1 / 7

Sector targeting and lobbying

Sector targeting and lobbying. Message : Social gains of export subsidies (Strategic Trade Policy) may be lost if the firms lobby for increased subsidies (“rent- seeking”) Lobbying costs reduce social welfare. The two extremes of lobbyism. Negotiations by firms aiming at free trade

candra
Download Presentation

Sector targeting and lobbying

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sector targeting and lobbying Message: Social gains of export subsidies (Strategic Trade Policy) may be lost if the firms lobby for increased subsidies (“rent- seeking”) Lobbying costs reduce social welfare

  2. The two extremes of lobbyism • Negotiations by firms aiming at free trade • Negotiations by firms that try to achieve protection and/or subsidies • All forms of lobbyism harmful?

  3. The model • (I)S=s+∂(L) • s: initial subsidy S: final subsidy L: input in lobbyism • (II)U=π-(s+∂(L))x • U: the government's welfare function π: profit "Domestic" x: production "Domestic" • π=p(x+y)x-c(x)+(s+∂(L))x-wL • p: price y:production "Foreign" c: variable costs • w: lobbying costs

  4. RESULT • "Smart" and "naive" government respectivel • "Smart" government - "Domestic”  • Πx=pxx+p-cx+(s+∂(L))≤0  • ΠL=∂Lx-w≤0  • ΠL=0→lobbyism • "Smart" government - "Foreign”  • Πy=pyy+p-cy=0 • The Government  • MaxU=π(x*,y*,L*,s,w)-(s+∂(L*))x* • x*,y*,L* : firm optimum  • Us=x*pxys*-(s+∂(L*))xs*-wLs*

  5. Maybe social gains of the subsidy will vanish? • Us(S=0)=x*pxys*-(∂(L*)xs*+wLs*) • Xs*>0, Ls*>0¹⁾, ys*<0, px<0 • If x*pxys*< (∂(L*)xs*+wLs*) then a subsidy will lead to reduction in welfare • 1) A mistake in (11): Ls*=∂Lπyy*/∇>0

  6. Assume that the subsidy has a positive effect on the welfare • (III) s*=sB/S - w(Ls*/(xx*)-∂(L*) • where sB/S refers to the optimal subsidy in Strategic Trade Theory • (III) is inserted into (I)  • S*= sB/S - w(Ls*/(xx*) • (II) is written as   • U=π - S*x*  • /figure 1/ • "Naive government" - see figure 1

  7. Questions for discussion: • How shall governments deal with imitation when they formulate IP? • Can Governments (the EU) increase social welfare by involving private companies in STP and IIP? • Will the situation change if intermediaries such as Associations or Confederations of industries negotiate on behalf of the companies? • 3) What can be done to improve the legitimacy of lobbyisme?

More Related