310 likes | 400 Views
A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band. June 2008 By MWG/AWG. Outline. Introduction The “700 MHz Band†in the United States Path Loss Comparison High Mobility Support Based on Doppler Spread
E N D
A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Alternatives for WiMAX Networks with Deployment Scenarios Based on the U.S. 700 MHz Band June 2008 By MWG/AWG
Outline • Introduction • The “700 MHz Band” in the United States • Path Loss Comparison • High Mobility Support Based on Doppler Spread • Coverage and Capacity Simulations • Metropolitan Area Deployment Comparisons • Conclusion
Introduction • Mobile WiMAX Release 1.0 Profiles • 2300 MHz to 3800 MHz • 2500MHz and 3500MHz • Radio and TV broadcasting • 470 MHz to 862 MHz • Comparison of WiMAX Deployments at 700 MHz and 2500 MHz • Range, coverage, capacity , and performance
The “700 MHz Band” in the United States • “Lower” 700 MHz Band in the US
The “700 MHz Band” in the United States • “Upper” 700 MHz Band in the US
Path Loss Comparison • Channel Models • Building and Vehicular Penetration Loss • Other Parameter Differences • System Path Loss Model
Building and Vehicular Penetration Loss • Outdoor measurements were taken on both sides of the street and averaged • Indoor measurements were acquired in the rooms in an ‘X’ manner. • Attenuation for types of buildings, rooms and floors were measured and correlated
Building Penetration Loss in the 900 MHz Band • Buildings were grouped as follows: • High Integrated (HIn) : > 6 floors, sharing walls • High Isolated (HIs) : > 6 floors, non-sharing walls • Low Integrated (LIn) :< 6 floors, sharing walls • Low Isolated (LIs) :< 6 floors, non-sharing walls • Rooms were classified as follows: • Indoor Light (IL) : room with windows to outdoors • Indoor (I) : room without windows, one wall separation • Deep Indoor (DI): Multiple walls • Attenuation increased as you go deeper into the building (IL ~5dB, I~6dB, DI~9dB) • Attenuation penetration decrease for higher floors(~0.8 dB/floor)
Other Parameter Differences • Cable Losses • In 2500MHz band: cable losses from 2dB to 6dB • In 700MHz band: cable losses from 1dB to 3dB
High Mobility Support Based on Doppler Spread • PICI: inter-carrier interference power relative to received signal power • fd: Doppler frequency • Ts: symbol period
Coverage and Capacity Simulations • Compare coverage, interference, and channel capacity performance between 700 MHz and 2500 MHz WiMAX Systems • Simulation time is about 100 seconds, which contain 20,000 5 ms frames
90% of MSs have a DL data subcarrier CINR greater than -4dB in a 2500 MHz system 90%of MSs have a DL data subcarrier CINR greater than 0 dB in the 700 MHz system 700 MHz system achieve greater coverage Coverage Comparison Based on Data CDF Curves
DL MCS (Modulation and coding scheme) usage from QPSK ½ to 64QAM 3/4 Modulation & Coding Scheme Utilization Comparison
User Throughput Distribution 700 MHz system has both higher user throughput and better area coverage
Conclusion • Compared to WiMAX solution in the 2500 MHz frequency band, 700 MHz deployment provide a considerable rage benefit
Comment • Spectrum is limited, and low frequency spectrum is valuable • How to reuse the spectrum is an important issues