1 / 22

FY2012 teacher evaluation scales Revised 1/31/12

FY2012 teacher evaluation scales Revised 1/31/12. School District of Palm Beach County. CAO Meeting. Teacher Evaluation Scales. Instructional Practice (IP) Scale Student Learning Growth ( SLG ) Scale Final Rating Scale to combine IP and SLG. Teacher Evaluation Scales Developed by JTEC.

caine
Download Presentation

FY2012 teacher evaluation scales Revised 1/31/12

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FY2012teacher evaluation scalesRevised 1/31/12 School District of Palm Beach County CAO Meeting

  2. Teacher Evaluation Scales • Instructional Practice (IP) Scale • Student Learning Growth (SLG) Scale • Final Rating Scale to combine IP and SLG

  3. Teacher Evaluation Scales Developed by JTEC Instructional Practice (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory Final Rating HE Eff NI U Weighted Final Eval Scale Student Learning Growth (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory

  4. INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE Marzano - iObservation Instructional Practice (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory

  5. Instructional Practice Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1 Level0

  6. Instructional Practice Rating Scale

  7. Instructional Practice Rating Scale

  8. Instructional Practice Rating Scale

  9. Instructional Practice Rating Scale

  10. Instructional Practice Rating Scale

  11. Instructional Practice Rating Scale

  12. STUDENT LEARNING GROWTH Student Learning Growth (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory

  13. Student Learning Growth Teachers in Florida

  14. Highly Effective (13%) Teachers in Florida

  15. Effective (72%) Teachers in Florida

  16. Needs Development (13%) Teachers in Florida

  17. Unsatisfactory (2%) Teachers in Florida

  18. FINAL EVALUATION SCALE Combining Instructional Practice and Student Learning Growth • Weighted • Final Eval Scale

  19. FY2012 Final Evaluation Weights

  20. Final Evaluation RatingFCAT Classroom Teacher (60/40)

  21. Final Evaluation RatingFCAT Classroom Teacher (60/40)

  22. Teacher Evaluation Scales Developed by JTEC Instructional Practice (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory Final Rating HE Eff NI U Final Rating Scale Student Learning Growth (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory

More Related