440 likes | 612 Views
The Outcomes Assessment Process Applied to International Students: An Important Yet Undeveloped Tool Fred Hildebrand, SUNY Morrisville and Peter Thomas, System Administration. Stakeholders. Parents Students Administrators Faculty. Natural Sciences. Mathematics Sciences. Social Sciences.
E N D
The Outcomes Assessment Process Applied to International Students: An Important Yet Undeveloped ToolFred Hildebrand, SUNY Morrisville and Peter Thomas, System Administration
Stakeholders • Parents • Students • Administrators • Faculty
Natural Sciences • Mathematics • Sciences
Social Sciences • Sociology • Psychology
History • American History • Western Civilization • Other World Civilization
Humanities • The Arts • Humanities
Languages • Foreign Language • Basic Communication
Competencies • Information Management • Critical Thinking
Purpose of Assessment • Accountability • Improvement
The fact that international students differ from native students leads to the conclusion that outcomes assessments need to be more discretely focused. We seek to answer two questions:
1) What has SUNY done for the student? Adapt Open Doors questions: • Student satisfaction with sojourn • Gains in language proficiency • Academic achievement gains • Gains in personal development • Gains in intercultural proficiency • Career-oriented outcomes
2) What has the student done for SUNY? Institutional impact such as • Curricular reform • Marketing of the institution • Financial effects • Impact on enrollment and retention • Effects on faculty
But … how to get that information from a population of widely varying backgrounds? Many mechanisms exist in the international education sphere, but none is exactly on point.
Various Techniques and Instruments • Bolen – Transnational competencies, plus • Need demographic data baseline – separate experience and background • Add standard demographic measures to filter – Age, Ethnicity, Race, Religion, Semester level, Socioeconomic status, Home city/country • Corbitt – Global Awareness Profile (GAP Test) • Meyers and Kelly – Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory (CCAI) • Bennett – Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI) • Middle States – Broad range of examples
To build an appropriate assessment process, we need to: • Better understand/describe the incoming international student, then • Create a more appropriate assessment mechanism to gauge outcomes
Our selection process for international students is not too different from the generic, and the integration of international students into our mainstream has meant little discrete baseline information
Look to the examples of entities around the world that have addressed the issue of internationalization and analogize Multiple benefits: • Better assessment processes • Well-tuned links with overseas partners • Study Abroad/Exchange • Transfer and Articulation • Middle States overseas initiatives
There are a good number of approaches to explore … Canada CICIC UK Council of Validating Universities US IESMAP WES Middle States EUSocrates/Erasmus Lisbon Credential Recognition ECTS Tuning Program TEEP
Canadian Information Centre for International Credentials (CICIC) • General Guiding Principles for Good Practice in the Assessment of Foreign Credentials • Broadly framed .. Education/jobs/professional practice • Looks into the status of an institution and underlying program as well as the credential
Council of Validating Universities A very comprehensive system in the UK that ensures quality and predictability in the operation of student exchange programs
Institute for the International Education of Students (IES) • IES/MAP – Model Assessment Practice – Developed as a mode of assessing Study Abroad students • International and cross-cultural program components • Three challenges: • Mission/goals per cross cultural learning experience • Non-academic elements • Differing academic cultures • Set of standards for assessment
World Education Services (WES) A very active provider of a range of support services in the admissions and transfer fields
Middle States Increasingly active in the inclusion of overseas universities in the accreditation process, thus building linkages with assessment of learning outcomes
Socrates/Erasmus • Longstanding program supporting/facilitating student and teacher mobility • Full academic recognition agreed before departure • Joint curricula • Joint development of “study programs” • Joint development of “European modules” • Implementation and dissemination of curricular development projects
Linkage with ECTS (especially Learning Agreement) • Thematic Networks – Define and develop a European dimension within a given academic discipline or study area (departments, schools, associations, professional bodies, other partners and student organizations
Lisbon Credential Recognition System • Per Lisbon Convention, parties can create a standardized supplement to a diploma • Easily understandable and correctable data about the person and his/her attainments • Useful for benchmarking
ECTS • Pre-agreed equivalence • Credits based on notional year • Learning Agreement • Nuance-rich vis-à-vis accommodating disparate students
Tuning Program • European program to “tune” education systems • Seven subject areas: Business, Educational Sciences, Geology, History, Math, Physics, Chemistry; 101 university departments in 16 countries • Research on generic and subject-specific skills and competencies • Generic competences comprise: Instrumental, Interpersonal, Systemic • Specific: Skills, Knowledge, Content
Instrumental competences • Capacity for analysis and synthesis • Capacity for organization and planning • Basic general knowledge • Grounding in basic knowledge of the profession • Oral and written communication in your native language • Information management skills (ability to retrieve and analyse information from different sources) • Knowledge of a second language • Elementary computing skills • Problem solving • Decision-making Tuning
Interpersonal competences • Critical and self-critical abilities • Teamwork • Interpersonal skills • Ability to work in an interdisciplinary team • Ability to communicate with experts in other fields • Appreciation of diversity and multicultural aspects • Ability to work in an international context • Ethical commitment Tuning
Systemic competences • Research skills • Capacity to learn • Capacity for applying knowledge in practice • Capacity to adapt to new situations • Capacity for generating new ideas (creativity) • Leadership • Ability to work autonomously • Project design and management • Initiative and entrepreneurial spirit • Concern for quality • Understanding of cultures and customs of other countries • Will to succeed Tuning
Looks at educational structures and content of studies, not educational systems • Methodology is designed to understand curricula and make them comparable (via Learning Outcomes and competences) – described in terms of reference points to be met • The Learning Agreement is the baseline for assessment • Level qualifications have been developed, giving rise to, e.g., the EuroBachelor in Chemistry Tuning
Assessment includes: • Written exams (predominant mode); Oral exams; Lab reports; Problem-solving exercises; Oral presentations; Bachelor’s Thesis Plus • Literature survey and evaluation’ • Collaborative work • “Posters” Tuning
Basic Question: Can a single set of criteria and elements of an assessment system suffice in a multicultural, multinational context, absent special actions, driven by the heterogeneity of the students • Phase 4 is now getting underway. Including the Assessment elements of the Tuning Program, it will be a key mechanism for answering the question Tuning
TEEP Project • Transnational European Evaluation Project (TEEP) • Flows from the Bologna-based European Higher Education Area process; built on the Tuning program • Promoter of Quality Assurance with a view to develop comparable criteria and methodologies • Draws support from the Socrates/Erasmus thematic networks in History, Physics, and Veterinary Science
Seeks to develop a European methodology for the use of common criteria and Quality Assurance at the European level • Develops a transnational external evaluation scheme of program review building on a focus on competences and learning outcomes • Incorporates a self-evaluation process as a starter – plus a site visit TEEP
NEXT STEP …. Increased dialogue and sharing of data/information on international students and the assessment of their performance
CICIC http://www.cicic.ca/indexe.stm CVU http://www.cvu.ac.uk IESMAP http://www.iesabroad.org WES http://www.wes.org/ Middle States http://www.msache.org/ Socrates/Erasmus http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/socrates/socrates_en.html Lisbon Recognition Convention http://www.cepes.ro/information_services/sources/on_line/lisbon.htm ECTS http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/socrates/ects_en.html Tuning Program http://www.relint.deusto.es/TUNINGProject/index.htm TEEP http://www.enqa.net/pubs.lasso