80 likes | 222 Views
The Big Dig Project. Antonio Vazquez, Andrew Shinsako , Susanna Ruiz, Luis Zazueta , Miguel Vega, Markita Wright. Mean,Median,Mode for Radius,Humerus,Tibia, and Height. Radius, Humerus, Tibia, Height respectively Median 10.5 12 15 Mode 11 13 16.5 64 Mean 10.39 12.07 14.93 71.95.
E N D
The Big Dig Project Antonio Vazquez, Andrew Shinsako, Susanna Ruiz, Luis Zazueta, Miguel Vega, Markita Wright
Mean,Median,Mode for Radius,Humerus,Tibia, and Height Radius, Humerus, Tibia, Height respectively • Median 10.5 12 15 • Mode 11 13 16.5 64 • Mean 10.39 12.07 14.93 71.95
Stem Leaf Plot for Radius • Stem Leaf • 0 8.5 9 9 9 9 9.25 9.5 9.5 • 1 0 0 0 0 0 .5 .5 .5 .5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
Stem and Leaf Plot for Humerus • Stem Leaf • 0 9.5 9.5 • 1 0 .5 1 1 1 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2.5 2.5 2.5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4
Stem and Leaf Plot for Tibia • Stem Leaf • 1 2 2 2.5 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5.5 5.5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7.5 8
Summary of Project The Big Dig Project is a project that focuses on the size of individuals based on their following measurements, the radius, humerus, tibia, and gender. In our group there were a total of 4 males and 2 females. Our results compare and show the differences between the sizes of the people based on the size of their radius, humerus, tibia, and gender. We used formulas that were given to us by the teacher to find the average size based on the measurements that we gathered, they are the (radius, humerus, tibia, and gender.) We also found the mean median and mode for each person’s measurements.
Results • Our group found that our actual size was less than the average size. We also found that our size based on the tibia measurements were higher than our actual size. The height based on the measurements of the radius also resulted, that it was higher than our actual size. Our height based on the humerus was the closest in our actual size.