1 / 33

Maximizing Access to Knowledge for Global Progress

This article discusses the global movement for open access and the impact it has on research citations and knowledge progression. It also highlights the different stages of the research impact cycle and the importance of self-archiving in institutional repositories.

carneya
Download Presentation

Maximizing Access to Knowledge for Global Progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. El movimiento mundial para el acceso libre: Maximizar el acceso al conocimiento para maximizar el progreso de los conocimientos Stevan Harnad Canada Research Chair in Cognitive Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal & Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton

  2. La cola-Editor sacude el perro-Investigación

  3. el acceso libre aumenta las citaciones en todas las disciplinas

  4. New impact cycles:New research builds on existing research Impact cycle begins: Research is done Researchers write pre-refereeing “Pre-Print” 12-18 Months Submitted to Journal Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer-Review” Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal

  5. New impact cycles:New research builds on existing research Impact cycle begins: Research is done Researchers write pre-refereeing “Pre-Print” This limited subscription-based access can be supplemented by self-archiving the Postprint in the author’s own institutional repository as follows: 12-18 Months Submitted to Journal Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer-Review” Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal

  6. Post-Print is self-archived in University’s Eprint Archive More impact cycles: Impact cycle begins: Research is done Researchers write pre-refereeing “Pre-Print” 12-18 Months Submitted to Journal Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer-Review” Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal New impact cycles: New research builds on existing research

  7. 95% de los investigadores en todo el mundo cumplirán a una exigencia de auto-archivar

  8. University of Tasmania +Repository-Incentive -Mandate Green line: total annual output Red line: proportion self-archived Data courtesy of Arthur Sale

  9. University of Queensland+Repository +Incentive-MandateGreen line: total annual outputRed line: proportion self-archived Data courtesy of Arthur Sale

  10. Queensland University of Technology+Repository +Incentive +MandateGreen line: total annual outputRed line: proportion self-archived Data courtesy of Arthur Sale

  11. RAE 2001 Rankings for Psychology

  12. Research Assessment, Research Funding, and Citation Impact “Correlation between RAE ratings and mean departmental citations +0.91 (1996) +0.86 (2001) (Psychology)” “RAE and citation counting measure broadly the same thing” “Citation counting is both more cost-effective and more transparent” (Eysenck & Smith 2002) http://psyserver.pc.rhbnc.ac.uk/citations.pdf

  13. La ventaja competitiva del acceso libre y exigenia a auto-archivar

  14. 91% de las revistas son verdes

  15. Accesso libre: Como? Las universidades obtoptarán la exigencia (DI/AO): Depósito Inmediata + Acceso Opcional + El botón

  16. From: DemoPrints XXX@ecs.soton.ac.uk Date: July 28, 2007 12:51:43 AM EDT (CA) To: XXX@ecs.soton.ac.uk Subject: Request for "Open Access Mandates and Metrics” The following item:Harnad, S (2007) Open Access Mandates and Metrics.Science Editor 5 (2): 500-510. has been requested from DemoPrints by: inewton@cambridge.ac.uk The following reason was given: "Please send me a copy for research purposes. -- I. Newton (Cambridge U)” Please respond by clicking one of the following: Accept the request(click here to email eprint automatically) Reject the request(click here to decline request)

  17. Citations (C) CiteRank Co-citations Downloads (D) C/D Correlations Hub/Authority index Chronometrics: Latency/Longevity Endogamy/Exogamy Book citation index Sample of candidate OA-era metrics: • Research funding • Students • Prizes • h-index • Co-authorships • Number of articles • Number of publishing years • Semiometrics (latent semantic indexing, text overlap, etc.)

  18. El crecimiento de citaciones y telecargas

  19. La exigencia de Harvard: conservar los derechos de autor La exigencia de los National Institutes of Health (NIH): el depósito central La exigencia Depósito Inmediata/Acceso Opcional DI/AO Indicatores métricos EurOpenScholar (EOS) European Universities Association (EUA

  20. AUSTRALIA: IIIIFF AUSTRIA: I BELGIUM: IF BRAZIL: (p) CANADA: F EUROPE: F (ppp) FRANCE: I (p) INDIA: II (p) IRELAND: (p) ITALY: F PORTUGAL: I RUSSIA: I SWITZERLAND: IIF TURKEY: I UK: IIIFFFFFFFFFFFFF US IFF (p) Total 40 (+ 8 prop) INST: 18 (+ 3 inst) FUND: 22 (+ 5 prop) Exigencias de las Instituciones y de los Financiadores

  21. EUROPE [(EUA) 791 universities, 46 countries] UK (3) Brunel ISCM, Southampton ECS, Southampton? BELGIUM (1) Liege FRANCE (1) CNRS Lab PNC [INSERM] PORTUGAL (1) Minho SWITZERLAND (2) Cern Zurich RUSSIA (1) CEM Inst Russian Academy of Sciences TURKEY (1) MET University INDIA (2) Bharathidasan NIT Rourkela US (1) Harvard FAS AUSTRALIA (3) Charles Sturt QUT Tasmania Exigencias institucionales

  22. RESUMEN: AL: cómo? Universidades y subvencionadores exigan a depósitar Depósitardónde? En los repositorios institucionales Depósitarcómo? 6 minutos de pulsaciones de teclado por documento Depósitarqué? La ultima version del autor, revisado por pares Depósitardónde?Justo en el momento en que es aceptada por la revista Optimizing OA Self-Archiving Mandates: What? Where? When? Why? How? http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/136-guid.html

  23. Open Access: Why? • To maximise the uptake, usage, applications and impact of the research output of each university’s research output • To measure and reward the uptake, usage, applications and impact of the research output of each university (research metrics) • To collect, manage and showcase a permanent record of the research output and impact of each university

  24. Para saber más URL (UQAM & Southampton): http://www.crsc.uqam.ca/ http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/ Ventaja de citaciones AL: http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html FAQ sobra el auto-archivagio : http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/ CITEBASE (motor cientométrico):http://citebase.eprints.org/ EPRINTS: http://www.eprints.org/ OA ARCHIVANGELISM: http://openaccess.eprints.org/ ROAR (Directorio de Reposorios):http://roar.eprints.org/ ROARMAP (Directorio de Exigencias Institucionales): http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/ ROMEO/EPRINTS (Directorio de políticas de los editores sobra el auto-archivagio):http://romeo.eprints.org/

More Related