1 / 22

Studying the Effects of Aging in Major League Baseball

Studying the Effects of Aging in Major League Baseball. Phil Birnbaum www.philbirnbaum.com. Aging patterns in baseball. How do players age? Is it different for hitters and pitchers? If you have a good player who's 31, how much do you expect him to decline over the next few years?

britanney-guzman
Download Presentation

Studying the Effects of Aging in Major League Baseball

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Studying the Effects of Aging in Major League Baseball Phil Birnbaum www.philbirnbaum.com

  2. Aging patterns in baseball • How do players age? • Is it different for hitters and pitchers? • If you have a good player who's 31, how much do you expect him to decline over the next few years? • Want a result like: "hitters decline X% between age 31 and 35"

  3. Studies • Bill James' classic aging study in the "1982 Baseball Abstract" • Work by Tom Tango • Academic studies: Jim Albert, Ray C. Fair, and others • (This presentation is based mostly on Tango, with a bit of James)

  4. Previous findings • The best batters peak at 27 – that's when most of the major awards are won (James) • Different skills peak at different times: speed early, HRs mid-career, BBs late (Tango)

  5. A naive look • What's the average performance of the various age cohorts? • Fairly similar, it turns out, except at the extremes

  6. Average Batting vs. Age

  7. Average Pitching vs. Age

  8. A naive look • Statistical illusion • Curve traces different groups of players • Players at 25 are a cross-section of the league • Players at 40 are former superstars • The players at 40 were much better players when they were 25

  9. Example • Age 27 • Player A: 6.00 … Player B: 5.00 … Player C: 4.00 • Average: 5.00 • Age 35 • Player A: 5.50 … Player B: 4.50 … Player C: released • Average: 5.00 • Age 40 • Player A: 5.00 … Player B: retired … Player C: released • Average: 5.00 • All players decline with age, but the mean is still 5.00

  10. Paired seasons • "Paired seasons" method • Find all players who were 28 in season X • See how they did in season X+1 • (Weight the average by playing time) • The average difference reflects the effects of aging from 28 to 29 • Career path obtained by chaining (multiplying) single-year effects

  11. Paired seasons: Batting

  12. Paired seasons: Pitching

  13. Paired seasons: results biased • The paired-seasons method shows big declines as players age • But it suffers from a bias – selective sampling • Players who were "lucky" in season X (large positive error term) get more playing time in season X+1 • Those "lucky" players will show bigger declines • So big declines are over-represented

  14. Example • Three 37-year-olds, all of whom have skill of .250 this year, .240 next year • This year, due to chance, they hit .200, .250, .300 respectively • The .200 guy is forced to retire • The .250 guy plays half time next year and loses 10 points (.250  .240) • The .300 guy plays full time next year and loses 60 points (.300  .240) • The weighted average loss is 43 points, not 10 points • The decline is very much overestimated

  15. How can we eliminate this bias? • Can try to estimate the "true" talent of the three players • Regressing to the mean • The .200 guy is "probably" .220 • The .250 guy is "probably" .250 • The .300 guy is "probably" .280 • Now the third guy declines only 40 points, not 60 • Average decline: 30 points • More accurate than previous estimate of 43 points • If we regressed "perfectly" – all players to their talent of .250 – we'd get the right answer (10 pts)

  16. Regressing season X • How much to regress? • Need to do some research to figure that out • Can probably get a theoretical lower bound from binomial (multinomial) distribution • For now, consider 10% and 30%

  17. Batting, regressed 10%

  18. Batting, regressed 30%

  19. Pitching, regressed 10%

  20. Pitching, regressed 30%

  21. Conclusions • Results sensitive to how much we regress • Getting correct estimates of aging using the paired-seasons method depends on solving the selective sampling problem and/or figuring out how much to regress • Alternative: can fit curves to careers (Albert, Fair) • But this method requires a long career, which means only the most successful players are analyzed • Some selective sampling issues there too

  22. References • "Looking For the Prime," 1982 Bill James Baseball Abstract, p. 191 • Tom Tango, http://tangotiger.net/agepatterns.txt • Tom Tango, "Forecasting Pitchers – Adjacent Seasons," http://www.tangotiger.net/adjacentPitching.html • Ray C. Fair, "Estimated Age Effects in Baseball," http://www.bepress.com/jqas/vol4/iss1/1/

More Related