1 / 5

CBP Wrap-up

CBP Wrap-up. Chris Wilkerson, MRL/MTL Intel. THANKS !!!. Post-Mortem. 6 finalists instead of 5. Scores for all 6 finalists within ~10% of each other. The 6 th place finalist was 10% higher than the best performing non-finalist. Very high quality submissions.

calum
Download Presentation

CBP Wrap-up

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CBP Wrap-up Chris Wilkerson, MRL/MTL Intel

  2. THANKS!!!

  3. Post-Mortem • 6 finalists instead of 5. • Scores for all 6 finalists within ~10% of each other. • The 6th place finalist was 10% higher than the best performing non-finalist. • Very high quality submissions. • the average finalist was 45% better than gshare. • All submissions were run with both trace lists. Trace list selection did not effect finalist selection.

  4. Finalistsscores are in MPKI (mispredicts per 1000 insts)(corrected) • Hongliang Gao, Huiyang Zhou 2.574 • André Seznec 2.627 • Gabriel Loh 2.700 • Daniel A. Jiménez 2.742 • Pierre Michaud 2.777 • Veerle Desmet et al. 2.807

  5. Feedback • What can we do better… • What next… • Prefetching? • CBP2?

More Related