1 / 26

Physics Week May – DPG-PH JetMET Robert Schoefbeck (Hephy Vienna) May, 17th

Physics Week May – DPG-PH JetMET Robert Schoefbeck (Hephy Vienna) May, 17th. Four topics in one talk. MET-bisector studies (Jared Sturdy) Decompose MET along the jet-bisector axis in di -jet events Disentangle cont. to res. from Calo -response/noise and un/clustered energy

cardea
Download Presentation

Physics Week May – DPG-PH JetMET Robert Schoefbeck (Hephy Vienna) May, 17th

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Physics Week May – DPG-PH JetMETRobert Schoefbeck (Hephy Vienna)May, 17th

  2. Four topics in one talk • MET-bisector studies (Jared Sturdy) • Decompose MET along the jet-bisector axis in di-jet events • Disentangle cont. to res. from Calo-response/noise and un/clustered energy • MET in Multi-Jet Events (>2) This is not a QCD study! • low statistics; still ~ factor 1000 away from 1pb-1 • Sarah’s suggestion: Suppose that MET-mismeasurement depends on Sum-ET: • consider bins in Sum-Et, Overlay MET-shapes with 2,3,4 Jets. If true, shapes will vary with the Sum-Et bin but less/little/not with n-Jets • The point: “How (well) does MET behave in >2-Jet events” • works nicely for the data I ran over (May 5th) • 3. B-Tag / MET in heavy flavour events This should not be a B-Tagging study! • In a Diject selection, cut on e.g. SSV-BTag(Impactparameter significance) • needs more statistics, will be good for 1pb-1 • enrich sample and check with MC; don’t try to commission B-Tagger • sync WP with B-Taggers • The point: Understand Neutrino-contribution; Don’t expect big effect for SSV! • 4. Pile-Up • We had ~0.2% PU before April 24th • Pile-up is best studied in early low-PU runs where the non-PU sample is pure • PU has/will increase a lot

  3. Technicalities CMSSW_3_6_0 on top of 3_5_7 rereco Monte Carlo: /MinBias/Spring10-START3X_V26A_357ReReco-v3/GEN-SIM-RECO MC with pile-Up: /MinBias/Spring10-START3X_V25B_156BxLumiPileUp-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO Data: /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-Apr20Skim_GOODCOLL-v1/RAW-RECOofficially certified runs as of May 5th • Event selections :   – BSC Technical Trigger (TT) bits 40 OR 41 (At least one hit on each BSC side)   – Veto BSC BeamHalo TT bits 36, 37, 38, 39 (BSC hit timing)   – BPTX TT bit 0 (2 beam coincidence)   – Physics Declared bit set (tracker and pixel HV ON)

  4. Technicalities con’t. • “Scraping events” removal:   – Require the fraction of “high-purity” tracks in events with more than 10 tracks is greater than 25%• Primary Vertex Selection   – Require that: vertex is NOT fake, NDF>4, |Z|<=15cm, d0<2cm• ECAL spike cleaning in DATA, HCAL spike cleaning wrt. to recipy (V1) for JES: threshold at 20GeV, for both typeI-Met and L2L3 - Jets according to new Spring10 JEC in CMSSW_3_6_0 An event is removed if any Jet does not pass loose Jet-ID (pT-L2L3>20, EMF>.01 if abs(eta)<2.6, fHPD>.98, n90Hits>1) DiJet-selection, used througout: pT-L2L3>20 abs(eta)<3 abs(abs(delta-phi)-Pi)<1.0

  5. 2. MET in >2-Jet Events (1/4) Understand what we can expect in multi-jet events (upper left) w/o doing QCD-study. Jet multiplicities for >2 hard jets are modelled quite well in Pythia (upper right). too little statistics for Sum-ET-discrepancy in DiJet Events (lower right) but probably it’s there.

  6. 2. calo-MET in >2-Jet Events: MET-shapes in Sum-ET-bins (2/4) Bin in sum-ET; look at calo-MET-shapes with a definite number of Jets (>=2). Point: See, if MET-mismeasurement is driven by Sum-ET or by how Sum-ET splits among the jets. MET-shapes in Sum-ET-Bins inclusive (blue) and with a fixed number of jets Expect Sum-ET-dependence of (inclusive) MET-shapes, but don’t expect a dep. on n-jet

  7. 2. MET in >2-Jet Events (3/4) Met-shapes in Sum-Et bins Same, normalized MET-shapes dependend on Sum-ET

  8. Normalized Met-Shapes in Bins of Sum-ET for different n-Jet (4/4) Preliminary result for 2- and 3-Jet Bin is promising. MET depends on SUM-ET, but not on how SUM-ET is distributed among jets.

  9. 3. MET in pile-Up (1/3) we have ~ 0.2% PU, consistent with ~100Hz and 50% efficiency. PU-MC agrees quite well; MET and, even more so, sum-ET are higher in PU-events.

  10. 3. Normalized Distributions (z-Seperation 1cm) (2/3) Data/Data comparison for events with 1 and 2 Vertices; Normalized; In PU: Higher jet-multiplicites (upper right), higher Sum-ET (lower right),higher MET (column 1&2) Very small dependence on z-Separation parameter (here: 1cm, default = 10cm ). See Backup. We will have to move to tighter z-Sep. and maybe start to subtract PU when it increases.

  11. 3. Understand MET in PU: Re-weight PU-MET w.r.t. Sum-ET (3/3) The point here is: Can the larger MET be attributed to sum-ET or nJet? MET in non-PU (blue) ~~ MET in PU, re-weighted , such that the Sum-ET shape agrees with the non-PU-shape. Good Agreement! No additional source of MET in PU. Source of MET in PU seems to be understood. Re-binning wrt. n-jets clearly isn’t appropriate.

  12. 4. MET and Heavy Flavour / MC Flavour 8.6+/-016 7.36+/-0.91 8.78+/-0.04 9.71+/-0.36 13.85+/-0.25 13.53+/-1.47 14.22+/-0.05 16.00+/-0.53 don’t expect big contribution from non-lepton B-taggers Need to move on from MinimumBias –MC (in the making)

  13. BACKUP (Flip through the slides for visual effect of z-Separation!!)

  14. z-Seperation 1cm

  15. z-Seperation 5mm

  16. z-Seperation 2mm

  17. z-Seperation 1mm

  18. z-Seperation 1cm

  19. z-Seperation 5mm

  20. z-Seperation 2mm

  21. z-Seperation 1mm

  22. z-Seperation 1cm

  23. z-Seperation 5mm

  24. z-Seperation 2mm

  25. z-Seperation 1mm

  26. 1. type-I corrections to MET in Inclusive and Di-Jet selections

More Related