1 / 13

Data Reduction and Enhancement of Global Composites for Spot-Vegetation (VGT)

This paper discusses the data reduction and enhancement techniques used for global composites of SPOT-Vegetation (VGT) data. The study focuses on the extraction of phenological variables and the analysis of longitudinal time series data.

carillo
Download Presentation

Data Reduction and Enhancement of Global Composites for Spot-Vegetation (VGT)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DATA REDUCTION and ENHANCEMENT of GLOBAL COMPOSITES of SPOT-VEGETATION (VGT) • Herman Eerens, Else Swinnen, Yves Verheijen • Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (Vito - Belgium) • Frank Canters • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB - Belgium) • Acknowledgements: • Belgian Science Policy Office (Funding) • JRC-SAI (Full year cycle of global VGT-S10)

  2. Dec Jan 0.75 0.75 Amazonas Nov Feb 0.50 Oct 0.25 Mar Nile Delta NOAA-AVHRR: 365 x S1 SPOT-VEGETATION: 36 x S10 Sep Apr Sahara Aug May Sahel July June MVC-Composites: - still affected by clouds, bidirectional effects, measurement errors - best visible / removable in longitudinal analysis(time series) - cleaning procedures: MVC-month, BISE, Verhoef,...

  3. Monthly Mean NDVI t1 t2 t3 0.8 Max = 0.7 NDVI2 = Min + 0.8(Max – Min) = 0.6 NDVI1 = Min + 0.2(Max – Min) = 0.3 Min = 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 39 12 36 9 24 27 33 3 6 15 18 21 0 30 Decades 0 Extraction of Phenological Variables: - Simple: Annual mean / min / max / amplitude of NDVI - Complex: start / end / length of green season(s) - Often better inputs for classification - Only feasible through longitudinal analysis(time series)

  4. Mean Annual NDVI Seasonality Index SI SI = [Range - Mean]/ [Range + Mean] Phenological Variables: Examples from the “Global Land 1km AVHRR Data Set” April 1992 - March 1993, Interrupted Goode Homolosine

  5. None (desert/ice) Intermediate Length of Green Season Entire year January June December Start of Green Season No Growing Season Phenological Variables: Examples from the “Global Land 1km AVHRR Data Set” April 1992 - March 1993, Interrupted Goode Homolosine

  6. <0.25 <0.25 <0.5 <0.5 >0.5 >0.5 range range <0.1 <0.1 mean mean < 0.17 < 0.17 < 0.35 < 0.35 < 0.45 < 0.45 < 0.55 < 0.55 > 0.55 > 0.55 Phenological Variables: Examples from the “Global Land 1km AVHRR Data Set” April 1992 - March 1993, Interrupted Goode Homolosine Simple Biome Classification Bivariate Level Slice: - Annual Mean NDVI - Annual NDVI Range

  7. LONGITUDINAL TIME SERIES ANALYSIS REQUIRED • It adds a new dimension to the results of the transversal analysis (per decade / day) • At a given moment, áll information of a full year (36 x S10, 360 x S1) must be available simultaneously Band BPP CONTENTS VGT-SYNTHESIS ------- ------ ----------------- 1 2 BLUE Reflectance 2 2 RED Reflectance 3 2 NIR Reflectance 4 2 SWIR Reflectance 5 1 NDVI 6 1 Zenith angle of sun 7 1 Zenith angle of sensor 8 1 Azimuth angle of sun 9 1 Azimuth angle of sensor 10 1 Status map: errors in 4 bands, land, cloud, snow/ice 11 2 Time grid: minutes between pixel registration and start of synthesis (LOG-file) Total 16 GLOBAL VGT-SYNTHESIS  600 Mb pixels x 16 byte/pix  10 000 Mb  10 Gb FULL YEAR CYCLE S10: 360 Gb S1: 3.6 Tb • TOO MUCH DATA  CLASSICAL SOLUTIONS: • Temporal selection: select limited number of composites • Spectral selection: only NDVI, … • Spatial selection: - Extract/analyse specific study areas • - Work on degraded images

  8. DEDICATED SCHEME FOR DATA REDUCTION 1. Radiometric Compression: 16  6 bytes (37.5%) - Eliminate BLUE and NIR - Rescale reflectances from 16 to 8 bit (0-250) RED/SWIR: R = 0%…62.5% in steps of 0.25% NIR: R = 0%…83.3% in steps of 0.33% - Values 251-255: special flags (saturation, error, ...) - Status_out : Cloud + Snow/ice + Day_in_decade - Combine 2 zenith angles in 1 byte (steps of 5°) - Combine 2 azimuths in 1 byte (relative azimuth:0-180°)  Output = 6 Byte-layers 2. Eliminate all the Water Pixels (25%) - 134,134,736 land pixels left  Spatial context lost! - Results stored in Pseudo-Images (PI)  IDL/ENVI-images (Ncol=5000, Nrec=26827) - All spectral (per-pixel) operations still feasible (via IDL/ENVI): time series analysis, classification (!), ... 3. Improved Land/Sea-Mask - VGT-mask: 5-10 sea pixels along coast (too much) - Boreal regions in winter: confused with sea (status map) 4. Conversion to Equal-Area Projection (IGH): - In: Plane carré of VGT (worst projection) at (1/112°)² - Out: Interrupted Goode Homolosine (IGH) at 1x1km²  REDUCTION: ± 10% without LOSS of DATA !  FULL YEAR CYCLE: S10: 36 Gb S1: 360Gb

  9. NORMAL IMAGES - Normal format - Land and water PSEUDO-IMAGES - Only land - All in IGH-Projection - Sorted by Region-ID IGH-Y LAT 111122223334444455555566 Country-ID Raster 1 3 PI_ID PI_X PI_Y PI_LON PI_LAT 5 STEP 1a Extract 1 3 5 2 4 6 STEP 1b Inverse IGH-projection 2 4 6 IGH-X LON 0=sea Scan per Pixel SPOT4-VGT Decadal Synthesis - 11 HDF image layers - 16 bytes/pixel - LOG-File (geo-referencing) Pixel Lon/Lat Convert STEP 2 Transversal Reduction Col/Rec in HDF Read HDF's 1 3 11 Input-Values 5 Filter 2 4 6 Output-Values 6 Output PI_RED PI_NIR PI_SWIR PI_THETA PI_AZIM PI_MASK Output Pseudo-Images - 6 per decadal synthesis - 6 bytes/pixel - Repeat for 36 syntheses/year  36 x 6 = 216 pseudo-images STEP 3 Longitudinal Analysis • - Normal Image Format • - IGH-Projection • - Limited number of final Images • - Limited disk space - All in PI-format - Time series analysis - Elimination of clouds - Extraction of phenological variables STEP 4 Reconversion

  10. Normal Images Pseudo-Images A B 1 2 3 4 C Example of IDL/ENVI-FORMATTED PSEUDO-IMAGES NORMAL IMAGES A Land-See Mask (Inter. Goode Homolosine, 1x1km²) B GTOPO30-DEM (Geographic Lon/Lat) C VGT-S10, Dec.3 of May 1998, NIR (Geogr. Lon/Lat) PSEUDO-IMAGES (only 134 135 000 land pixels) 1 Longitude of pixel centre (float) 2 Latitude of pixel centre (float) 3 Altitude (from B - Short Integer) 4 NIR of Dec.3 of May 1998 (from C - rescaled to Byte)

  11. Example of IDL/ENVI-FORMATTED PSEUDO-IMAGES 1. PI_XY IN: Land/Sea mask in Master System (IGH) OUT: 2 master-PI’s with IGH-X/Y of pixel centres 2. PI_IGH IN: 2 master-PI’s with IGH-X/Y of pixel centres OUT: 2 master-PI’s with Lon/Lat of pixel centres 3. PI_EXTR IN: Any image in IGH or Lon/Lat (+ master-PI’s) OUT: PI-version of that image (Byte / Short Int / Float) 4. PI_VGT IN: VGT-S10/S1 + master-PI’s OUT: 6 Byte PI-images 5. PI_BACK IN: Any previously created PI (+ master-PI’s) OUT: Corresponding normal image in IGH Option: selection of output window 6. PI_REDU IN: Set of all VGT-PI’s (+ master-PI’s) OUT: Corresponding set of normal images, IGH, degraded resolution (33x33km²), systematic selection 7. CLEAN IN: Set of 36 VGT-S10 images (normal or PI) OUT: Cleaned NDVI-profiles 8. PHENO IN: Set of 36 VGT-S10 images (normal or PI) OUT: Cleaned NDVI-profiles

  12. SET of DEGRADED IMAGES RED NIR SWIR End of June 1988 NORMAL IMAGES - 36 decades x 6 = 216 images - Global but degraded (33km x 33km) - Npix = 1213x423 = 513 099  Total: 216 x 0.5 = 110 Mb - Systematic pixel selection  original signatures - Excellent data set to test performance of new procedures on global scale

  13. CONCLUSIONS 1. One Possible Pathway for Global Classification - Transverse reduction of all VGT-images  PI’s - Also extract external information: DEM, …  additional classification variable Regions  for post-processing (LC-statistics) Existing classifications  Training / Validation - Longitudinal analysis on PI-images: Cleaning, elimination of bidirectional effects, addition of phenological variables, improved VI’s,… - Classification in PI-form - Reconversion to normal image 2. Preliminary data enhancement via data reduction seems indispensible 3. To be integrated in CTIV (?)  Optional delivery of data in PI-form (better than ZIP)  More users get access to global data 4. Lots of improvements possible: other geo-systems, other output formats (now only ENVI + IDRISI), streamlining of software,… 5. High radiometric resolution redundant

More Related