1 / 11

Institutional Study

Institutional Study. Gitonga N. Mburugu Kenyatta University Senior Managers meeting. Conference Hall KARI Headquarters 17 th July 2008. Institutions involved and IAR4D Experts. JKUAT - 1 KU - 2 UON - 2 EU - 2 MOL - 1 MOA - 2 KARI - 2 KENFAP -2.

britain
Download Presentation

Institutional Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Institutional Study Gitonga N. Mburugu Kenyatta University Senior Managers meeting. Conference Hall KARI Headquarters 17th July 2008

  2. Institutions involved and IAR4DExperts • JKUAT - 1 • KU - 2 • UON - 2 • EU - 2 • MOL - 1 • MOA - 2 • KARI - 2 • KENFAP -2

  3. Purpose of the study • Collectively Understand Culture and operations of partner institutions • Mandates • Strategic plans • Planning and budget cycle • Establish entry points for IAR4D

  4. Methodology • Development of Check list for institutional survey • Check list in two parts • IAR4D Practice among partner institutions • IAR4D existence within institutions • Circulation and Modification of Check list • Data analysis • Participatory cross sectional review • Comments by core team members

  5. Objectives • Entry points for IAR4D • Document work plans and budgeting cycles • Document Elements of IAR4D in institutions

  6. Key findings • Collaboration • Informal • Initiated by individuals • Mutually beneficial • Easily dissolved but no defined period • Personal commitment and touch • benefits to individual and institution not clearly defined

  7. Formal linkage • Can evolve from formal to informal • Can start administratively • Lifespan defined in agreement documents • Engagement is official • Personal commitment can not be assured

  8. What other innovative structures of associating ? • A professional body recognized by the partner institutions? Medical and dentists board? • A structured meeting of partners to address common interest? Joint admissions board (JAB)? • Agriculture Sector Coordinating Unit ASCU? • Which way IAR4D and partner institutions?

  9. Strategic plans • Have objectives addressing linkages • IAR4D elements, training, capacity building • Only KARI refers directly to IAR4D in SP. • Cross cutting issues • Gender mainstreaming • HIV and AIDs • Environmental issues • Poverty alleviation

  10. Recommendations • Retooling courses in IAR4D for all partner institutions • Universities – incorporate IAR4D elements into, undergraduate and Post graduate curriculum • Short courses for other stakeholders • Need for partner institutions to continually engage in dialogue

  11. Thank you

More Related