120 likes | 204 Views
Review of the Daisy Model Coordinating Youth Services California Youth Council Institute May 14 - 15, 2002. Analysis of WIA Youth RFP Process. Decision points? ‘Program design framework’? How access ten service elements, including follow-up services? Strategy for OSY?
E N D
Review of the Daisy Model Coordinating Youth Services California Youth Council Institute May 14 - 15, 2002
Analysis of WIA Youth RFP Process • Decision points? • ‘Program design framework’? • How access ten service elements, including follow-up services? • Strategy for OSY? • Conversion of summer jobs?
Review: WIA’s potential for building a youth system • Comprehensive coverage • YCs are convening intermediaries • Comprehensive vision; youth development • Chance to accomplish ‘system planning’ • Resource coordination necessary to achieve vision
Model A V1: 9 service elements Intake, assessment, ISS Follow-up V2: 9 service elements V3: 9 service elements SDA orOSCC SDA orOSCC Multiple vendors, each one provides all service elements
Model B V1: Outreach, 10 elements, follow-up Intake, assessment, ISS, case management V2: Outreach, 10 elements, follow-up V3: Outreach, 10 elements, follow-up “SDA” Multiple vendors, each one provides all service elements AND follow-up
Model C Prime Vendor is responsible for providing or contracting to obtain all ten service elements Intake, assessment, ISS, case management. follow-up Sub 1: service Sub 2: service Sub 3: service SDA orOSCC
Model D Intake, eligibility, assessment, ISS, ten service elements, case management, follow-up V1: Alternative Education Intake, eligibility, assessment, ISS, ten service elements, case management, follow-up V2: Occup skills V3: Summer Jobs Intake, eligibility, assessment, ISS, ten service elements, case management, follow-up
What do these models tell us? • Delivery system in the first year is vendor-driven rather than client-driven • Distinction between SDA and career center is not always clear • Very little mention of non-WIA youth programs or resources. • Not much movement to a vision of ‘networked services’
What do these models tell us? • Burden placed on the vendors to ‘figure out’ all service elements • Many terms are vague: • “collaborate”; “follow-up”; “case management” • Role for outreach is not always clear • Service strategy for OSY is not always clear
A vision for ‘networked services’ • Youth-centered • Emphasize the centralized brokering role for framework services • Emphasizes MOA-type understanding between service partners, not just award contract for programs • Builds on service inventory, resource map, and demographic data
Guidance & Couns. Academics Follow-up Alt. Education Mentoring Assessment, ISS, Case Mgmt Summer Jobs Leadership Dev. SupportServices Occup.Skills Workexperience WIA’s Ten Required Service Elements
Career dev’ment Academic Support Boys & Girls Club Juvenilejustice Assessment, ISS, Case Mgmt, Follow-up Foster care Summer Jobs Teen Parents Big Brothers School- to-work