1 / 33

MANAGEMENT FORUM

MANAGEMENT FORUM. Jim Krupnick Chief Operating Officer July 14, 2009. Topics. Upward Review Mission Readiness Break Forum Future Questions. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Upward Review. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Upward Review. 4.0. 4.0. 4.0. 4.0. 4.0. Comments?.

carsyn
Download Presentation

MANAGEMENT FORUM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MANAGEMENT FORUM Jim Krupnick Chief Operating Officer July 14, 2009

  2. Topics • Upward Review • Mission Readiness • Break • Forum Future • Questions

  3. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Upward Review

  4. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Upward Review

  5. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

  6. Comments?

  7. What is Mission Readiness? Mission readiness is defined as the ability of existing facilities and infrastructure to enable delivery of the science mission.

  8. LBNL Infrastructure is driven by DOE Mission LBNL Science Strategy LBNL Infrastructure and Maintenance DOE Mission and Goals

  9. Mission Readiness Peer ReviewLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory29 June – July 2, 2009 Lynn Eberhardt (ORNL) - Team Lead Chuck Mann (SLAC) Keith McClanahan (Consultant) Liam Robinson (SLAC) Jeff Smith - (ORNL) - COO Participant John Wald (PNNL) Approx. 20 observers, including 3 COO’s

  10. Pre-2005 LBNL ‘Call’ Process for prioritizing allocation of non-capital alteration, GPP, & GPE funds Run and managed by the Facilities Dept, with input from scientific division staff Prioritization and final lists submitted by Facilities Dept Head Approved by Deputy Director for Operations Problems Scientific leadership not actively engaged Process neither open nor visible to most researchers Projects prioritized based partly on relationships (who knew whom) and individual division preferences, rather than the Laboratory’s strategic mission needs

  11. Changes in 2005 New Lab Director (S. Chu) Concerned re level of discretionary $$ available to Laboratory management Principles for new process Managed by Directorate, not Facilities Priorities set and decisions made in an open & transparent manner Actively engage all scientific division directors Final decision making by Lab Leadership

  12. Mission Readiness Lines of Inquiry Process Steps A–F: FY10 UniCall A A A Preliminary List of Priority Candidates Identified Division Directors (research & operations) notified that the annual process to identify project and equipment needs is beginning ALDs and Division Leadership review Mission and Vision Divisions review Mission objectives and identify facilities & infrastructure funding priorities ALDs work with their Divisions to establish the Program Area funding priorities February January December December E Annual Plan drafted B C D D E F SLI & Program Analysis of Candidates See Process Step “B” Analysis of Funding Sources See Process Step “C” ALDs & Divisions Advised on Analysis and Finalize Candidates for Review Priorities for each Program Area reviewed with Laboratory Leadership Laboratory Leadership make funding decisions Maintenance, Alterations, IGPP, & GPE May March - April May June E Division Directors advised. Engineering begins on highest ranked Laboratory Leadership meets to approve Laboratory’s indirect budget for FY10. Possible adjustments to project lists. Consultation with DOE BSO Divisions notified regarding final funding determinations. Results assembled for input into next Annual Plan process Project implementation & equipment purchases begin October August June Ver 1.5 Draft 6 24 09

  13. Mission Readiness Lines of Inquiry Process Steps A–F: FY10 UniCall A A A Initiation Proposals Preliminary List of Priority Candidates Identified Division Directors (research & operations) notified that the annual process to identify project and equipment needs is beginning ALDs and Division Leadership review Mission and Vision Divisions review Mission objectives and identify facilities & infrastructure funding priorities ALDs work with their Divisions to establish the Program Area funding priorities February January December December E Annual Plan drafted B C D D E F SLI & Program Analysis Review & Ranking Analysis of Candidates See Process Step “B” Analysis of Funding Sources See Process Step “C” ALDs & Divisions Advised on Analysis and Finalize Candidates for Review Priorities for each Program Area reviewed with Laboratory Leadership Laboratory Leadership make funding decisions Maintenance, Alterations, IGPP, & GPE May March - April May June Decisions E Division Directors advised. Engineering begins on highest ranked Laboratory Leadership meets to approve Laboratory’s indirect budget for FY10. Possible adjustments to project lists. Consultation with DOE BSO Divisions notified regarding final funding determinations. Results assembled for input into next Annual Plan process Project implementation & equipment purchases begin October August June

  14. “Green Town” A Redevelopment of Old Town

  15. Break • Forum future • Questions

More Related