1 / 12

Review of the Daisy Model Coordinating Youth Services California Youth Council Institute

Review of the Daisy Model Coordinating Youth Services California Youth Council Institute May 14 - 15, 2002. Analysis of WIA Youth RFP Process. Decision points? ‘Program design framework’? How access ten service elements, including follow-up services? Strategy for OSY?

brittany-price
Download Presentation

Review of the Daisy Model Coordinating Youth Services California Youth Council Institute

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Review of the Daisy Model Coordinating Youth Services California Youth Council Institute May 14 - 15, 2002

  2. Analysis of WIA Youth RFP Process • Decision points? • ‘Program design framework’? • How access ten service elements, including follow-up services? • Strategy for OSY? • Conversion of summer jobs?

  3. Review: WIA’s potential for building a youth system • Comprehensive coverage • YCs are convening intermediaries • Comprehensive vision; youth development • Chance to accomplish ‘system planning’ • Resource coordination necessary to achieve vision

  4. Model A V1: 9 service elements Intake, assessment, ISS Follow-up V2: 9 service elements V3: 9 service elements SDA orOSCC SDA orOSCC Multiple vendors, each one provides all service elements

  5. Model B V1: Outreach, 10 elements, follow-up Intake, assessment, ISS, case management V2: Outreach, 10 elements, follow-up V3: Outreach, 10 elements, follow-up “SDA” Multiple vendors, each one provides all service elements AND follow-up

  6. Model C Prime Vendor is responsible for providing or contracting to obtain all ten service elements Intake, assessment, ISS, case management. follow-up Sub 1: service Sub 2: service Sub 3: service SDA orOSCC

  7. Model D Intake, eligibility, assessment, ISS, ten service elements, case management, follow-up V1: Alternative Education Intake, eligibility, assessment, ISS, ten service elements, case management, follow-up V2: Occup skills V3: Summer Jobs Intake, eligibility, assessment, ISS, ten service elements, case management, follow-up

  8. What do these models tell us? • Delivery system in the first year is vendor-driven rather than client-driven • Distinction between SDA and career center is not always clear • Very little mention of non-WIA youth programs or resources. • Not much movement to a vision of ‘networked services’

  9. What do these models tell us? • Burden placed on the vendors to ‘figure out’ all service elements • Many terms are vague: • “collaborate”; “follow-up”; “case management” • Role for outreach is not always clear • Service strategy for OSY is not always clear

  10. A vision for ‘networked services’ • Youth-centered • Emphasize the centralized brokering role for framework services • Emphasizes MOA-type understanding between service partners, not just award contract for programs • Builds on service inventory, resource map, and demographic data

  11. Guidance & Couns. Academics Follow-up Alt. Education Mentoring Assessment, ISS, Case Mgmt Summer Jobs Leadership Dev. SupportServices Occup.Skills Workexperience WIA’s Ten Required Service Elements

  12. Career dev’ment Academic Support Boys & Girls Club Juvenilejustice Assessment, ISS, Case Mgmt, Follow-up Foster care Summer Jobs Teen Parents Big Brothers School- to-work

More Related