Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium

1. Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited NCOIC-DefDaily-KC20100917

2. NCOIC is a Unique Organization NCOIC exists to facilitate the global realization of Network Centric Operations &Net Enabled Capability.  We seek to enable interoperability across joint, interagency,intergovernmental, and multinational industrial & commercial operations.  • Global Organization • Voice of industry & governments • Cadre of technical experts • Dedicated to interoperability • Advisory Council of senior advisors who help prioritize our work in a non-competitive environment In the photo: BrigGen Dieter Dammjacob (DEU AF)-J3 NATO Supreme Headquarters, Allied Powers Europe; Lt.Col. Danut Tiganus-CIS Directorate, EU Military Staff; Dr. Tom Buckman-NC3A Chief Architect; Gen Harald Kujat,-German AF (Ret.) former Chief of Staff of German Armed Forces & head of NATO Military Committee, Marcel Staicu-European Defense Agency NEC Project Officer .

3. NCOIC Members • 80+ Member Organizations including leading IT and Aerospace & Defense companies, government organizations, non-governmental organizations and academic institutions • Members from 18 Countries • Advisors from 26 key stakeholders from Australia, EDA, France, Germany, Italy, NATO, The Netherlands, Sweden, UK & US Working Group collaboration Executive and Advisory Council joint meeting Technical Council Terry Morgan honors outgoing Advisory Council Chair, Keith Hall

4. Sustained Effort to Make NCOIC Products Part of Procurement Process Overarching Goal: NCOIC deliverables are adopted, used and required by customer agencies • All Advisory Council Members • US DefenseScience Board Adopt Use Participate Advise 2004/2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 • NATO • C3 IPT • NCA FT • DISA (US) • CRADA • OSWG • NCAT • OSD-NII (US) • NCAT • OSWG • Cybersecurity • FAA/JPDO (US) • Aviation IPT (NextGen/NEO) • MOD (UK) • NATO C2COE NRF • NCAT • USAF SPACECOM • NCAT • FAA/Eurocontrol • SCOPE/NCAT/Patterns • FAA OTA • US DoD • Net-CentricAttributes • Australian DoD • SCOPE/NCAT • Patterns/BBs • EDA • NCAT • US DOD/DAU • Aus DoD/RPDE NCOIC is Pursuing Plans to Further Increase Influencein Future Procurements

5. NCOIC Key DeliverablesAddressing Inter-Agency, Cross-Industry Gaps • Systems, Capabilities, Operations, Programs, & Enterprises (SCOPE) Model • Characterization of commercial, civil, and government requirements for interoperable systems • NCOIC Interoperability Framework™ (NIF) and Net-Centric Patterns • Recommendations for open standards and their patterns of use to obtain interoperable systems • Building Blocks • Catalog of COTS & GOTS open standards based products compliant with NIF recommendations • Network Centric Analysis Tool™ (NCAT) • Netcentric analysis of system architectures, including System-of-Systems and Federation of Systems architectures • NCOIC Lexicon • A glossary of terms and definitions that lay the foundation for meaningful discussions. Provides a common language for the disparity of ideas concerning key terms, including "NCO.“ • Systems Engineering best practices and processes • These best practices and processes include tools, process and maturity models, modeling techniques, test & evaluation techniques, and collaborative environments for NCOIC integration. These products, combined with NCOIC member expertise in NCO/NEC,measure Netcentric capabilities, requirements, gapsand provide recommendations for interoperability

6. Unity of EffortDifferent Domains, Similar Needs Maritime IPT Net Enabled Emergency Response IPT Aviation IPT C3 Interoperability IPT Cyber Security IPT SystemsEngineering and Integration Modeling and Simulation BuildingBlocks Net-CentricAttributes NCOICInteroperabilityFramework Specialized Frameworks • Information Assurance • Cloud Computing • Mobile Networking • System Management • Semantic Interoperability • Information, Services, etc. • ConformanceCertification • Test &Evaluation • Lexicon • Education& Outreach SCOPE NIF & Concepts, Principles, Processes, PATTERNS NCAT Functional Teams provide the technical expertise to serve customer domains.The Integrated Project Teams provide operational information from customer domain perspectives.

7. NCOIC and InteroperabilityConsiderations in Architecture • NCOIC considers Interaction of People, Processes,and Technology in a Net-Centric Environment • Technical considerations are important, but… • PEOPLE have to be culturally prepared to use it • PROCESSES have to be consistent with thetechnology used • Embodied in NCOIC’s Interoperability Model • One typical limiting factor! Cyber Security needs in aCyberspace Ecosystem • Classic Information Assurance factors (for Systems, Services, Networks, Information, etc. “Assured” at some Level of Trust) • Multiple National Policies and Legal Constraints (many conflict!) • Many Domain-Specific needs and difference in priorities/emphasis! • Growing concern regarding dependence on Cyberspace with corresponding vulnerability to attack, catastrophe, etc. Interoperability of GLOBAL system implementations across joint, interagency,intergovernmental, and multinational industrial & commercial operations is key!

8. Traditional Architecture ApproachesNot Sufficient for Cyberspace Ecosystem • Some Traditional Security Mechanisms vs. Cyber Security Needs: • “Need to Know” vs. “Need to Share” • Point-to-Point Networks vs. Global Internet • Risk Adverse vs. Managed Risk • Some Traditional Defense vs. Cyberspace Ecosystem Architectures: • Tightly-coupled Systems/Networks vs. SOA / Cloud Computing Public and/or Private Clouds providingInfrastructure-as-a-Service,Platform-as-a-Service,Software-as-a-Service • Systems vs. System-of-Systems vs. Federation-of-Systems Controlled vs. ad hoc composition and interaction • Organizational Policy Enforcement vs. Enterprise Governance

9. Architectural Considerations forU.S. FAA Next GenerationAir Traffic Management System https://nasea.faa.gov/ TODAY • General Benefits of an Enterprise Architectureand SOA approach • Business Benefits to an Individual Program • Engineering Benefitsto the FAA Enterprise • Utilization of common standards, both national and global • Global harmonization across Agencies • Common Operating Picture across domains • Sensor Grid for tracking, weather, etc. • Interoperability between ground and airborne, ocean,enroute,terminal, air systems • Support for disparate development environments throughuse of a common foundation across the enterprise • Modeling of interactions, dependencies and connectivitythroughout the enterprise

10. Architectural Considerations forAustralia Defense OrganizationSingle Information Environment (SIE) http://www.defence.gov.au/cio/_lib/doc/Single_Information_Environment.pdf Services Application Application Application Application Application Application Services Logic Logic Logic Data Data Data Data Data Data Data Manual Orchestration Manual Orchestration Automated Orchestration Separate Interfaces Converged Interface Converged Interface Technology Change Business Change Challenge: Can NCOIC SCOPE Tool help in optimizing the SIE Architecture?

11. SCOPE for SIE:Characterize Architecture Tradeoffs A PROJECT B ? COMMON Grow Common Services? ? ? PROJECT PROJECT A A CORPORATE PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT B B A PROJECT D B COMMON COMMON Modify Project A or B? Custom Bridgebetween A and B? WARFIGHTER INTELLIGENCE PROJECT PROJECT A PROJECT B C COMMON

12. Net-EnabledFuture Stovepiped Systems, Point-to-PointNetworks

13. BACK UP

14. Why NCOIC is Good for Business • Provides direct access to broad global customer base at thehighest level, and entrée to others through NCOIC relationships • Provides access to potential partners, suppliers and competitors for NCO business • Illustrates global thought leadership & consensus with international stakeholders on NCO/NEC • No compromise of national or alliance interests • Industry consensus on NCO standards beneath the application layer reduces cost, provides for more efficient design and effective partnering • Certification program will validate interoperability of systems within defined parameters “Like organizations that pioneered the Internet, NCOIC sponsors innovative thought, conducts critical analyses, and demonstrates how a net-centric environment can bring interoperability to a broad range of sectors. In this way, NCOIC helps member companies to find new markets, evaluate their unique needs and explore ways to drive interoperability into those markets.” Terry Morgan, Cisco.

15. Global Stakeholders CDR Fred van Ettinger, (NLD N) C2 Centre of Excellence, signs Letter of Agreement with NCOIC • “The Australian Department of Defence is a keen supporter of NCOIC, its principles and tools. We aim to apply NCOIC’s products to our acquisition process to better define interoperability requirements and improve through-life systems integration prospects.” John McGarry, Australian Air Commodore. • "We have used NCOIC’s NCAT tool to assess levels of interoperability during NATO Response Force exercises. Our Centre of Excellence found the tool to be very useful in establishing the level of interoperability." Commander Fred van Ettinger, Section Head of the Multi National Command and Control Centre of Excellence. • “NCOIC has four characteristics which make it unique. The organization is solely dedicated to network-centric operations and interoperability; its membership stimulates discussions about global interoperability; it serves as a ‘vendor neutral’ forum, and it has a cadre of industry’s top technical experts who are available to do its work.” Jack Zavin, U.S. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Networks and Information Integration. Members speak with Carlo Magrassi, European Defence Agency Armaments Director Members develop a SCOPE workshop for Australian Department of Defence with Rapid Prototyping Development & Evaluation organization

16. Benefits of Membership • “From NCOIC members and senior government advisors, we continue to learn how to improve the world we know today. And we are overwhelmed with opportunities to see the way network-centric operations can shape the future.” USAF Lt.Gen. (Ret.) Harry Raduege, Chairman of the Deloitte Center for Cyber Innovation. • “Consortium leaders gain insight about the direction of a customer’s vision and the potential network-centric business opportunity,” he says. “They’re in a better position to see the future, take a hand in shaping it and place their company’s bets on new solutions, more precisely.”Terry Morgan, Cisco. • “People who operate in one market segment adopt a model about how the world works--that can lead to a mental rut. But NCOIC members come from many sectors and have opinions that don’t always agree with your own. Within the context of such a collaborative environment, diverse thinking can be a catalyst for innovation.” Hans Polzer, Senior Fellow, Lockheed Martin. • “Achieving interoperability among systems is huge work and there are national political barriers. When NCOIC members work together as transnational companies these obstacles diminish—even though the companies can only discuss non-sensitive issues— but they can focus on real technical difficulties. NCOIC is then by far the best forum for ongoing conversations about interoperability. Outside this forum, when national customers have more influence, such collaboration would be much more difficult.” Dr. Claude Roche, EADS Defence & Security and NCOIC Executive Council member. • “We are a global society and the next series of potential problems—civil wars, scarce water, food shortages, pandemics, cyber warfare—cannot be resolved by one nation. To avoid catastrophic outcomes our only chance is to cooperate. We have incredible motivation to work together and NCOIC is making significant contributions to the technological foundation that will help nations collaborate.” Brett Biddington, Cisco Systems’Global Government Solutions Group.

17. NCOIC Members Tier 1 Members • Boeing • Cisco Systems • Deloitte & Touche • EADS • Northrop Grumman • Raytheon • Thales • Finmeccanica • IBM • ITT Corporation • Lockheed Martin Tier 2 Members • Harris Corporation • L-3 Communications 17

18. NCOIC Members Tier 3 Members • ABG SPIN • ADIESA • The Aerospace Corporation • American Red Cross • ASELSAN • Association for Enterprise Integration • Australian Department of Defence • BAE Systems • CACI • Carillo Business Technologies • Carnegie Mellon University SEI • Center For Netcentric Product Research • Ciena Government Solutions • COMCARE • Computer Sciences Corporation • Dataline, LLC • DCNS • EDISOFT • Emergency Interoperability Consortium • MITRE • NetCentOps, LLC • NJVC • OASD (NII)/DoD CIO • Object Management Group • Objective Interface Systems • Open Geospatial Consortium • Real-Time Innovations • Rheinmetall Defence Electronics • Rockwell Collins • RUAG Electronics • Saab • The SDR Forum • Solera Networks • Technopôle Defence & Security • TerreStar Networks • TUBITAK UEKAE • University of Maryland HyNet • Wakelight Technologies • Federal Aviation Administration • FOKUS • HAVELSAN • GBL Systems • Innovative Concepts, Inc. • Intelligent Integration • Institute for Defense Analysis • Interoperability Clearning House • International Data Links Society • Israel Aerospace Industries • LFV • LinQuest Corporation • Maritime Technology Centre R&D Institute • MBDA • Microsoft Corporation • Military Communication Institute • MilSOFT ICT • MIT Lincoln Laboratory 18

19. Members are Global Leaders: Academic institutions Aviation Service providers Defense suppliers All military services Multinational Government agencies Human service agencies Integrators Commercial systems Defense systems IT firms Communications Data management Human-Machine interface Information assurance Service providers Consulting Engineering Logistics Standards bodies • Increase interoperability within and among systems involved in Interagency and Multinational operations • Lower development costs and increase commonality of design in future systems – tailored standards and best practices • Improve application readiness through more rapid fielding of network centric systems – leverage technical “lessons learned” • Reduce systems cost and sustainability through re-use and commonality – facilitate ease of integration, upgrade, and support • Reduce Development Risk by identifying the common components needed for the network centric environment – Develop them where none exist • Improve Application Effectiveness through new, more focused development on domain specific capabilities NCOIC Goal: Facilitate Implementation of Network Centric Operations /Net Enabled Capability

20. NCOIC Tools & Processes Allow forEvaluation & Measurement Over the Lifecycle of systems “Although the applications domain is very diverse, integration problems across applications are similar. It’s interesting that we see a larger field of applications in NCOIC than we do, for instance, within the e-Government sector. If we can learn from the experience of developers in diverse sectors and apply it to the net-centric environment, that can open doors to new markets such as defense, homeland security and emergency response.” Linda Strick, Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems. “NCOIC’s delicate alchemy fosters true collaboration among global companies that are often fierce business competitors. Their efforts to resolve customers’ interoperability issues recently resulted in the publication of NCOIC’s Interoperability Framework, a set of guiding principles for developers of network-centric systems, products and services.” Nicholas Berthet, Thales Battlespace Transformation Centre.

21. Modeling and Simulation FT Dan Gregory (Thales) Marco Picollo (Finmeccanica) NIF Architecture Concepts FT Mark Bowler (Boeing) William Ison (Lockheed Martin) Building Blocks FT Network Centric Attributes FT Hans Polzer, (Lockheed Martin) Jack Zavin (US DoD) Technical Council/Team StructureAugust 26, 2010 Chair Ken Cureton (Boeing) Executive Sponsor: Dan Starcevich (Raytheon) TC Recommendation Committee Vice Chair: Jim Burke (Lockheed Martin) At-Large (membership) Sheryl Sizelove (Boeing) Chair Emeritus: Nicolas Berthet (Thales) Specialized Frameworks FT Martin Schmidt (EADS) IPTs Systems Engineering and Integration FTAl Nauda (Raytheon), John Reeves (Lockheed Martin) NEER IPT: Ian McGraw, (PlantCML, an EADS North American comp), Hal St Clair (EADS) C3 Interoperability IPT: Pascal Libert (EADS) Martin Hill (Thales) Aviation IPT : Anton Walsdorf (EADS), Mary Ellen Miller (Mosaic ATM, Inc) Maritime IPT : Aymeric Bonnaud (DCNS), Will Kramer Cyber Security IPT : Jessica Ascough (Harris), Chet Ratcliffe

22. Key Messages • NCOIC participation provides your business leaders direct personal contact with the key global leadersof your customer base in an information sharing environmen • NCOIC is analyzing mission threads and requirements to identify the standards and patterns required for mission execution. Members create opportunities to drive these standards and obtain early implementation insights. • NCOIC is engaging key government and civilian customers in identifying standards. Members interact with customers in a non-procurement setting, shaping requirements. • NCOIC is providing an architectural framework which allows COTS standards to be used in NCO. This influence will guide how standards will be used in future operations. Those who understand and help guide this framework will be better equipped to consult on NCO utilization. • NCOIC assessment & analysis tools -- NCAT™ and SCOPE -- allow customers to make accurate decisions on how to employ NCO capabilities.