1 / 22

Identifying quality standards for genetic reserve conservation of CWR

Identifying quality standards for genetic reserve conservation of CWR. J.M. Iriondo 1 , N. Maxted 2 , S. Kell 2 , B. Ford-Lloyd 2 & C. Lara 1 1 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain 2 University of Birmingham, UK .

caraf
Download Presentation

Identifying quality standards for genetic reserve conservation of CWR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Identifyingqualitystandardsforgenetic reserve conservation of CWR J.M. Iriondo1, N. Maxted2, S. Kell2, B. Ford-Lloyd2 & C. Lara1 1Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain 2University of Birmingham, UK Towards the establishment of genetic reserves for crop wild relatives and landraces in Europe 13–15 September 2010, University of Maderia, Funchal, Portugal

  2. Introduction • AEGRO project “An Integrated European In Situ Management Work Plan: Implementing Genetic Reserves and On Farm Concepts” • focuses on the development of in situ conservation strategies for CWR.

  3. Introduction • Strategies for the in situ conservation of CWR involve the establishment of genetic reserves within protected areas • greater sustainability and efficacy • One of the deliverables of the AEGRO project is the formulation of quality standards for genetic reserve conservation of CWR.

  4. Rationale • Adoption of standards of good practices relies on the hypothesis that programmes that are executed this way achieve more rigor in the process of decision-making, and more efficiency in the use of resources and in pursuing the objective of conservation (O’Neill, 2007; CMP, 2004).

  5. Objectives

  6. Generationprocess

  7. Structure

  8. Structure

  9. Quality standards: protected areas

  10. Quality standards: protected areas

  11. Qualitystandards: genetic reserves

  12. Qualitystandards: genetic reserves

  13. Qualitystandards: genetic reserves

  14. Qualitystandards: genetic reserves

  15. Qualitystandards: genetic reserves

  16. Qualitystandards: genetic reserves

  17. Qualitystandards: use • Bottom-up: Managers interested in conserving priority CWRs in their PA. • Top-down: Last stage of the process of selecting locations for a network of genetic reserves when multiple alternatives exist according to primary selection criteria

  18. Qualitystandards • Present standards developed from the perspective of the manager of a protected area • Additional requirements from implementation of national or global approaches to the in situ conservation of CWR may be needed (Maxted and Kell, 2009)

  19. https://sites.google.com/site/qualitystandardsforcwrs/home

  20. http://groups.google.com/group/quality-standards-CWRquality-standards-CWR@googlegroups.comhttp://groups.google.com/group/quality-standards-CWRquality-standards-CWR@googlegroups.com

  21. Thankyouforyourattention!

More Related