E N D
1. What do I Have to Report to the IRB? (and Other Mysterious Things!)
2.
“If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?” ~Albert Einstein
Marie Curie with Albert Einstein
3. Objectives Participants will be able to identify the major reporting requirements of IRB’s
Participants will be able to identify how to report events to the IRB
Participants will be able to identify non-compliance issues in reporting
4. What Does the Seton Office of Research Administration Do? It is the responsibility of the Seton Office of Research Administration:
To protect and provide guidance to our patients involved in research, our physicians, and the organization as a whole.
To manage and educate our Institutional Regulatory Boards, Researchers, Research Team Members.
5. What is an IRB? Institutional Review Boards (IRB) –
The primary responsibility of IRB is to protect human subjects.
The board evaluates the safety and ethical issues surrounding potential research.
The board is concerned with adequate research subject informed consent, potential risks and benefits to research subjects, protection of human subject rights, and potential ethical and financial impact of research studies.
The IRB is also charged with the responsibility of evaluating the science, methodology, design, and statistical validity and reliability of potential research studies.
These boards are monitored directly by the DHHS.
6. Primary Responsibilities of IRB’s Institutional Review Boards Review Requirements as required by law include but are not limited to:
1) Risk must be minimized
2) Risk/Benefit ratio must be reasonable
3) Selection must be equitable
4) Informed consent must be documented
5) Data must be monitored to ensure subject safety
6) Confidentiality must be maintained
7) Vulnerable populations must be protected
7. What Else Is the IRB Concerned With? Patient/Human Subject Protection and Safety
Confidentiality
Investigator Protection
Institutional Protection
Research Integrity
Public and Institutional Trust
8. Ethics Nuremberg Code 1947
Informed Consent, i Risk, Results Valuable
Declaration of Helsinki 1964
Independent Review, Preserve Confidentiality
Belmont Report 1979
Respect for Persons, Beneficence, Justice
9. Ethics Research Timeline
6th Century B.C. to Present
Things still go wrong despite our best efforts
Nicole Wan - 1996
Jessie Gelsinger – 1999
Ellen Roche – 2001
Transparency and Effective Communication and crucial between researchers and IRB’s