1 / 32

HYDROGRAPHIC SOCIETY 4 DECEMBER 2007

HYDROGRAPHIC SOCIETY 4 DECEMBER 2007. NICK HARRINGTON, BSc, MRICS. WHY RENEWABLE ENERGY?. Reduction of emissions, Kyoto targets Security of supply Cost. MARINE ENERGY. Tidal Barrage Tidal Stream Wave Energy Shoreline Seabed Shallow water Deep water. WHY IN SOUTH WEST?.

camargo
Download Presentation

HYDROGRAPHIC SOCIETY 4 DECEMBER 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HYDROGRAPHIC SOCIETY4 DECEMBER 2007 NICK HARRINGTON, BSc, MRICS

  2. WHY RENEWABLE ENERGY? • Reduction of emissions, Kyoto targets • Security of supply • Cost

  3. MARINE ENERGY • Tidal Barrage • Tidal Stream • Wave Energy • Shoreline • Seabed • Shallow water • Deep water

  4. WHY IN SOUTH WEST? • Strong wave and tidal resource • Existing marine sector • Academic base • Opportunities in new industry

  5. WAVE POWER LEVELS Source: World Energy Council website - based on Claesson, (1987)

  6. TIDAL RESOURCE

  7. WAVE RESOURCE

  8. STRONG EXISTING GRID

  9. COSTS OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION Source: PB Power “Powering the Nation” March 2006

  10. R&D NaREC Demonstration Initial prototype EMEC Refined prototype Wave Hub Pre- commercial device Market entry with commercial product Market penetration WAVE HUB – UK ROUTE TO COMMERCIALISATION

  11. WAVE HUB PROVIDES • Consented sea area • Grid connected 5MW per berth • Monitoring and testing • Power purchase agreement • Opportunities to collaborate • Access to suppliers’ research base

  12. WESTWAVE - PELAMIS

  13. OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES - POWERBUOY

  14. OCEANLINX

  15. FRED OLSEN – FO3 BULDRA

  16. SITE IDENTIFICATION • Wave resource • Grid connection • Shipping • Wildlife • Fishing • Military • 12 NM limit

  17. SITE SELECTION Source: Halcrow Wave Hub Technical Feasibility Study – Jan 2005

  18. Fig 5.2 Anatec Navigational Risk Assessment (May 2006)

  19. PLANNING CONSENT • Electricity Act 1989 – Section 36 • declaration to extinguish rights of navigation • deemed consent for works on land • Food & Environment Protection Act 1985 – Section 5 • Coast Protection Act 1949 – Section 34 FURTHER APPLICATIONS • Safety zones • Device specific FEPA licences

  20. Terrestrial ecology Intertidal ecology Subtidal ecology Ornithology Marine ecology Fish and fisheries study Cetacean survey Water quality ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT • Sediment quality • Archaeological assessment • Landscape and visual amenity • Underwater video • Impact on surfing beaches • Stakeholder and community consultation

  21. SOUTH WEST WAVE HUB • Coastal Processes Study • Marine Traffic Survey • Navigation Risk Assessment

  22. CONSENT Consent granted 17 September 2007 • First Section 36 marine renewables consent in UK • Consent conditions

  23. LOCATION OF TSS RELATIVE TO THE WAVE HUB DEPLOYMENT AREA Fig 5.2 Anatec Navigational Risk Assessment (May 2006)

  24. OVERVIEW CHART OF TRACKS RECORDED 7 AUGUST 2005 (BUSIEST DAY) Fig 4.7 Anatec Marine Traffic Survey (August 2005)

  25. MAIN MERCHANT ROUTES IDENTIFED FROM SURVEY DATA Fig 5 Page 117 Anatec Navigational Risk Assessment (May 2006)

  26. FISHERIES • Liaison under FLOWW guidelines • Rights to fish removed by Secretary of State declaration • No statutory entitlement to compensation • Expectation developers to mitigate/compensate • Difficult to assess individual impacts

  27. PRI-MaRE Universities of Plymouth and Exeter • Plymouth Marine Laboratory • Marine Biological Association • Sir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science • The Met Office

  28. PRI-MaRE • Resource assessment • Coastal processes • Electrical operations • Operations and maintenance • Moorings design • Environmental impacts • Safety of operations • Social and economic

  29. PROGRAMME • Board approval April 2007 • Consents September 2007 • Financial close December 2007 • Order cable January 2008 • Construction Summer 2009 • First devices deployed Late summer 2009

  30. CAPTURING THE BENEFITS • Inward investment • Supply chain • Marine facilities • Support services • Research and knowledge economy • Overseas markets

  31. THE FUTURE • Marine Spatial Planning • Strategic Environmental Assessment • Track record of performance from devices • Environmental impacts understood • Applications for commercial projects

  32. FURTHER INFORMATION: www.wavehub.co.uk nick.harrington@southwestrda.org.uk

More Related