270 likes | 713 Views
Natural Resource Policies (Chs. 8, 9). Land policy Water policy Environmental policy Energy policy. In natural resource policy areas, the need for policy intervention results from “market failure”. Debates center on market-based solutions vs. government regulatory action.
E N D
Natural Resource Policies (Chs. 8, 9) • Land policy • Water policy • Environmental policy • Energy policy
In natural resource policy areas, the need for policy intervention results from “market failure”. Debates center on market-based solutions vs. government regulatory action. There are fundamentally three general approaches: market allocation, regulations, and incentives.
Land policy • Land use • Agricultural (concern is domestic and global food needs) • Residential (concern is urban sprawl) • Recreation (concern is for amenity use) • Sustainability • Soil conservation • Fragile lands
Land use policy tools • Let markets work • Zoning laws • Govt. purchase of land • Subsidies to move land to other uses (e.g., CRP) • Regulations on use (e.g., sodbuster & swampbuster cross-compliance)
Sustainability (previously labeled “soil conservation”) • Long-standing portion of ag. Policy • Examples of tools/programs • Cost sharing (terraces, brush control) • Soil Bank in 1950s • Conservation Compliance in commodity programs (1985) • “Sodbuster” & “swampbuster” provisions (prevent conversion of erodible land-1985) • CRP (1985)—erosion control; shifted to wetlands preservation in 1995.
Agencies/organizations concerned with sustainability • USDA • U.S. Forest Service • NRCS • U.S. Dept. of the Interior • Bureau of Land Mgmt. • U.S. Parks & Wildlife Service • EPA • RFF
Water Policy • Quantity—availability & allocation among ag., industrial, & commercial/household (municipal) uses • Quality—pollution or degredation of common property • Non-point source pollution of surface & ground water from chemicals & animal wastes
Water policy is primarily state-level policy (water law/ownership varies with states) • At natl. level, mostly legal disputes between states • Some federal subsidization of interstate water projects (dams, canals, servicing navigable waterways); environmental regulations have limited these. • At internatl. level, differences are handled with treaties, agreements
Water policy tools (connected to water rights) • Allocations—priorities often based on “reasonable use” • Regulations—common in water pollution control • Subsidies—for water projects and pollution cleanup • User charges—price on usage • International treaties • Water markets—connected to ownership
Environmental Policy • Led by EPA (est. 1972), but many other agencies/depts. Involved • Most environmental impacts constitute externalities—imposing costs on others. • Often viewed as having 2 main components: • Municipal & industrial wastes • Agricultural wastes
Environmental issues • Water quality—ag. issues are • Pesticides • Animal wastes • Soil erosion • Air quality—ag. issues are • Pesticides • Animal waste odor • Wind erosion • Global warming
Environmental Policy Implementation • Numerous federal, state, & local agencies/groups • Federal (most prominent)—e.g., EPA, USDA • State—e.g., TCEQ, TDA, Tx. Parks & Wildlife, water districts • Local—e.g., parks depts., zoning depts., county soil conservation committees
Environmental policy tools • Penalties—fines, user charges, taxes • Regulations—prohibiting practices, prescribing practices, required performance, cross compliance • Subsidies • Develop markets (requires property rights)
Developing markets (Woodward reading) • Why resort to creating markets? • Resource allocation efficiency • Requirements • Govt. must assign property rights (right for a given amount of emissions, no more) • Permits can be traded (transferrable rights) • Right ensured by govt.
Once a level of environmental quality is defined, trading of emissions rights leads to that result at the least pollution control cost. • It requires that government • Determine quality level and assign rights • Enforce standards and trading rules (These markets will not evolve on their own because there are no prior-defined property rights)
Role of economics in environmental policy debate (Loomis reading) • Problem arises with the trade-off between things whose values are established by society (via markets) and things whose values are not established (e.g., environmental amenities) • Economics can provide means of estimating non-market values so that comparisons are valid.
Non-market valuation • Techniques involve implicit values and/or simulated markets—willingness to pay • Hedonic estimation techniques—statistical estimation from data on amenities • Travel cost method—look at how far people will travel and how much it costs them • Contingent valuation—survey households on how much they would pay for different amounts of something
Energy policy • Relatively recent direct influence on ag. sector—ethanol and biodiesel • Ethanol subsidy since 1978 (now $.51 per gallon as tax exemption) • Biodiesel subsidy since 2005 (tax exemption)
Effects on ag. sector • Changes price relationships among commodities • Changes land use patterns and quantities of various commodities produced • Affects trade flows of commodities (and petroleum) • Affects consumer prices of food (and energy)