1 / 26

Vinyl Chloride Emission Reduction Strategies:

James C. Kenney, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Middle Atlantic Regional Office kenney.james@epa.gov. Vinyl Chloride Emission Reduction Strategies: How U.S. EPA Enforcers Working With Industry Achieved Results March 1, 2006 Atlanta, Georgia. Overview.

bridie
Download Presentation

Vinyl Chloride Emission Reduction Strategies:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. James C. Kenney, Environmental EngineerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Middle Atlantic Regional Officekenney.james@epa.gov Vinyl Chloride Emission Reduction Strategies: How U.S. EPA Enforcers Working With Industry Achieved Results March 1, 2006 Atlanta, Georgia

  2. Overview • Introduction • Brief Chronology • Research Methodology • Implementation • Developments • Conclusion

  3. Introduction The Vinyl Chloride Project: • a multimedia targeting approach for improved human health and environmental benefits • a method totrace the impact of a chemical across all statutes • a single focus of reducing the total amount of a chemical, regardless of the environmental pathways

  4. Introduction The Vinyl Chloride Pilot Project: • does not change existing laws, regulations or Agency decisions • does not create new regulatory authorities

  5. Introduction The Vinyl Chloride Pilot Project: • Requirescompliance with existing permits and regulations • Seeksinjunctive relief, economic benefits and civil penalties (where appropriate) • Creativelyuses existing EPA policies to seek additional reductions

  6. Brief Chronology • July 2001GAO determined EPA needed a strategic approach to deploying resources nationally • November 2001EPA Region III began researching the regulatory and environmental impact of pollutants crossing media boundaries

  7. Brief Chronology • April 14, 2004 • EPA Headquarters selected the Vinyl Chloride Project as a National pilot for a workforce deployment pilot in response to GAO’s concerns • EPA Region III was asked by EPA Headquarters to lead the National pilot and develop a team consisting of Regions 2, 4, 5, 6 and the other EPA offices

  8. Research Methodology Step 1: Environmental Indicator Development Legal Analysis and Chemical Literature Review Step 2: Environmental Data Step 2:Non-Environmental Data Step 4:Build Expertise; Target, Inspect and Case Development Step 3: Identify Industry and/or Processes

  9. Research Methodology • Step 1: Identify environmental indicators • Example: National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) data and Ozone Non-Attainment Status • Step 2: Holistically integrate environmental, non-environmental data and environmental justice indicators • Example: Public health data • All Cause Mortality Rates • Cancer Mortality Rates • Infant Mortality Rates • Infant Low Birth Rate • Pediatric Asthma Attacks • Steps 1 and 2 yielded six chemicals of concern

  10. Research Methodology • Chemicals of concern: • Acetaldehyde • Propylene Dichloride • Ethylene Oxide • Dichloromethane • Trichloromethane • Vinyl Chloride All six chemicals are probable or known carcinogens; regulated under many Federal / State laws; and volatilize at standard atmospheric conditions.

  11. Research Methodology

  12. Research Methodology Vinyl Chloride Emissions Data (Source: TRI)

  13. Research Methodology • Step 3: Identify industries / processes • Of all the vinyl chloride emitting industries, Chemicals and Allied Products emits 500 times more than the next largest vinyl chloride emitting industry • Step 4: Build technical and legal expertise • ‘Plastics Fundamentals’ class through Penn State University • RCRA Unraveled by McCoys and Associates • Develop multimedia regulatory & policy guidance compendium • Monitor “Plastics News” for PVC manufacturing and trends

  14. Research Methodology • Research evidence focused on vinyl chloride fromPVC manufacturing facilities: • Known human carcinogen • Ozone precursor • NOx + VOC = Ozone • High ambient air concentrations according to NATA data • Volatilizes from liquid to gas at room temperature • Active trade, industry and environmental groups • Regulated under CAA, CWA, RCRA, EPCRA, and CERCLA

  15. Research Methodology Vinyl Chloride (CAS: 75014)

  16. Research Methodology * Compiled by U.S. EPA Region from publicly available data sources.

  17. Implementation

  18. ImplementationOccidental Chemical Corp. Pottstown, Pennsylvania • January/February 2003EPA and State representatives conduct a processed-based, multimedia investigation • October 1, 2003EPA files a multimedia administrative order and complaint • July 9, 2004EPA and Occidental settle the multimedia action for $1.1 million and a 26 ton reduction of vinyl chloride. Alleged counts included: CAA, CERCLA, CWA, EPCRA, RCRA and SPCC

  19. ImplementationOccidental Chemical Corp.Pottstown, Pennsylvania • Strategy: • Vinyl chloride reductions paramount • Public Health / Environmental Benefits • 26 ton reduction of vinyl chloride • Settlement Summary • $1.1 million dollar settlement • Nominal injunctive relief • $900,000 in SEPs to reduce 26 tons of vinyl chloride, retire emission reduction credits and a water usage reduction • $150,000 in civil penalty

  20. ImplementationFormosa Plastics Corp. Delaware City, Delaware • June 2003EPA and State representatives conduct a processed-based, multimedia investigation • September 2004U.S. Department of Justice, EPA and State meet with Formosa to establish prerequisites for negotiation, including a six month, closed-loop negotiation process • March 2005Consent decree signed by all parties. Counts included: CAA, CERCLA, CWA, EPCRA, RCRA and SPCC. • June 2005Consent decree lodged, opportunity for public comment begins • September 2005Consent decree entered by court

  21. ImplementationFormosa Plastics Corp.Delaware City, Delaware • Strategy • Prerequisites for settlement: • Sixth month closed-loop negotiations • Vinyl chloride reductions beyond Federal & State permitted levels • Performance of SEP in addition to beyond compliance reductions • Unified DOJ, EPA and State legal, technical and management team • Public Health and Environmental Benefits • 18 ton reduction of vinyl chloride immediately • Incentive based 10 ton reduction of vinyl chloride within three years • Settlement Summary • $1.8 million dollar settlement • $450,000 in injunctive relief • $847,000 in SEPs and incentive projects to reduce vinyl chloride • $450,000 in civil penalty

  22. Implementation • To date, EPA has assessed the multimedia compliance status of: • 83% of the facilities engaged in the manufacture of PVC in the U.S. • 95% of the U.S. manufacturing capacity • 90% of the corporations engaged in the manufacture of PVC in the U.S.

  23. Developments • Common issues emerging in all media programs: • Leak Detection and Repair (CAA) • Sampling and Analysis (CAA, CWA, RCRA) • Surface Impoundments (CAA, CWA, RCRA)

  24. Developments • EPA Regulatory Developments • Clean Water Act – Effluent Guidelines • Clean Air Act – MACT Remand • Federal and State Coordination • New VCM and PVC plants • Federal Government Coordination • Chemical Hazard and Safety Board • Industry and Trade Group Outreach • Environmental “Best Practices” of PVC Production

  25. Developments • Beyond PVC and vinyl chloride: • Various Regions are using this targeting approach for other chemicals • Propylene dichloride • Methylene chloride • Styrene

  26. Conclusion • A single focus of reducing the total amount of a chemical, regardless of the environmental pathway, has lead to the development novel settlement techniques for EPA and industry. • This approach combines the best concepts from innovative EPA programs (such as Project XL) with traditional enforcement concepts to obtain unprecedented environmental and public health benefits.

More Related