1 / 40

George Machovec Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries http://grweb.coalliance.org 303-759-3399 george@coalliance.org S

How Do ERMs Improve the User Experience?. George Machovec Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries http://grweb.coalliance.org 303-759-3399 george@coalliance.org September 2007. The Problem. Libraries are spending increasing amounts on electronic resources

brittney
Download Presentation

George Machovec Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries http://grweb.coalliance.org 303-759-3399 george@coalliance.org S

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How Do ERMs Improve the User Experience? George Machovec Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries http://grweb.coalliance.org 303-759-3399 george@coalliance.org September 2007

  2. The Problem • Libraries are spending increasing amounts on electronic resources • Patrons and librarians are unable to find many of these resources (many not cataloged) • We have purchased access to many full-text resources…we just don’t know what & where! • Full-text within aggregations are especially difficult to find

  3. How do you define your ERMS? • Just subscriptions management? • The broader definition? • Subscriptions management • Link resolution • A-Z services • Content analysis

  4. Who Are We? • Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries • A non-profit consortium of 12 libraries founded in 1974. 501c3 • History of innovation • CARL ILS (sold in 1995) – now TLC • UnCover (sold in 1995) – now Ingenta

  5. Who Are We? • Member of ICOLC • We do standard consortial stuff with a twist • Database licensing, shared collection development • Data hosting Software development (e.g. Gold Rush, Prospector, Fedora Digital Repository, The Charleston Advisor) • Operates over 20 servers

  6. What Do Patrons Want? • “I just want everything I want, when I want it” – my nephew when he was 5 years old • Are your users any different?

  7. What Do Patrons Want? • Patrons don’t care about you’re the details of your services unless they are not working • For the most part our ERMS should be invisible like plumbing….but it better work • Patrons don’t care about how much you pay or who is the vendor • For the most part patrons don’t care about the “terms and conditions” of products and services

  8. Trends • The “hot” solution a couple of years ago was metasearch/federated solutions. • The new hot trend is for libraries overlay suites of key resources with search and discovery tools

  9. Trends • Search and discovery tools include commercial and open source soutions such as: • Open source: Lucene, SOLR, VuFind, etc. • Commercial: Aquabrowser, Endeca, Encore, Primo, etc • Hosted: OCLC WorldCat Local • What are you putting under your big umbrella?

  10. Trends • Why the “big umbrella” • Super fast response time (like Google) • Great control over look and feel including tag clouds, graphical representation, better screen layout, etc. • Wonderful faceting and limiting options • Better integration with link resolvers, local resources • Bring to the forefront important but lesser used resources

  11. Trends • Big umbrella examples • Univ of Chicago is putting AquaBrowser over its catalog, EAD documents and SFX holdings • Ungava, National Research Council of Canada is using Lucene, Carrot2, etc to index its catalog, its own publication and 1.7 million articles in biomedicine • Univ of Washington, WorldCat Local includes local catalog, regional union catalog, OCLC holdings, ArticleFirst • Your ERM needs to be a part of such efforts

  12. Trends • Extraction of holdings to share with other services • Google Scholar • OCLC eSerials program (can take metadata extracted from your ERMS in GS format)

  13. Gold Rush Offers • Initially developed by consortium in 2001 and offered to libraries outside of consortium in 2003 • Subscriptions Management • Link Resolution (OpenURL) • Public Searching interface (A-Z list) • Content Analysis

  14. Where does GR fit in the marketplace? • ERM marketplace as a continuum of choices • Locally developed • Open Source products (e.g. CUFTS from Simon Fraser for link resolution, content comparison) • Non-profit – Gold Rush (Colorado Alliance) • Commercial (e.g. Serials Solutions, ILS vendors, etc)

  15. Observations • We were so early in marketplace for the ERM component most of our libraries didn’t know what to do with it

  16. Knowledge Base • Gold Rush currently has >1500 title lists • Primary publishers • Aggregators • Indexing & abstracting services • Gold Rush contains many Open Access (free) journals available as title lists

  17. Building & Maintenance • Constant updating of title lists • We supplement title lists from aggregators and publishers with subject headings and alternate titles • You can upload, modify, add or delete title lists or individual titles at any time • Can load local serials holdings

  18. Libraries • Selected libraries now using Gold Rush include: • Several Colorado Alliance member libraries • Several medical libraries in Oklahoma and Texas • University of New Mexico (UNM), Santa Fe Institute, College of Santa Fe • Brigham Young University (main and law) • University of Alaska • Chicago Public Library • Fort Collins Public Library • Pacific Lutheran University • and others

  19. Knowledge Base Staff Chicago Public Library • Select title lists from central knowledge base • Upload new content if desired • Add, modify and delete title lists or content within lists as needed University of New Mexico Gold Rush Central Knowledge Base (Denver) University of OK Health Sciences

  20. Technical Details • Operates on suite of Linux Servers • Industry standard MySQL, Perl and ColdFusion • Current database >1,500 databases, aggregators, publishers • ASP solution. Servers in Denver.

  21. Key Challenges for small organization • Create a great deal of local control • Ability to upload/download your own title lists • Ability to create or update lists on a one-by-one basis • Ability to customize link resolver • Ability to customize A-Z • Simple Web forms in a structured • XML gateway to make the service anything you want for better integration with other web services

  22. Cool Features • Subscriptions Management • Starts with core template of fields • Allows libraries to add, remove and rename fields and what goes in each tab (section). Unlimited for all practical purposes • One click export of all subscription records into Excel

  23. Cool Features • Content comparisons • Compare two databases • Compare suites of databases • Detailed use statistics

  24. Soon to Be Released Enhancement • Incident tracker • The ability to report problems for any service • A public messaging capability for users in the public interface • Will be available from holdings, subscriptions and via a direct URL for reference desk • Email notification to your staff • Reports for open and closed incidents

  25. Partnership • We view Gold Rush as a collaboration among participating libraries • We want to work with you to make the project better and to met your needs as well as those of others

  26. Information • Full documentation available • Within the Gold Rush Staff Toolbox • At the Gold Rush informational Website at http://grweb.coalliance.org • goldrush-l listserv • Software updates • Title list updates • System maintenance and other general info

  27. More Information Contact Information: • (303) 759-3399 (phone) • (303) 759-3363 (fax) • goldrush@coalliance.org • Staff toolbox web report forms

  28. GR LinkerClassic Look

  29. GR LinkerCustom Look

  30. GR LinkerCustom Look

  31. GR LinkerSample

  32. GR LinkerSample

More Related