360 likes | 525 Views
Competitive Interaction. Competitive Outcomes. Hardball?. Organizational Characteristics. Industry Characteristics. Dethronement of the Leader. Wal-Mart. Market Share. Sears. JC Penney. 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000.
E N D
Competitive Outcomes Hardball? Organizational Characteristics Industry Characteristics
Dethronement of the Leader Wal-Mart Market Share Sears JC Penney 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Dethronement of the Leader Market Share Boeing McDonnell- Douglass Airbus 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Dethronement of the Leader Market Share (U.S.) Nike Reebok Adidas 1980 1990 2005
King of the Hill – Fizzy Beverages Market Share Other ? Coke Pepsi 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Simple Rivalry: Prisoner’s DilemmaWhat to say to police? Criminal 2 Confess Keep Quiet #2 Serves 10 Years in jail #1 Goes Free Both Serve 5 Years in Jail Confess Criminal 1 #1 Serves 10 Years in Jail #2 Goes Free Both Serve 1 Year in Jail Keep Quiet
Three Stooges Larry, Moe, and Curley are in a 3-way duel and agree to take turns shooting each other, in that order Accuracy statistics: • Larry hits target 20% of the time • Moe hits target 80% of the time • Curley hits target 100% of the time When the duel starts, what should Larry do?
Competitive Intelligence A systematic and ethical program for gathering information about competitors and general business trends to further your own company’s goals
Play the Game Differently New market opportunity New customers Develop/leverage new value chain strengths New strategies/tactics New “flow” of the game Why CI? • Playing the Game Better • Focus on existing competitors/strategic position • Leverage value chain strengths • Incrementally improve existing strategies/tactics • Figuring out what drives behavior • Environment/industry drivers • Organizational drivers • Managerial drivers
Competitor Intelligence Pyramid Recommendations Analysis of Data Sources of Data
Industry experts/analysts Industry publications Trade shows/conferences Advertisements/PR University research centers Financial Court documents/patents Suppliers/customers Newspapers Help wanted ads Reverse engineering labs Competitor Intelligence Pyramid
Your Rival’s News-based Competitive Actions July-October 2009 • Contract with Spike Lee for TV ad • Increase R&D budget by 30% • Buy warehouse facility near airport in Germany, Re-tool with robotic material handling system • License Oracle’s newest technology • Cut prices on older version of product by 33% • Endorsement contract with famous World Cup soccer athletes • Create multifunctional new product design team
Value chain analysis Ratio analysis Benchmarking Cost analysis Trend analysis Personality profiling Wargaming or scenario planning Competitive behavior analysis Competitor Intelligence Pyramid
Track Existing Rivals Anticipate New Rivals Inform Strategy: Identify own/competitor’s strengths/weaknesses Early warning system Plan of attack/retaliation Competitor Intelligence Pyramid
Competitive Action Repertoire The set of competitive actions carried out in a given time period Coke’s Market Share MKT CAP SIG PROD PRICE MKT MKT PROD Repertoire
Your Rival’s Competitive Actions • Contract with famous movie director, Spike Lee, for TV ad • Increase R&D budget by 30% • Buy warehouse facility near airport in Germany, Re-tool with robotic material handling system • License Oracle’s newest technology • Cut prices on older version of product by 33% • Endorsement contract with famous U.S. Olympic athletes • Create multifunctional new product design team a b c d e
Competitive Dynamics Analysis • Observe competitive moves • Organize competitive moves • Action/response pairs • Action repertoires (year-end tallies) • Competitive attacks/sequences • Measurement/Analysis of Characteristics • Action pattern characteristics that improve: • Market share • Stock price • Profitability
Response Action Action-Reaction “Pairs” Action Pair 1 Action Pair 2 Action Pair 3 Action Pair 4 Coca-Cola d d c d Pepsi a c a e • Profits • Growth • Mkt. Share time
Profits Growth Mkt. Share Total Actions Complexity Action “Repertoires” c c c Coca-Cola a a Year-End Tallies a c Pepsi d e time
Strategy and Adaptive Maneuvering 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 • Chess: • Epaulette’s Mate • Sicilian Defense a b c d e f g h
Sequence Applications... COMPUTER PROGRAM: data actions2; subj = _n_; do i = 1 to max; output = matrix; end; run; DNA: BOXING: Jab...Jab…Uppercut LANGUAGE: qcheaTiueissesne. hsiT si a cesneueq. This is a sequence. CAGTACATAGTACGATACGA MUSIC:
Competitive Actions Over Time Coke Pepsi a a a b b b c c c d d e e d c e a a b a b c d e c b Observed Sequence Observed Sequence
Coke Strategic Non-Conformity Coke Industry Norm a a a b b b c c c d d e e d c e a a b a b c d e c b Observed Sequence Observed Sequence
Pepsi Strategic Conformity Pepsi Industry Norm a a a b b b c c c d d e e e a b d e c a a b c d c b Observed Sequence Observed Sequence
Coke Strategic Unpredictability Coke in time1 Coke in time2 a a a b b b c c c d d e e a d a b c e d b b c c e a Observed Sequence Observed Sequence
Pepsi Strategic Predictability Pepsi in time1 Pepsi in time2 a a a b b b c c c d d e e a d a b c e a d b c c e b Observed Sequence Observed Sequence
King of the Hill – Fizzy Beverages Market Share Other ? Coke Pepsi 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
“Hardball” Competition • Total Actions • More actions are better • Average Response Time • Faster response time is better • Repertoire Complexity • Complex repertoire is better • Attack [Un-]Predictability • Unpredictability is better
Group Exercise: Coke vs. Pepsi • Total Actions • Count of total actions • Average Response Time • Avg. number of time units between last competitive move in Coke’s attack and Pepsi’s first competitive response, etc. • Repertoire Complexity • Extent to which entire pattern/repertoire is skewed/simple vs. balanced/complex • Attack [Un-]Predictability • Recognizable repetition or action combinations in the sequence of actions?
Scoring the Fight Total Actions Faster Responses More Complex Repertoire Unpredictable Attacks CokePepsi Who will win?
Rivals’ prior behavior Patterns Tendencies Type & order of moves Proactiveness Reactiveness Drivers of Behavior Management orientation Decision-making Financial constraints Industry characteristics Implications for CI:Predict Future Behavior of Rivals
Implications for CI:Monitor Your Own Behavior • Objectively measures of competitive behavior • Safeguard against complacency, predictability, simplicity of your own company • Keep rivals off balance / disruption / guessing • What combinations of moves are effective? …which are ineffective? …smoke signals or bluffs?