200 likes | 223 Views
The State Board's proposal aims to restore educational funding to 2009 levels adjusted for inflation by 2023, with an additional $90 million per year. Despite some increases, funding is still below 2009 levels when considering inflation. Recommends targeted funding for areas like special education, early childhood, and technology to improve outcomes. Kansas lags behind in educational funding compared to other states. Increased funding crucial for addressing societal expectations, improving student achievement, and overcoming challenges. School costs rising faster than inflation, impacting teacher salaries. Compare with regional and national peers to highlight funding disparities and importance of investment in education. Stay informed with daily KASB News Brief and follow #ksleg and #ksed on Twitter for updates.
E N D
The State Board “inflation adjustment” proposal continues the work of the 2018 Legislature plan to restore constitutional funding at 2009 levels, when adjusted for inflation, by 2023.
Plan adds $90 million per year “on top of” base increases already approved.
After 8 years of basically flat funding, general fund (base aid) LOB and special ed aid is projected to increase nearly $1 billion between 2017 and 2023.
But adjusted for inflation, will likely still be below 2009 level (depending on actual inflation – does not account enrollment growth, student needs, more expectations.
Since 2009, Kansas has fallen behind other states, especially those with highest student outcomes. Proposed funding will help us catch up.
Based on current economic estimates, Kansas will continue to spend less of total taxpayer income on K-12 education than any year from 2000 to 2012.
We know funding supports higher educational attainment because it has in the past – until 2009, Kansas funding consistently increased more than inflation.
We know funding matters because: • Much additional funding has been targeted at higher achievement: special education, early childhood, at-risk, alternative schools; or social concerns like safety, nutrition and technology. • Three Kansas Legislative cost studies based on higher outcomes, as well as national studies. • Comparison with other states. • Cost of proven programs that could be expanded, such as early childhood programs, Jobs for America’s Graduates-Kansas (JAG-K) and the Reading Roadmap. • We know why funding matters: • Society expects more: higher graduation rates, more students successful in college and the workforce, more services, solving social issues. • Achievement isn’t random: students with issues OUTSIDE the school’s control (poverty, disability and mental illness) have lower achievement. • Overcoming those challenges usually takes more resources to make up for resources those students lack. • School costs (salaries, buildings) usually rise faster than inflation.
Kansas schools: achievement and efficiency • Kansas ranks 9th on average 15 national indicators • Every state ranking higher spends more (2016) • Regional ranks: Iowa (#4), Nebraska (#7), North Dakota (#8), Minnesota (#11) all spend more; Missouri (#12) spend $124 less. • Kansas higher than U.S. average on all 15 indicators (spends $1,700 less) • Kansas higher than overall peers on all 15 indicators (spends $838 less) • Kansas higher than student peers on 13 of 15 ($2,982 less) • Kansas higher than adult peers on 14 of 15 ($1,592 less) • Kansas higher than distribution peers all 15 ($45 more)
Kansas teacher salaries falling behind inflation since 2009. Two years of higher funding has helped restore some of that loss. Four more years will go farther.
Daily video wrap-up -Daily KASB News Brief -Twitter #ksleg #ksed @tallman_mark @leahfliter @robgilligan @srothschild1 @KASBTopeka