ENSO diversity in the GFDL CM2.1 coupled GCM

1. ENSO diversity in the GFDL CM2.1 coupled GCM Andrew Wittenberg NOAA/GFDL

2. GFDL CM2.1 global coupled GCM atmos: 2°x2.5°xL24 finite volume ocean: 1°x1°xL50 MOM4 (1/3° near equator) 2hr coupling; ocean color; no flux adjustments ENSO & tropics rank among top CMIP3 models SI forecasts; parent of GFDL CMIP5 models (ESM2M, ESM2G, CM3, CM2.5) 4000-year pre-industrial control run 1860 atmospheric composition, insolation, land cover 220yr spinup from 20th-century initial conditions big investment: 2 years on 60 processors Delworth et al., Wittenberg et al., Merryfield et al., Joseph & Nigam (JC 2006), Wittenberg (GRL 2009) Zhang et al. (MWR 2007); van Oldenborgh et al. (OS 2005); Guilyardi (CD 2006); Reichler & Kim (BAMS 2008) Kug et al. (JC 2010), Vecchi & Wittenberg (WIREsCC 2010), Collins et al. (Nature Geosci. 2010)

3. What sort of ENSO do we simulate? strong, skewed, long period, eastward propagating (1980s & late 1990s) weak, biennial, “Modoki” (early 1990s & 2000s) regular & westward propagating (1960s & 70s) All from a single run with unchanging forcings!

4. An ENSO continuum WP CT CT WP

5. Composite CM2.1 events (NDJ anomalies) precip SST zonal wind (925mb) heat content (top 300m) Kug et al. (JC 2010)

6. CM2.1 SSTA tendency terms growth via zonal & vertical advection total wmtp uptm hflux evaporation & cloud shading poleward discharge & TC flattening Kug et al. (JC 2010)

7. El Niño SSTA peak vs. longitude of peak ?

8. CM2.1 ENSO peaks vs. calendar month abs(NINO3) > 1 stddev warm events are stronger & rarer than cold events strong warm events peak in SON less synchronization of cold events & weak warm events

9. weak EN, 3yr after strong EN strong EN, 4yr after weak EN ENSO events and their nearest neighbors strong events more isolated

10. Global equatorial SSTAs during El Niño (DJF)

11. Global equatorial precip during El Niño (DJF)

12. Summary 1. CM2.1 (& descendants) a fascinating resource a. Fairly realistic; wide diversity of ENSO behaviors b. Very long simulations 2. A continuum of ENSO behaviors a. Interesting extremes: WP/CT, weak/strong b. Different patterns, teleconnections, mechanisms c. Strong warm events:- SSTAs peak in east Pacific; rainfall/wind anomalies mid-basin- strong Bjerknes/thermocline feedbacks- decay via equatorial discharge d. Weak warm events: - SSTAs peak in the west Pacific; rainfall/wind anomalies confined to west - weak Bjerknes/thermocline feedbacks - decay via air-sea heat fluxes 3. Possible evidence for thresholds or “types” a. Weak warmings peak in west or east, not central Pacific b. SON upwelling might boost sufficiently strong warm events

13. Reserve Slides

14. 20 centuries of simulated NINO3 SSTs annual means & 20yr low-pass Wittenberg (GRL 2009)

15. consistent with Poisson Long-term memory? Distribution of inter-event wait times suggests that NINO3 SSTA might have some memory beyond 5 years. 10% >15yr median 6yr But beyond 10 years? 3822yr / 495 events = 7.7yr mean wait 5-year wait most common Even a purely memoryless ENSO would give occasional waits of 20 years or more, as seen in CM2.1. recharge delay Wittenberg (GRL 2009)‏

16. Best hope for long-term ENSO predictability? NINO3 memory might last 5yr, following strong warm events.

17. Best hope for long-term ENSO predictability? NINO3 memory might last 5yr, following strong warm events.