570 likes | 734 Views
Adam Kilgarriff. Web Corpora. You can’t help noticing. Replaceable or replacable? http://googlefight.com. Very very large 2006 estimates for duplicate free, linguistic, Google-indexed web German: 44 billion words Italian: 25 billion words English: 1,000 billion -10,000 billion words
E N D
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Adam Kilgarriff Web Corpora
Kilgarriff: Web corpora You can’t help noticing • Replaceable or replacable? • http://googlefight.com
Kilgarriff: Web corpora • Very very large • 2006 estimates for duplicate free, linguistic, Google-indexed web • German: 44 billion words • Italian: 25 billion words • English: 1,000 billion -10,000 billion words • Most languages • Most language types • Up-to-date • Free • Instant access
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Overview • Is the web a corpus? • Representativeness • What is out there? • Web1T • Googleology • Web corpus types • Targeted sites: Oxford English Corpus • General: WaC family • WebBootCaT
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Is the web a corpus? • Sinclair • in “Developing linguistic corpora, a guide to good practice. Corpus and Text – Basic Principles” “…not a corpus because • dimensions unknown, constantly changing • not designed from a linguistic perpective • But • We can find out dimensions • Many corpora are not designed • “as much chatroom dialogue as I can get” • Def: a corpus is a collection of texts • when viewed as an object of language research
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Is the web a corpus? Yes
Kilgarriff: Web corpora but it’s not representative
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Theory A random sample of a population is representative of it. Observations on sample support inferences about population (within confidence bounds)
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Theory A random sample of a population is … • What is the population? • production and reception • speech and text • copying
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Theory • Population not defined • Representative sample not possible
Kilgarriff: Web corpora sublanguage • Language = core + sublanguages • Options for corpus construction • none • some • all • None • impoverished view of language • Some: BNC • cake recipes and gastro-uterine disease • not car repair manuals or astronomy or … • All: until recently, not viable
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Representativeness • The web is not representative • but nor is anything else • Text type variation • under-researched, lacking in theory • Atkins Clear Ostler 1993 on design brief for BNC; Biber 1988, Kilgarriff 2001 • Text type is an issue across NLP • Web: issue is acute because, as against BNC or WSJ, we simply don’t know what is there
Kilgarriff: Web corpora What is out there? • What text types are there on the web? • some are new: chatroom • proportions • is it overwhelmed by porn? How much? • Hard question
Kilgarriff: Web corpora • The web • a social, cultural, political phenomenon • new, little understood • a legitimate object of science • mostly language • we are well placed • a lot of people will be interested • Let’s • study the web • source of language data • apply our tools for web use (dictionaries, MT) • use the web as infrastructure
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Using Search Engines No setup costs Start querying today Methods • Hit counts • ‘snippets’ • Metasearch engines, WebCorp • Find pages and download
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Googleology • Google hit counts for language modelling • Example: (Keller & Lapata 2003) • 36 queries to estimate freq(fulfil, obligation) to each of Google and Altavista • Very interesting work • Great interest in query syntax
Kilgarriff: Web corpora The Trouble with Google • not enough instances • max 1000 • not enough queries • max 1000 per day with API • not enough context • 10-word snippet around search term • sort order • search term in titles and headings • untrustworthy hit counts • limited search options • linguistically dumb, eg not lemmatised • aime/aimer/aimes/aimons/aimez/aiment …
Kilgarriff: Web corpora • Appeal • Zero-cost entry, just start googling • Reality • High-quality work: high-cost methodology
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Also: • No replicability • Methods, stats not published • At mercy of commercial corporation • Googleology is bad science
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Better: web-sourced corpora • Gather pages • Google hits • Select and gather whole sites • General crawl • Filter • De-duplicate • Linguistic processing • Load into corpus tool
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Oxford English Corpus • Whole domains chosen and harvested • control over text type • 2.3 billion words
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Oxford English Corpus
Kilgarriff: Web corpora WaC family • 1.5 B words each • Baroni and colleagues • Seeds: • mid-frequency words from ‘core vocab’ lists and corpora • Google on seed words, then crawl
Kilgarriff: Web corpora TenTen Family • Processing chain • Spiderling, a lingustic crawler • A billion words a day • jusText for“cleaning”: removing non-text • Onion – remove duplicates (paragraph level) • All major world languages • 2-20 billion words • Lexical Computing • All available in Sketch Engine
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Small, specialised corpora • Terminologists • Translators needing target-language domain-specific vocab • Specialist dictionaries • Don’t exist • Expensive/inaccessible • Out of date
Kilgarriff: Web corpora BootCat (Bootstrapping Corpora and Terms) • Put in seed terms • Google/Yahoo search • Retrieve Google/Yahoo hits • Remove duplicates, boilerplate • Small instant corpora • Baroni and Bernardini, LREC 2004 • Web version • WebBootCaT • At Sketch Engine site
Kilgarriff: Web corpora But did I make a good corpus?
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Bad Science • Ben Goldacre
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Bad Science • Ben Goldacre • Biases in samples • A quarter of the people who tested positive had just been on holiday in Mexico • But the research team didn’t notice
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Bad linguistics • Our corpus study shows X • But what was in the corpus?
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Bad linguistics • Our corpus study shows X • But what was in the corpus? • Moral: • Get to know your corpus
Kilgarriff: Web corpora How? • Read it? • Too big to read • Not designed to be read
Kilgarriff: Web corpora How? • Compare it with other(s) • Keyword lists
Kilgarriff: Web corpora UKWaC vs. enTenTen12
Kilgarriff: Web corpora enTenTen vs. UKWaC accord actually amendment among bad because behavior believe bill blog ca center citizen color defense determine do dollar earth effort election even evil fact faculty favor favorite federal foreign forth guess guy he her him himself his honor human kid kill kind know labor law let liberal like man maybe me military movie my nation never nor not nothing official oh organization percent political post president pretty professor program realize recognize say shall she sin soul speak state suppose tell terrorist that thing think thou thy toward true truth unto upon violation vote voter war what while why woman yes accommodation achieve advice aim area assessment available band behaviourbuilding centre charity click client club colour consultation contact council delivery detail develop development disabled email enable enquiry ensure event excellent facility favourite full further garden guidance guide holiday improve information insurance join link local main manage management match mm nd offer opportunity organisationorganisepage partnership please pm poker ppprogramme project pub pupil quality range rdrealiserecognise road route scheme sector service shop site skill specialist st staff stage suitable telephone th top tour training transport uk undertake venue village visit visitor website welcome whilst wide workshop www
Kilgarriff: Web corpora enTenTen vs. UKWaC accord actually amendment among bad because behaviorbelieve bill blog cacenter citizen color defense determine do dollar earth effort election even evil fact faculty favor favorite federal foreign forth guess guy he her him himself his honor human kid kill kind know laborlaw let liberal like man maybe me military movie my nation never nor not nothing official oh organization percent political post president pretty professor programrealizerecognize say shall she sin soul speak state suppose tell terrorist that thing think thou thy toward true truth unto upon violation vote voter war what while why woman yes accommodation achieve advice aim area assessment available band behaviourbuilding centre charity click client club colour consultation contact council delivery detail develop development disabled email enable enquiry ensure event excellent facility favourite full further garden guidance guide holiday improve information insurance join link local main manage management match mm nd offer opportunity organisationorganisepage partnership please pm poker ppprogramme project pub pupil quality range rdrealiserecogniseroad route scheme sector service shop site skill specialist st staff stage suitable telephone th top tour training transport uk undertake venue village visit visitor website welcome whilst wide workshop www
Kilgarriff: Web corpora enTenTen vs. UKWaC accord actually amendment among bad because behaviorbelieve bill blog cacenter citizen color defense determine do dollar earth effort election even evil fact faculty favor favorite federal foreign forth guess guy he her him himself his honor human kid kill kind know labor law let liberal like man maybe me military movie my nation never nor not nothing official oh organization percent political post president pretty professor programrealizerecognize say shall she sin soul speak state suppose tell terrorist that thing think thou thy toward true truth unto upon violation vote voter war what while why woman yes accommodation achieve advice aim area assessment available band behaviourbuilding centre charity click client club colour consultation contact council delivery detail develop development disabled email enable enquiry ensure event excellent facilityfavouritefull further garden guidance guide holiday improve information insurance joinlink local main manage management match mm nd offer opportunity organisationorganisepage partnership please pm poker ppprogramme project pub pupil quality range rdrealiserecogniseroad route scheme sector service shop site skill specialist st staff stage suitable telephone th top tour training transport uk undertake venue village visit visitor website welcome whilst wide workshop www
Kilgarriff: Web corpora enTenTen vs. UKWaC accord actually amendmentamong bad because behaviorbelievebill blog cacentercitizencolor defense determine do dollar earth effort election even evil fact faculty favor favoritefederal foreign forth guess guy he her him himself his honor human kid kill kind know laborlaw letliberallike man maybe me military movie my nation never nor not nothing official oh organization percent political post president pretty professor programrealizerecognize say shall she sin soul speakstatesuppose tell terrorist that thing think thou thy toward true truth unto upon violation vote voter war what while why woman yes accommodation achieve advice aim area assessment available bandbehaviourbuilding centre charity click client club colour consultation contact council delivery detail develop development disabled email enable enquiry ensure event excellent facilityfavouritefull further garden guidance guide holiday improve information insurance joinlink local main manage management match mm nd offer opportunity organisationorganisepage partnership please pm poker ppprogramme project pub pupil quality range rdrealiserecogniseroad route scheme sector service shop site skill specialist st staff stage suitable telephone th top tour training transport uk undertake venue village visit visitor website welcome whilst wide workshop www
Kilgarriff: Web corpora enTenTen vs. UKWaC • Core verbs • be determine do guess know let say shall suppose tell think • Pronouns • he her him his me my she • Biber: more informal
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Judgements • Not all or nothing • Both have (lots of) AmE and BrE • Observing patterns • Not right or wrong • Where does ‘believe’ belong? • Bible or core verbs? • No right answer, could be both • The better you know the data, the better you understand why words are there
Kilgarriff: Web corpora The maths “this word is twice as common here as there” • Simplest approach • Normalise frequencies • Per thousand, or per million • Take ratio • For examples • Assume two 1m-word corpora • Normalisation not needed • Fc=focus corpus • Rc= reference corpus
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Problem 1: You can’t divide by zero • Standard solution: add one • Problem solved
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Problem 2: High ratios more common, less interesting for rarer words • ratio is not enough: frequency matters too Also • some researchers: grammar, grammar words • some researchers: lexis, content words No right answer Slider?
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Solution • Don’t just add 1, add n: • n=1 • n=100
Kilgarriff: Web corpora • n=1000
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Summary
Kilgarriff: Web corpora But what about • Mutual information • Log-likelihood • Chi-square • Fisher’s test • … • Don’t they use cleverer maths?
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Yes but • Clever maths is for hypothesis testing • Can you defeat null hypothesis? • Language is not random, so • … you always can • Null hypothesis never true • Hypothesis-testing not informative • Clever maths irrelevant • Kilgarriff 2006, CLLT
Kilgarriff: Web corpora Varying the parameter • BAWE • British Academic Written English • Nesi and Thompson 2008 • Student essays • Arts/Humanities, Social Sciences, Life Sciences, Physical Sciences • fc: ArtsHum, rc: SocSci • With n=10 and n=1000