180 likes | 258 Views
Effective Broadband Policy: International Benchmarks. Arabcom 2005 Tunisia, 30 th June 2005. Who We Are.
E N D
Effective Broadband Policy:International Benchmarks Arabcom 2005 Tunisia, 30th June 2005
Who We Are... • Global Insight provides the most comprehensive economic, financial and political coverage of countries, regions and industries available from any source and is recognized as the most consistently accurate forecasting company in the world. • Global Insight has over 3,800 clients in industry, finance and government with revenues in excess of $80 million, over 600 employees and 23 offices in 12 countries covering North and South America, Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. • Global Insight’s Telecoms Practice offers an online country intelligence service including daily market news analysis, quarterly market data, overviews of 80 markets and in-depth special reports. We also offer consulting services to the telecoms industry, including detailed subscriber forecasts and telecoms business risk analysis.
Outline • The importance of policy – reduce uncertainty • Policy levers and market growth – supply, demand and competition • Lesson from Abroad – South Korea and the UK • Effective Intervention – competition and demand • International Lessons Applied – Egypt case study
Global Broadband Markets Top Ten OECD Economies by Broadband Penetration DSL is currently estimated to account for around 60% of the global broadband market. • DSL • Cable Modem • Other OECD Rankings by penetration June 2004
The US Market – Suffering without policy? 2001 A lack of government intervention arguably means... • Greater demand uncertainty – slower private investment rates. • No guarantee that rural communities will be connected – greater pressure on regulators and USO funds. • Less end-user perception of the need for broadband. 2003 2004
Policy – Different objectives for different markets Access Connectivity Sweden ‘An information society for all’ South Korea‘Every household connected by 2005’ Japan ‘90% households connected by 2005’ Subscribers Competition Malaysia ‘10% penetration by 2008.’ Broadband Britain ‘the most competitive market (and extensive network) in the G7 by 2005’ Egypt ‘2% penetration by 2007’
South Korea – Direct aid and investment Demand • Rolled-out e-government • Migrated public services (health and education) to the internet • Invested in public access facilities • Training in industry and public sector Supply • ‘Soft’ loans/grants to investing operators • Tax breaks for rural and remote service provisioning • Made DSL port installation compulsory in all new MDUs • Invested in a nationwide fibre-optic backbone Broadband Subscribers per 100 Inhabitants YE 2001-June 2004
South Korea – Policy implications Investment Intensive • More than US$1.5bn invested to date in backbone network • Around US$1bn in soft loans for local infrastructure investors • Close to US$3bn allocated for investment in R&D between 1995 and 2007 Source: MIC
South Korea – Policy implications Despite soft loans, the leading alternative broadband ISP Hanaro has had to sell equity and re-finance debt... • At end-2003, Hanaro’s W2,220bn long-term debt was double its market capitalisation, and the firm was still making losses. • At end-2003, Hanaro management voted to sell 40% equity to Newbridge Capital and AIG as a means of gaining access to a US$600m loan facility. • Hanaro posted its first profit since its inception in 1999 at the end of 2004.
UK - From Investment to Competition Demand • e-government • e-public services • Tax breaks for content developers Supply • Tax breaks for SMEs and teleworkers Competition • LLUB - full and bit stream • Reductions in wholesale DSL tariffs Broadband Subscribers per 100 Inhabitants YE 2001-June 2004
UK Compared with South Korea • Retained focus on stimulating demand • Less investment intensive • More targeted fiscal approach • Left supply-side to competition • Implied lower debt burdens for private players ...but still delivering results! Broadband Penetration as % Households 24% 10.7% 5.6% 1.4% 2001 2002 2003 2004
Arab Broadband Progress DSL subscribers as % households Source: Global Insight, OECD, June 2004
International Lessons Applied - Egypt Demand • Free internet model – driving demand/increasing usage • Private-public PC initiative • e-government and e-public services Supply • Private ownership of internet backbones • Reductions of international bandwidth tariffs Competition • Introduced LLUB and capped collocation/unbundling tariffs • Accommodated alternative infrastructure ADSL Subscription Growth in Egypt Policy Introduced Policy Introduced
Egypt’s Policy Highlights Getting the balance right... • Clear policy target introduced early on – reduced uncertainty and encouraged private investment. • Usage data from Free Internet model allowed for reliable uptake estimates. • Targeted Support – PC initiative. • Low capex intensive – No direct infrastructure investment. • Competition put centre stage in the supply-side of the market – at the international/national bandwidth and local access level. ...other regional examples are Bahrain, Jordan and UAE
The Future of Broadband Policy Policy Essentials and Efficiencies • Clear transparent approach introduced early on – speeds investment rates by reducing uncertainty. • Intervene on the demand side – early adopter and aggregator. • Leave supply-side to competition - This is where regulators come in. • Keep direct aid and investment targeted – Egypt’s private-public PC initiative. • Pick market targets that meet market needs.
Thank you for listening Lucy Norton, Senior Analyst, Global Insight lucy.norton@globalinsight.com www.globalinsight.com