420 likes | 583 Views
Developing Potentials for Learning: Evidence, assessment, and progress. John Hattie Visible Learning Lab University of Auckland New Zealand EARLI 2007. Three parts to the story. To identify major influences on achievement (using 700+ meta-analyses)
E N D
Developing Potentials for Learning:Evidence, assessment, and progress John Hattie Visible Learning Lab University of Auckland New Zealand EARLI 2007
Three parts to the story • To identify major influences on achievement (using 700+ meta-analyses) • To outline an assessment model based on these influences • To demonstrate the power and joy of Educational Psychology
The Story • To identify major influences on achievement (using 700+ meta-analyses)
Influences on Achievement ? 0 Decreased Zero Enhanced
Reducing Class Size on Achievement? What is the effect of reducing class size Hundreds of evaluations of reducing class size …. 0 Decreased Zero Enhanced
Effect on Achievement over time? Reducing Class Size .20 1.0 0 Decreased Enhanced Zero
The typical influence on achievement So what is the typical effect across • 750+ meta-analysis • 50,000 studies, and • 200+ million students
Effect on Achievement over time? Typical Effect Size 1.0 0 .20 .40 Decreased Zero Enhanced
Rank these 11 effects: • Reducing disruptive behavior in the class • Feedback • Acceleration of gifted students • Reading Recovery • Integrated curriculum programs • Homework • Individualized instruction • Ability grouping • Open vs. traditional classes • Retention (holding back a year) • Shifting schools (from 1 = highest effect to 11 = lowest effect)
Rank these 11 effects: Answers • Reducing disruptive behavior in the class .86 • Feedback .72 • Acceleration of gifted students .60 • Reading Recovery .50 • Integrated curriculum programs .40 • Homework .30 • Individualized instruction .20 • Ability grouping .10 • Open vs. traditional classes .00 • Retention (hold back a year) -.16 • Shifting schools -.34
Major domains of interest • Curricula • Home • School • Student • Teacher • Teaching
Percentage of Achievement Variance Teachers Students Home Peers Schools Principal Identifying what matters
Visible teaching & Visible learning • What some teachers do! • In active, calculated and meaningful ways • Providing multiple opportunities & alternatives • Teaching learning strategies • Around surface and deep learning • That leads to students constructing learning
Teachers • Clear learning intentions • Challenging success criteria • Range of learning strategies • Know when students are not progressing • Providing feedback • Visibly learns themselves
Students … • Understand learning intentions • Are challenged by success criteria • Develop a range of learning strategies • Know when they are not progressing • Seek feedback • Visibly teach themselves
The Contrast • An active teacher, passionate for their subject and for learning, a change agent OR • A facilitative, inquiry or discovery based provider of engaging activities
An emphasis on learning strategies NS NE ES Creativity Programs 658 814 .70 Teaching student self-verbalization 92 1061 .67 Meta-cognition strategies 43 123 .67 Problem solving teaching 221 719 .61 Study skills 656 2446 .59 Concept mapping 91 105 .52 Motivation on learning 322 979 .48
Message for Learning • Balance of surface, deep, & constructed knowing • Teachers preach deep, students see surface! • Learning strategies • To reduce cognitive load • To use when stuck (welcome error!) • Requires deliberative practice • Builds expectations of “can do” • Thrives on challenge • Requires feedback
Self Regulation • Need surface and deep to maximize meta-cognition • Involves questioning our constructions of knowledge & knowing • Requires highly structured or direct teaching • Is the heart of Visible learning and Visible teaching
Teaching/Teachers needs to be evidence based • Whether their teaching methods have been successful or not • Whether their learning intentions are worthwhile & challenging • Whether students are attaining their desired success criteria • Which students have learnt or not learnt • Where teachers can capitalize on student strengths & minimize gaps • Where students are on the learning ladder • Whether they have a shared conception of progress • What is optimal to teach next Whenever we test in classes it is primarily to help teachers know:
Priority to maximize FEEDBACK to THE TEACHER • Feedback is information provided by an agent (e.g., teacher, peer, book, parent, self/experience) regarding aspects of one’s performance or understanding.
Purpose of feedback • provide alternative strategies to understand material • increase effort, motivation or engagement • confirm that the responses are correct or incorrect • indicate that more information is available or needed • point to directions that could be pursued • to restructure understandings
Feedback is evidence about: • Where am I going? • How am I going? • Where to next?
Developing Potentials for Learning:Evidence, assessment, and progress John Hattie Visible Learning Lab University of Auckland New Zealand EARLI 2007