230 likes | 355 Views
U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission Rio Grande and Tijuana River Flood Control Projects Programmatic EIS. USIBWC Flood Control Projects.
E N D
U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission Rio Grande and Tijuana River Flood Control Projects Programmatic EIS
USIBWC Flood Control Projects • USIBWC intends to prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for management activities of flood control projects in the U.S. portions of the Rio Grande and Tijuana Rivers • Management activities may include: • Structural activities (construction) • Non-structural activities (maintenance) • Collaboration with other agencies and landowners
Why a Programmatic EIS? • Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Encourages a Tiered Process: • Per CFR 1502.20 • Coverage of a program or plan in a broader EIS is called a Programmatic EIS (PEIS) • Subsequent narrower EAs or EIS’s for specific projects
Recent USIBWC EIS’s • PEIS and EIS Relationship • Incorporate information already developed • Status of Canalization EIS • Record of Decision
NEPA Process - PEIS Proposed Agency Action S c o p i n g P r o c e s s Identification of Stakeholders Public Notification Scoping Meetings Development of Alternatives PublicParticipation Draft PEIS Stakeholders Public Hearings Respond to and Incorporate Comments Final PEIS Stakeholders Record ofDecision
USIBWC Projects • USIBWC manages four flood control projects along the Rio Grande • Canalization Project – Percha Dam to American Dam • Rectification Project – El Paso to Ft. Quitman • Presidio-Ojinaga Project • Lower Rio Grande Project – From Peñitas to the Gulf of Mexico • USIBWC manages the Tijuana River Flood Control Project (U.S. portion)
Program Purpose and Need • The purpose of the proposed federal action is to: • Identify and evaluate alternatives for the management of existing projects • Assist USIBWC to comply with its mandate for flood protection, water deliveries, and/or boundary stabilization • Identify opportunities to enhance environmental resources • Coordinate with other entities in the development of recreational opportunities
Alternatives are organized around different themes Flood Control Water Supply Riparian Habitat Aquatic Habitat Recrea- tion Water Quality Rip Hab Wat Qual Wat Qual Recrea. Recrea- tion Recrea. Water Quality Aquatic Habitat Alternatives Flood Control Riparian Habitat Rip Hab Aquatic Hab Water Supply Flood Control Fl Control Water Sup Flood Control Recreation Habitats Restoration Strategies Method
Formulation process • Identify objectives and performance measures • Flood control • Water supply • Environmental enhancement • Recreational opportunities • Implementability (cost, social impacts) • Inter-agency cooperation
Formulation process • Identify ‘concepts’ organized by objective • Flood control and water deliveries: levee improvements, sediment control • Environmental enhancement: native vegetation management, diversify habitat • Recreational opportunities: coordination with adjacent parks, trails • Implementability: cost, acceptance • Interagency cooperation: Border Patrol activities
Formulation process • Initial screening of concepts based on fatal flaw analysis • Identify flood control issues/problem areas • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers levee survey • Previous hydraulic modeling • Previous alternative formulations & analyses • USIBWC experience
Formulation process • Identify water delivery issues/problem areas • USIBWC experience • Sediment control • Divide river into ‘River Management Units’ or similar concept • Identify environmental enhancement and recreational opportunities by RMU
Formulation process • Formulate alternatives based on: • Flood control issues and needs • Water supply issues and needs • Environmental enhancement opportunities • Recreational opportunities • Evaluate alternatives based on objectives and performance measures
Biological Resources Water Resources Air Quality Land Use / Agricultural Issues Urban / Energy Issues Recreational Resources Environmental Resource Categories • Cultural Resources • Indian Tribal Lands • Environmental Justice • Visual Resources • Regional Economics • Public Health / Environmental Hazards
Types of Environmental Impacts • Direct • e.g., vegetation removal • Indirect • e.g., increase in water temperature • Short-term • e.g., fugitive dust from construction • Long-term • e.g., promote native vegetation • Cumulative • resulting from proposed and other actions in project area
Impacts on Biological Resources • Assess Impacts to • Habitats • Aquatic • Riparian • Terrestrial • Species • Ecologically important • T&E • State special concern
Impacts on Biological Resources • Assess Impacts from • Water Quality • Water Quantity • Sediment/Soil Quality • Habitat Loss/Degradation • Construction • Vegetation removal • Sedimentation • Invasive/Exotic Species
Next Steps • Complete Scoping Process – Early 2005 • Preparation of Draft PEIS – Most of 2005 • Public/Agency Review of Draft PEIS – Late 2005 • Public Hearings – Late 2005 • Final PEIS – Early 2006 • Record of Decision – Early 2006