1 / 26

Loans Management at the Natural History Museum

Loans Management at the Natural History Museum. Dave Smith. UK EMu Users Group Meeting 12-13 th April 2007. Background. Cultural Change at the NHM Implementation of a single centralised Collections Management Database over 3 years- EMu 18 Collections Management Policies BUT

Download Presentation

Loans Management at the Natural History Museum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Loans Management at the Natural History Museum Dave Smith UK EMu Users Group Meeting 12-13th April 2007

  2. Background • Cultural Change at the NHM • Implementation of a single centralised Collections Management Database over 3 years- EMu • 18 Collections Management Policies BUT • Policy implementation 2 years too late….! • Procedures have only just been written.

  3. Exhibitions & Collections Valuation Control Insurance & Indemnity Object Entry Destructive & Invasive Sampling Location & Movement Control Interventive Processes Dispatch & Object Exit Retrospective Documentation Policies influencing Loans Management • LOANS • Research • Exhibition

  4. Key changes • Automation of loan status based on ‘trigger’ fields • Approved borrower relationships within Party Module • Managing diverse items involved in loan process • Valuations of items sent/received on loan • Managing the return of items on loan • Loan Transfers

  5. Loan Status • Automatically changes depending on stage loan process has reached. • Triggered by addition of dates to specific fields:- • Creation date  “Open – Request” • Approved date  “Open – Approved” • Issued date  “Open – Processing” • Dispatched date  “Open – Dispatched” • Returned date  “Open – Returned” • Closed date  “Closed” *

  6. Approved Borrower Relationships • “Only bona fide researchers (in permanent employment) will be granted approved borrower status.” • Approved Borrower = signed up to terms and conditions for borrowing material • Supervised Borrower = students, post docs, retired and honorary staff who request a loan through an approved borrower. • Authorised Signatory = Head of Department / Museum Director/ Guarantor who signs on behalf of the borrowing institute.

  7. Loan Status Loans Module Party Module Exhibition designer Authorised Signatory Requester Head of Dept/ Director Approved Borrower Approved Borrower Permanent researcher None Student/ postdoc. For use by Approved Borrower Relationships

  8. Authorised Signatory Approved Borrower Student 1 Student 2 Loan Agreement Status

  9. Approval Prepare Dispatch Return The Loans Process Request

  10. Request

  11. Approval

  12. Loan dates * * *

  13. Loan dates -Extensions

  14. Managing items • Object Entry items on loan to NHM • Items for which a single Catalogue record exists • Items for which an Accession Catalogue record exists • Items for which an Index Lot record exists • Items which have no data in EMu

  15. Managing items - Catalogued

  16. Managing items – Un-Catalogued

  17. Managing Returns *

  18. Managing Valuations

  19. Managing Transfer of items • Best practice:- • All transfers managed as new loan. • All new borrowers must be Approved Borrowers.

  20. Managing Transfer of items

  21. Exhibitions

  22. Dispatch of items *

  23. Conclusion • This was developed whilst second guessing at procedure. • There may be some future changes depending on what the NHM decides is best practice and how much they differ from the flow built into EMu. • As a loan manager myself, I have a vested interest in this development and I believe that these designs provide a great tool to be able to manage the loans process from request to final return of the items. • It provides a good balance between ease of data entry, whilst observing best practice and being able to comprehensively document the loan, and the people involved, and track their status.

  24. It's too late.....! Conclusions • Any suggestions from the audience……………

  25. Questions?

More Related