90 likes | 100 Views
Explore the State CP Model for e-signing services, influenced by citizen CRM and developed in the government community. This policy-driven approach focuses on improving state infrastructure for efficient service delivery. Learn about the technology basis, limitations, and opportunities associated with this e-signing tool. Visit the provided link for more insights.
E N D
State CP Model(“Discussion Draft”) Snowmass PKI Summit Art Vandenberg Advanced Campus Services Georgia State University
A Summary • State CP Model: not a CP for public key certificates, but a policy for e-signing? • Influenced by State activities in Citizen CRM • Driven top-down • PKI isn’t “the” e-signing solution • PKI is a tool, not the end • “Discussion Draft” State CP
Context of e-sign services • Providing signing services - as in contracts and agreements • Perhaps limited need for interoperation • Looks to cross certification as solution to lesser problem: • State to state in regional context • With Federal agencies • On a scale of 50 states, not 4000+ universities State CP
One OID for Policy • Single level of assurance mapping • Defines limited application area for certs • Works in the “enterprise mode” of a State environment? (applications understand the certs and assurances) • Think of it as a “PKI-Lite” approach • It is a “Draft” – change is an option State CP
Developed in the Community • NECCC (National Electronic Commerce Coordinating Council) • State Auditors, Procurement officers, Secretaries of State, Governors, Chief Administrators… and CIO • Focus on improving State infrastructure for government SERVICES • PKI is not the end, but a tool State CP
Technology Basis • States do not enjoy higher ed’s connectivity • Broadband initiatives: Internet is still being developed (much less Internet2/Abilene…) • Digital Divide: enfranchising the people (just like in our dorms!) • Anonymity is not the issue – States expect to know identity of citizens applying for services • Privacy means: “How’re you using my data?” State CP
Bottom Line • Top down approach to e-signing • Specifically limited cert application: • Confidentiality/encryption • Digital signing (medium & high • Digital Notary • Not Anonymous • Strengths: governing law, auditing, financial responsibility, liability/risk, operational • Opportunity to link efforts State CP
Other observations • NECCC Activities a Clue: • Broadband • Digital divide • Portals • Justice Agencies Sharing Initiative • Privacy • Funding State CP
Internet2-like Activities • The Center for Technology in Government to search for e-government best practices. • http://www.civic.com/civic/articles/2001/0604/web-ctg-06-08-01.asp • Practitioners of e-government have the promise of a road map in their quest to implement best practices. State CP