1 / 12

Mercury Control for Power Plants

Presented to the 2003 Annual ACERC Conference Salt Lake City, UT February 20, 2003. Mercury Control for Power Plants. Arun Mehta, George Offen, Ramsay Chang, Richard Rhudy. EPRI Mercury Control R&D Program.

cael
Download Presentation

Mercury Control for Power Plants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presented to the 2003 Annual ACERC Conference Salt Lake City, UT February 20, 2003 Mercury Control for Power Plants Arun Mehta, George Offen, Ramsay Chang, Richard Rhudy

  2. EPRI Mercury Control R&D Program • Program started with developing understanding of factors affecting mercury emissions • Studies of flue gas parameters controlling the effectiveness of control strategies • Development & demonstration of a range of options

  3. Key Partners • Power Producers Allegheny, Cinergy, Duke Power, First Energy, GRE, LG&E, Minnesota Power, MidAmercan Energy Co, NIPSCo, Ontario Power Generation, PG&E NEG, PSEG, Southern Company, TVA, TXU, We Energies, Xcel • Agencies NETL/DOE, EPA, ICCI, NDIC • Contractors and Laboratories ADA-ES, Apogee, EERC, ISGS, URS • Suppliers • Hamon RC, Norit, EnviroCare, EEC

  4. Mercury Reductions for Power Plants – Performance Overview -- Bituminous • 20-95%, depending on NOx, SO2 control • SD/BH or SCR/FGD with high Cl  highest Hg • Options to increase Hg removal • Activated carbon injection (ACI) furthest developed • Oxidation catalysts or chemical additives may increase capture by SO2 controls – under development • SCR catalyst age and size may not be critical factors (?) • Re-emissions is growing concern

  5. Mercury Reductions for Power Plants – Performance Overview – Low Rank Coals • Typically Hg < 25% • Includes plants with SO2 control • ACI again furthest developed, but • Ahead of ESP < 60-70% • Ahead of FF??? Tests planned 2003 • SD/BH impedes ACI performance • Possible solutions • Oxidation catalysts ahead of SO2 control • Chemical additives to enhance capture in SO2 control or via ACI • Fixed structures coated with sorptive material

  6. Full-scale ACI Test Sites *DOE-NETL PRDA Projects

  7. Field Results – Hg By ACI Ahead of ESPs 90 80 Full-Scale Test (Lo S Bit) Full-Scale Test (PRB) 70 60 50 Hg Removal (%) Full-Scale Test (Hi S Bit) 40 30 Pilot Sites (8) 20 $7M/yr for 500MW 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Injection Concentration (lb/Macf)

  8. SD-BH ReducedEffectiveness of ACI 100 Average BH 90 80 70 FGD, SD + BH 60 HOK, SD + BH % Hg Removal 50 LAC, SD + BH 40 IAC, SD + BH 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 Injection Concentration (lb/MMacf)

  9. Hgo Oxidation Activity (Sub-Bituminous Coal)

  10. Mercury Removal Across Wet Scrubber Dependent on Salt Chemical Type • Potential impacts • Air heater pluggage • Opacity increase • Scrubber water chloride increase

  11. Carbon honeycomb Parallel Plates with sorbent surface Gas Flow MerCAPTM Concepts • Currently focusing on post SD/BH with W. fuels • 10’ plates believe  90% Hg • Developmental technology

  12. Mercury Control: What Next?Next? • Long-term (3 months to one year) full-scale ACI tests (withNETL/DOE) • EPRI actively seeking partners – hosts and contractors • Short-term full-scale ACI/chemical injection tests on western fuels • Emerging technologies (some with NETL/DOE) • Chemical additives • MerCAP™ and other fixed structures/beds • Novel sorbents (from EPA, EPRI, others) • Mercury oxidation catalyst field pilot testing • Other concepts, IECs?

More Related