum Impact of educational Innovations Impact of BaMa reform Monitoring ECTS-contract Why should we ? AMEE 2005 Amsterdam How should we ? Prospective Stratified random samples of students and weeks Workshop Curricula review

  5. Bologna Action Lines 1-5 • 1: System of easily readable & comparable degrees • 2: System based on two cycles (now 3) • 3: Establishment of a system of credits • 4: Promotion of mobility • 5: Promotion of European cooperation in quality assurance Ad 3 ECTS – method of describing time spent on a topic – so can compare curricula Workshop Curricula review

  6. Relevance 3 Design 1 Conclusion 4 Reliability 2 Development and validation of a prospective, random sample method for measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education AMEE 2005 Amsterdam J Van der Veken jos.vanderveken@ugent Workshop Curricula review Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance

  7. DESIGN 4WS procedure • All students of a study year • 10 research groups : at random Proportional for gender / educational group • Each research group participates 4 weeks equally divided over academic year 2 ‘normal lesson’ - weeks 1 week : preparation of exams – 1 ‘exam’-week • Recall in case of non-response (proposing an alternative week) AMEE 2005 Amsterdam Workshop Curricula review

  8. Planned acitiv Who Where Tool Study-activty Subject The form Workshop Curricula review

  9. Relevance 3 Design 1 Conclusion 4 Reliability 2 Development and validation of a prospective, random sample method for measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education AMEE 2005 Amsterdam J Van der Veken jos.vanderveken@ugent Workshop Curricula review Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance

  10. no difference between two registration periods of same curriculum year 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Reliability AMEE 2005 Amsterdam 6 course units unchanged 63% of estimated study time MD1 MD1 year 1 6 course units unchanged 65% of estimated study time MD2 MD 2 year 2 6 course units unchanged 67% of estimated study time year 3 MD3 MD3 Workshop Curricula review

  11. Year-totals and course unit-totals = nearly equal 0.9% 3.3% year 1 year 2 year 3 h 0.6% Participation 1 : 95% Participation 2 : 89% Participation 1 : 80% Participation 2 : 76% Participation 1 : 64% Participation 2 : 60% 800 600 400 200 coh1 coh2 11 h 7 % 33 h 7 % 26 h 9 % Workshop Curricula review

  12. Relevance 3 Design 1 Conclusion 4 Reliability 2 Development and validation of a prospective, random sample method for measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education AMEE 2005 Amsterdam J Van der Veken jos.vanderveken@ugent Workshop Curricula review Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance

  13. example 1 MD year 2 – 2001-2002 participation selected students Number of students AMEE 2005 Amsterdam week Workshop Curricula review

  14. example 2 MD year 2 – 2001-2002 timing study-activities sem 1 sem 2 Number of hours / week self-study planned weeknumber Workshop Curricula review

  15. Relevance Report example 3 example 3 Workshop Curricula review

  16. example 4 course unit 1 AMEE 2005 Amsterdam Workshop Curricula review

  17. example 5 MD year 2 – 2001-2002 Learning activities % of total of hours of selfstudy Workshop Curricula review

  18. example 6 unit 1 processing preparation unit 2 unit 3 unit 4 tasks unit 5 Preparation evaluation unit 6 unit 7 unit 8 Workshop Curricula review % of total of hours of selfstudy excl. examination period

  19. example 7 Evolution of learning tools 38 h 42 h year 1 year 2 45 h 27 h year 3 year 4 Workshop Curricula review % of total of hours of selfstudy

  20. example 8 Evolution of study place 2% 1% 17 h 20 h 98 % Year 1 Year 2 0,3% 1% 2% 5% 17 h 4 h 98 % 94 % Year 4 Year 3 Workshop Curricula review % of total of hours of selfstudy

  21. example 9 Learning partners in different curricula Medicine Clinical psychology 3 Educational Sciences 1 Educational Sciences 3 Workshop Curricula review % of total of hours of selfstudy

  22. Relevance 3 Design 1 Conclusion 4 Development and validation of a prospective, random sample method for measuring study-time and learning context in Medical Education AMEE 2005 Amsterdam Reliability J Van der Veken jos.vanderveken@ugent 2 Workshop Curricula review Jos Van der Veken, MD, Research Associate, Directorate Educational Affairs, Centre Educational Quality Assurance

  23. strong design • feasible for students • high participation • stable measurements • reliable results • Huge quantity of information about study time and learning context • Ideal instrument for follow-up educational interventions and monitoring study process in higher education • (and why not in secondary schools ?) Conclusion AMEE 2005 Amsterdam Workshop Curricula review

More Related