1 / 17

MONITORING PROGRESS REPORT 2006

Food and Agriculture (FA) Domain Committee. MONITORING PROGRESS REPORT 2006. 3rd DC meeting, Antalya (TR), 31 Jan – 2 Feb 2007. COST Action 871 Domain Food and Agriculture (FA). Cryopreservation of crop species in Europe. CSO approval date 27/06/2006 Entry into force 20/09/2006

cameron-glenn
Download Presentation

MONITORING PROGRESS REPORT 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Food and Agriculture (FA) Domain Committee MONITORING PROGRESS REPORT 2006 3rd DC meeting, Antalya (TR), 31 Jan – 2 Feb 2007

  2. COST Action 871 Domain Food and Agriculture (FA) Cryopreservation of crop species in Europe CSO approval date 27/06/2006 Entry into force 20/09/2006 End date 11/12/2010

  3. Action 871: Cryopreservation of crop species in Europe Participating Countries : 15 Chair :BE BG, CZ, DK, FI, FR, DE, IT, NL, PL, PT, CS, SK, ES, UK In the pipe-line: TR, RO, GR, LU Non-COST: Vavoliv, Russia Economic Dimension: 38 Million € Duration: 4 years

  4. Management Report data, part 2 • Chair of the Action:Dr. Bart Panis: Laboratory of Tropical Crop Improvement, K.U.Leuven,Kasteelpark Arenberg 13, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM • Vice chair of the Action:Professor Paul LYNCH Biological and Forensic Sciences department,,School of Science University of Derby, Kedleston Road DE22 1GB Derby, United Kingdom • Rapporteur:Dr. Charles Spillane: Genetics & Biotechnology Lab, Biochemistry DepartmentUniversity College Cork, Lee Maltings 2.1, Cork, Ireland • Science Officer: B. STOL • Administrative Officer: C. PEETERS • Action website: in preparation

  5. Management Report data, part 3 OBJECTIVES The main objective of this action is to improve and apply technologically advanced techniques for plant genetic resources conservation of crops that are grown/ and or conserved in Europe with main emphasis on long-term conservation through cryopreservation.

  6. Management Report data, part 3 Specific objectives of CRYOPLANET ? • Objective 1: To screen in detail the current utilization of plant cryopreservation in Europe. • Objective 2: To screen and compare the efficiency of existing plant cryopreservation protocols. • Objective 3: To improve fundamental knowledge about cryoprotection through the determination of physico-biochemical changes associated with tolerance towards cryopreservation. • Objective 4: To develop new plant cryopreservation protocols. • Objective 5: To assure the genetic stability and true-to-typeness of plants after cryopreservation. • Objective 6: To apply cryopreservation to European plant germplasm collections. • Objective 7: To proof the environmental, social and economic impact of plant cryopreservation.

  7. WG1 Fundamental aspects of cryopreservation/cryoprotection and genetic stability Optimisation Feed back WG2 Technology, application and validation of plant cryopreservation Management Report data, part 4

  8. Proteins Sugars Water thermal behavior Polyamines Membrane components Cytoskeletal protein Oxidative stress WG1: Fundamental aspects of cryopreservation/cryoprotection and genetic stability • 1.1. Fundamental aspect of cryopreservation and cryoprotection • Elucidation of the physico-biochemical background of cryoprotection and cryopreservation. Professor Pawel PUKACKI (chair WG1) Physiology of Abiotic Stress LabInstitute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of SciencesParkowa 5, 62-035 KornikPoland

  9. WG1: Fundamental aspects of cryopreservation/cryoprotection and genetic stability • 1.2. Genetic stability and authenticity • Assessment of the genetic integrity of plants to determine if they are ‘true to type’ after cryopreservation. Dr. M. Angeles REVILLA BAHILLO (co-chair WG1)Departamento Biología de Organismos y SistemasFaculty of Biologia, Universidad de OviedoCatedrático Rodrigo Uría s/n, 33071 OviedoSpain

  10. WG2: Technology, application and validation of plant cryopreservation • 2.1. Technology aspects of cryopreservation • Applications of different cryopreservation protocols to different plant species and tissues. Dr. Florent ENGELMANN (chair WG2)UR 141, IRDBP 64501, 911 avenue Agropolis34394 Montpellier cedex 05France

  11. WG2: Technology, application and validation of plant cryopreservation • 2.2. Impact and applications of cryopreservation in plants • genebanks, establishment of cryo-bank and dissemination of results Dr. Joachim KELLER (co-chair WG2) Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research IPKCorrensstraße 3, 466 GaterslebenGermany

  12. State of the art (Europe/rest world) • National Seed Storage Laboratory (NSSL) (Fort Collins, Colorado, USA): 2,100 accessions of apple (dormant buds) • National Clonal Germplasm Repository (NCGR) of Corvallis (USA): 104 accessions of pear (shoot tips); • International Potato Centre (CIP) (Lima, Peru) : 345 potato accessions • Tissue Culture BC Research Inc.(Vancouver, BC, Canada) : 5000 accessions representing 14 conifer species • AFOCEL (Association Forêt Cellulose) of France, with over 100 accessions of elm (dormant buds); • National Institute of Agrobiological Resources (NIAR) of Japan, with about 50 accessions of mulberry. • IRD (Montpellier, France) : 80 accessions of oil palm • IPK (Gatersleben, Germany)/ DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany) : 519 old potato varieties • INIBAP, Laboratory of Tropical Crop Improvement, K.U.Leuven (Heverlee, Belgium) : 500 banana accessions

  13. Why is cryopreservation not more widely applied? • the unavailability of efficient and robust cryopreservation protocols applicable to many plant species and diverse germplasm types • limited awareness of plant researchers unacquainted to recent developments in cryogenic storage methods • lack of coordinated research on plant cryopreservation. •  COST action like “CRYOPLANET” can make the difference

  14. Time table MC meeting: Management committee meeting; WG meeting: Working group meeting; STSMs: Short-term scientific missions; Workshop*: Timing of the Inter-COST Workshops will be defined in agreement with the Management committee of that specific Action.

  15. Meetings planned 1/ WG1 meeting April 13-14 Oviedo (Spain) Organiser Dr. M. Angeles REVILLA BAHILLO 2/ WG2 meeting combined with meeting of executive committee May 11-12 Firenze (Italy) Organiser Dr. Lambardi MAURIZIO 3/ Management Committee meeting In combination with the Society for Low Temperature Biology Annual Scientific meeting at the University of Derby (12-14th Sept 2007) hosted by Professor Paul LYNCH 4/ Training Workshop on DSC and thermal analysis (8 researchers) End 2007 Organiser Dr. Milos FALTUS (Prague, Czech Republic)

  16. Dissemination plans • Articles in refereed scientific journals • Common reviews, books • A public website (information about the project, the achievements, services/consultancies offered and announcements of training workshops. • Information on the official webpages of the collaborating institutions. • The consortium will organize workshops for scientists, germplasm curators regulatory bodies and policy makers • At the end of the Action, the consortium will offer its expertise as a service to the EU. • Presentations at International Conferences, for promoting the European know-how and increasing the international collaboration. • Teaching activities in Universities at undergraduate and post-graduate level. Young scientists and engineers will thus be trained and informed on the latest developments in cryopreservation. Significant need to develop dissemination plan. This will be a major agenda item at Executive Committee Meeting in May (Firenze). Members of COST 871 need to feedback ideas to the Executive Committee by end of April 2007

  17. Conclusions • Everything is in place

More Related