160 likes | 262 Views
OTT/drift analysis Level 2 Ocean Salinity. 24 October 2012. ARGANS & L2OS ESL. Retrieved salinity drift during 2012. SSS1 – same results with SSS2/3, same trend with ascending/descending, so not TEC or GN. Retrieved salinity anomaly.
E N D
OTT/drift analysisLevel 2 Ocean Salinity 24 October 2012 ARGANS & L2OS ESL
Retrieved salinity drift during 2012 SSS1 – same results with SSS2/3, same trend with ascending/descending, so not TEC or GN
Retrieved salinity anomaly Why large drifts in anomalies: OTT are referenced to climatology?
Retrieved salinity anomaly Anomalies not so bad in SSS anomalies for 2011 REPR, same period
OTT evolution REPR from month 1 to 23; OPER after month 24 Are OPER OTT good quality? Do they show same trends as 2011?
OTT evolution REPR from month 1 to 23; OPER after month 24 Are OPER OTT good quality? Do they show same trends as 2011?
OTT evolution 9 day time series products blur transitions due to OTT Monthly OTT
Are there any annual/long term drift trends in OTT? Ascending AFFOV median deltaTB Descending AFFOV median deltaTB
OTT drift trends? Ascending drift HH + 0.021 K/month VV ~0 K/month Descending drift HH + 0.013 K/month VV ~0 K/month Ascending AFFOV median deltaTB Descending AFFOV median deltaTB
OTT annual cycle? Descending cycle stronger then ascending – why? Individual OTT sometimes far from trends – why? Ascending AFFOV median deltaTB Descending AFFOV median deltaTB
Annual variations Descending orbits (Tx+Ty)/2 OTT mean LOCEAN (XB) analysis: positive correlation between OTTs and Sun declination. (No correlation with galactic noise, emission from flat sea or roughness) with Sun in FOV with Sun in FOV Physical temperature of antenna patches
Annual variations Ascending orbits (Tx+Ty)/2 OTT mean LOCEAN (XB) analysis: negative correlation between OTTs and Sun declination. (No correlation with galactic noise, emission from flat sea or roughness) with Sun in FOV with Sun in FOV Physical temperature of antenna patches
OTT/drift conclusions • All 3 L2OS ESLs have identified biases in SMOS Tbs very well correlated with Tp7 (at least on descending orbits; R=0.9!); why? (the reprocessing was expected to correct for Tp7, but it does not). • These biases cannot be explained by galactic noise, although we know that our galactic noise correction is probably imperfect. Justification: • in OTT computations, we exclude Tbs affected by large scattered GN (>4K); • when looking at the across track temporal evolution of the biases and of GN averaged along dwell lines, the temporal evolution of the Tb biases is the same whatever the location across track contrary to the GN variations for which the phase of the temporal evolution depends on the across track location; • the evolution of large GN and Tb biases seen by Joe are not well phased. (JB email 17/10/2012)
OTT/drift: the way forward? DPGS • Use a single MOTT for all orbits • made from all 2012 DPGS (or 2011 REPR) OTTs • either keep MOTT offset constant & see drift in retrieved salinity • or apply parametric best-fit polynomial drift to MOTT • Maintain running average OTT • either by regular execution of compareTBs on selected orbits (IDEAS) • or extend L2OS to write data for an OTT post-processor REPR • NIR centred OTT, parametric, or running average?