240 likes | 381 Views
Bachelor of Fine Arts. Bachelor of Fine Arts Program Code 111. Report on Academic Year 2009-2010. 2009-10 Priority Outcomes. Student-Learning Outcomes: List of All Program Student-Learning Outcomes. Institutional Mission Provide quality educational opportunities
E N D
Bachelor of Fine Arts Bachelor of Fine Arts Program Code 111 Report on Academic Year 2009-2010
2009-10 Priority Outcomes Student-Learning Outcomes: List of All Program Student-Learning Outcomes
Institutional Mission • Provide quality educational opportunities • Prepare students for professional success • Act as a driving force in the cultural life of the region • School and Departmental Mission • Prepare students for entry into graduate school or a number of art-related professions or personal endeavors by providing learning opportunities that lead to the completion of a specialized curriculum in one of several studio disciplines • Strategic Plan 2013 • Core Values • The Department values student learning as a top priority • The Department focuses resources to achieve optimal student learning • The Department provides cultural and social development • Goals • The Department maintains and enhances Cameron’s commitment to providing programs of the highest quality in instruction, research, and service to better meet the needs of the citizens of the region. (Plan 2013 Goal I.1.1) • The Department ensures effective assessment of student learning, including experiential learning. (Plan 2013 Goal I.1.3) • The Department provides opportunities for students to demonstrate their scholarship in regional and national forums. (Plan 2013 Goal I.1.6) • The Department makes effective use of existing and new facilities. (Plan 2013 Goal III.3.1) • The Department expands the number of educational, cultural, and social opportunities for the region.(Plan 2013 Goal III.3.6) • The Department increases Cameron University Alumni Association membership by expanding visibility through off-campus events, developing services, and creating opportunities that engage alumni. (Plan 2013 Goal IV.4.4) • The Department develops partnerships with area businesses and industries, including encouraging use of conferencing facilities and matching educational offerings to employer needs. (Plan 2013 Goal IV.4.9) Student-Learning Outcomes: Alignment of Student-Learning Outcomes
Student-Learning Outcomes: Measures of Student-Learning Outcomes
Program methodologies that address shortfalls in student learning prior to graduation • BFA entrance exam and review serves as a mid-level assessment • Studio course critiques provide direct feedback for improvement • Curriculum structure and faculty interaction Student-Learning Outcomes: Program Methodologies That Address Shortfalls in Learning
2008-09 Priority Outcome 1 Student-learning outcome • BFA students will demonstrate the ability to write and think critically within the discipline Evidence that action is being implemented • Action item: Focus the essay topic on aesthetics • Selected philosophy-based topic • Action item: Create a higher-order thinking skills rubric to reflect the essay topic • Developed a higher-order thinking skills rubric to score the essay Program Actions Since Last Assessment Presentation: Evidence That Action Is Being Implemented
2008-09 Priority Outcome 2 Student-learning outcome • BFA students will demonstrate the critical thinking strategy, generating or assessing solutions • to a concept and the reasoning for determining the best solution for the intended communication Evidence that actions are being implemented • Action item: Develop a rubric to evaluate specific components of the objective • Developed a rubric to score the objective during class critiques Program Actions Since Last Assessment Presentation: Evidence That Action Is Being Implemented
2008-09 Priority Outcome 3 Student-learning outcome BFA students will compile a professional portfolio of artwork with accompanying resume and artist statement in print and electronic media Evidence that actions are being implemented • Action item: Develop guidelines and a rubric for evaluating artist statements • Developed guidelines for writing an artist statement and a rubric to score the artist statement • Artist statement is now a separate measurement under the new Student Learning Outcome 5: BFA students will reveal on graduation a high level of professionalism • Action item: Require students to purchase a professional quality portfolio case to enhance thevisual presentation • Students purchased professional quality portfolio cases Program Actions Since Last Assessment Presentation: Evidence That Action Is Being Implemented
2009-10 Priority Outcome 1 New Student-Learning Outcomes and Measurements
2009-10 Priority Outcome 1 New Multiple choice exam: design identification Essay: formal analysis Essay: reflection Essay: topic specific Class presentation of design concepts Aggregate mean result = 3.3 (excellent rating) Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Display of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 1 New Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Analysis of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 1 New Action Plan
2009-10 Priority Outcome 2 New Student-Learning Outcomes and Measurements
2009-10 Priority Outcome 2 New Computer literacy: digital portfolio Portfolio review Participation: competitive exhibitions Lecture: public presentation of artwork Aggregate mean result = 3.3 (excellent rating) Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Display of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 2 New Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Analysis of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 2 New Action Plan
2009-10 Priority Outcome 3 Repeated Student-Learning Outcomes and Measurements
2009-10 Priority Outcome 3 Repeated Evaluation: Cameron Art Department Faculty Evaluation: external evaluator Aggregate mean result = 3.6 (excellent rating) Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Display of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 3 Repeated Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Analysis of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 3 Repeated Action Plan