1 / 21

Peaks-over-threshold models

Peaks-over-threshold models. Szabolcs Erdélyi research assistant VITUKI Plc. Abstract. Used data POT model Choosing thresholds Results Summary. Used data. POT model. X 1 , X 2 , … independence, identically distributed random variables u high enough threshold

Download Presentation

Peaks-over-threshold models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Peaks-over-threshold models Szabolcs Erdélyi research assistant VITUKI Plc.

  2. Abstract • Used data • POT model • Choosing thresholds • Results • Summary

  3. Used data

  4. POT model X1 , X2 , … independence, identically distributed random variables u high enough threshold H(z) distribution function of GPD when y > 0, and

  5. POT model • Choosing threshold • Selecting data over threshold from daily maximum values • Declustering • Time of declustering (It’s necessary because of independence): 30-60 days • Calculate model parameters with maximum likelihood function • Representing results: return levels and confidence intervals with profile likelihood

  6. Choosing threshold Expected value of GPD, when threshold is u0: when < 1 (else infinity). Every u > u0: Expected value is linear, the shape parameter is constant function in u.

  7. 250 200 Átlagos meghaladás (cm) 150 100 y = -0.2844x + 289.2 50 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Küszöbérték (cm) Average exceed curve Szeged(H)

  8. 1000 900 /s) 3 800 700 Átlagos meghaladás (m 600 y = -0.1741x + 970.2 500 400 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3 Küszöbérték (m /s) Average exceed curve Szeged(Q)

  9. 300 250 200 Átlagos meghaladás (cm) 150 100 y = -0.247x + 219.4 50 0 300 400 700 800 0 100 200 500 600 Küszöbérték (cm) Average exceed curve Polgár(H)

  10. 800 700 /s) 3 600 Átlagos meghaladás (m 500 400 y = -0.2677x + 1237.4 300 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 3 Küszöbérték (m /s) Average exceed curve Polgár(Q)

  11. Shape parameter

  12. Shape parameter

  13. Záhony(H)

  14. Záhony(H)

  15. Záhony(Q)

  16. Záhony(Q)

  17. Polgár(H)

  18. Polgár(Q)

  19. Results, Vásárosnamény

  20. Other results

  21. Summary • On the majotity of data series the fitting is appropriate, the results are resonable • The final result is slighty affected by the selection of thresholds • In the cause of the data of Polgár(Q) and Szolnok(Q) the model does not fit properly • The reason for that can be found in the incidental errors of the calculation of data

More Related