1 / 23

Carbon Footprint Reduction Potential in Historical Buildings: Innovative Energy Concepts

This research project conducted by Ramon Alberts at Hanze University of Applied Sciences aims to determine the energy and CO2-emission reduction potential of innovative energy concepts in historical buildings. The project investigates the potential impact of various energy conservation and renewable energy solutions on carbon footprint reduction. The findings will be useful for architects, owners, users, and other stakeholders of historical buildings.

burnsr
Download Presentation

Carbon Footprint Reduction Potential in Historical Buildings: Innovative Energy Concepts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ERIC 201319 SeptemberRamon A. Alberts MScr.a.alberts@pl.hanze.nlCarbon Footprint reduction potentialInnovative Energy conceptsHistorical Buildings

  2. Project energetic restoration • Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen • Hanze Research Centre NoorderRuimte • Theme Sustainable Building • SIA RAAK MKB Project • North of the Netherlands • 2 years of research • 4 themes : 5 colleagues • > 40 participating enterprises, owners and governmental organisations • > 50 participating students • > 25 case study projects • Ramon Alberts • Researcher/teacher • EDGAR/CO2-impurities /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  3. Presentation Content • Researchquestion • Research set up ETR-IEC • Research Methodology • Case study building RUG Groningen • Case study building Justice Leeuwarden • Results K-F.I.T Beslis Computer Model • Karakter Cultuur historische waarde; Architectuur- en Kunsthistorische waarde; Situationele en Ensemblewaarde; Gaafheid en Herkenbaarheid, en; Zeldzaamheid • Functie Type; Functie en; Gebruik • Ingreep Toelichting? • Type Afmetingen; Constructie; en Extra (bv lambriseringen, orgel e.d.) Resultaat: in termen van energiewinsten /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  4. Research Question ER-IEC • What is the Energy- and CO2-emission reduction potential of Innovative Energy Concepts in Historical Buildings and how can this potential be shown to the stakeholders, like architects, owners, users and third parties of Historical Buildings? /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  5. Research Setup ER-IEC HG-Research Innovatieve Energie Concepten (IEC’s) R.A. Alberts Companies -Deerns -Degin -Rijksgebouwendienst -RUG -Urban climate Architects -Van Ruysdaal Glas -Bomar -Grontmij -Heymans Servicebouw IEC’s -Trias Energetica 1 -Trias Energetica 2 -Trias Energetica 3 Research ER Results -Reports -Data -Graph’s -Conclusions Case Studies T. v.d. Schoor Building Simulation Software -Vabi-Elements -H.E.N.K. Energy Characteristics B. Boschma Sustainable Project Management M.C. Vieveen Research Question Casestudy Buildings -RUG, Groningen -PvJ, Leeuwarden -Villa Schouwenburg -Villa Zeist Students -L. Claassens -J.A.P. Schamper -E.A. van Veen /International Final Conference Energetic Restoration/ / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  6. Research Methodology Ramon Alberts • Energy data aquisition per Historical Building • Modeling the Historical Building in Building Simulation Software ( BSS) to determine the Status Quo energy consumption • Modeling many Innovative Energy Concepts (IEC’s), according to the Trias Energetica to determine the Energy Consumption per separate IEC • Modeling combinations of IEC’s in the BSS to determine: • Scenario A: Pay Back Time < Technical Life Time; Minimum CO2-emission reduction • Scenario B: Pay Back Time ≈ Technical Life Time; Medium CO2-emission reduction • Scenario C: Pay Back Time > Technical Life Time; Maximum CO2-emission reduction • Modeling the scenario’s in the goals of the Kyoto Protocol, listed in the Dutch MJA3-regulations to determine the Carbon Footprint reduction potential of existing IEC’s in Historical Buildings /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  7. Innovative energy Concepts Trias Energetica 1( Reduction of Energy Use): • Wall-, Roof-, Ground-isolation; 70-100-150 [mm] PUR/ Rockwool • Window: Single-/ Double glazing, Foil, HR+/++/+++ • Sun protection systems, Shutters Trias Energetica 2( Production of Sustainable Energy): • Solar: PV, BIPV, Solar collectors • HP(Heat Pump): Air-Air, Air-Water, Water-Water, Gas Absorbtion • CHP( Combined Heat Power) • Wood Pellet CH( Central Heating) Trias Energetica 3( More efficiënt use of Fossil Energy): • Floor Heating • Cooling/ Fan coil units/ Condensor • Zone HVAC(Heating, Ventilation and Cooling) • Lighting: HF-TL, Led • Domotica: Area-, Presence- and Condition- Control /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  8. Case Study Building RUG/ Groningen • RUG- State University Groningen; Faculty of Literature; Boteringenstraat 23-25;Groningen; Previous House with the 13 Temples; Rebuild in 1710; Rococo embellishments 1756; Restoration 1964 /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  9. Case Study Building RUG/ Groningen • Building geometry model of the RUG-building in Vabi-Elements /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  10. Status Quo RUG-building Ramon Alberts RUG Faculty of Literature Utilities Energy use (E) Primary Energy use (Epri) CH4 = 26.959[m3/y] 855 (83%) [GJ/y] 1082 (65%) [GJ/y] Elek. = 49.240 [kWh/y] 177 (17%) [GJ/y] 585 (35%) [GJ/y] H2O = 219 [m3/y] - - Total Energy 1.032 (100%) [GJ/y] 1.667 (162%) [GJ/y] Total Energy/ m2 (GFA) 510 (100%) [MJ/m2.y] 824(162%) [MJ/y.m2 (GFA)] Total CO2/ m2( GFA) 39 (100%) KG(CO2)/m2(GFA) GFA=Gross Floor Area = 2.022 [m2]; NFA=Net Floor Area = 1.484 [m2]; 1 [kWh] = 3,6 [MJ] => 11,9( factor 3,3) [MJ(pri.)] 1 [m3 CH4] = 31,7 [MJ] => 44,5( factor 1,3) [MJ(pri.) /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  11. IEC’s for RUG-building Ramon Alberts /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  12. Simulation results RUG/IEC’s Ramon Alberts /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  13. Case Study Building Justice/Leeuwarden • Palace of Justice; Wilhelminaplein 1; Leeuwarden; Design City architect Thomas Romein; Neo-Greece Style; Build from 1846-1852; Renovated in 2013. /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  14. Case Study Building Justice/Leeuwarden • Building geometry model of the Palace of Justice in Vabi-Elements /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  15. Energy data Building of Justice . /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  16. Building simulation of IEC’s Palace of Justice • . /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  17. Scenario simulation Palace of Justice . GFA=Gross Floor Area = 4558[m2]; NFA=Net Floor Area = 3897[m2]; 1 [kWh] = 3,6 [MJ] => 11,9( factor 3,3) [MJ(pri.)] 1 [m3 CH4] = 31,7 – 35,2[MJ] => 44,5( factor 1,3) [MJ(pri.) Wood pellets[kg] => 18 [MJ (pri.)]( with:1,98{( 11%)MJ] Fossil Energy and 16,02( 89%)[MJ] Renewable Energy /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  18. Scenario simulation Palace of Justice . /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  19. Case Study Building Justice/Leeuwarden MJA3: Scenario A /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  20. Case Study Building Justice/Leeuwarden MJA3: Scenario B • Red- Primary Fossil Energy • Green- Sustainable Energy • Black- Fossil CO2-emission /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  21. Case Study Building Justice/Leeuwarden MJA3: Scenario C /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  22. Results ER-IEC . /ERIC 2013 / Research ER-IEC/ Ir. R.A.Alberts/

  23. Thank Youforyour attentionAny questions?

More Related