260 likes | 286 Views
Explore the complex connection between transportation, land use, environment, and public health discussed at the Lake Arrowhead Symposium in 2005 by Genevieve Giuliano from the University of Southern California.
E N D
Mobile regions, healthy people:Exploring the transportation – land use – environment – public health connection Lake Arrowhead Symposium October 2005 Genevieve Giuliano University of Southern California
Subtitle: The benefits and costs of automobility • Another subtitle: the benefits and costs of cheap transportation • The costs – a long and growing list • The benefits – a list increasingly ignored • Focus on human costs and benefits
Genevieve Giuliano Costs • Congestion • Health effects of pollution • Traffic crashes • Physical activity?
Private Vehicles Source: NPTS/NHTS
LA/OC Urbanized Area Source: Texas Transportation Institute
LA/LB largest container port in US, 5th in world SCAG 2005 State of the Region
Air pollution • Growing recognition of health hazards of small particulates • SCAQMD studies • USC health panel studies • Role of goods movement, international trade • Large increases in truck traffic, port activity • Jurisdiction issues • Increasing marginal costs of emissions reductions
Other problems: PM10 and PM2.5 SCAG 2005 State of the Region
Adverse Health Impacts • USC researchers have discovered: • Deaths increased by up to 17% for each increase of 10 micrograms per cubic meter of PM 2.5 particles. • Deaths from heart disease rose by as much as 39%. • More lung cancer deaths also occurred. • Children near freeways have 89% higher risk of developing asthma
Cancer deaths per 1 million persons Source: SCAQMD MATES II
Clusters of Concern Source: LA Weekly 9/23-29/05
Traffic safety 2004 Source: NTSA 2004 Statistics
Top 10 leading causes of death by age group, 2002 Source: NTSA 2005
Physical Activity • Physical activity “engineered” out of daily life • Fewer high activity jobs • More labor saving devices • More leisure time • More TV and video games • More motorized travel • Shifts in travel significant, but represent small proportion of daily activities
Benefits • Access to….. • jobs, education • preferred housing, neighborhoods, amenities • social networks • health care • consumer goods and services • Transportation as equalizer
Access to jobs • Auto vs transit access to jobs • Studies show transit access much inferior, even in cities with extensive service • Transit travel times • Transit schedule, service mismatches • Spatial mismatch • Patterns of population, job decentralization • Where jobs are vs where workers are • Job mobility • Job turnover • Careers and sequential jobs
Access to housing, neighborhoods • Varied preferences for housing, neighborhoods • Preferences for single family detached • Niche markets • West Hollywood, Santa Monica, San Marino • Community attachment • Attachment to “place” • Social networks • Jobs/housing balance • Longer commutes make possible more preferred job and residence choices • Residential mobility lower than job mobility • Access to parks, recreation, other amenities
Access to social networks • Mobility and well-being among the elderly • Social integration key problem for elderly • Social roles, social networks • Psychological importance of out-of-home activities • Seniors identify mobility as critical element in life satisfaction • Car as freedom, independence, means for mobility • Cessation of driving • Loss of independence, social isolation, reduced access to essential services • Distributed families, friends and cheap air travel
Access to health care • Problems of the uninsured • As more providers avoid treating uninsured, access to healthcare declines • Difficulties in transporting the sick, frail • Transit not an option in an emergency • Problems of the insured • Provider restrictions • Finding the best possible care
Access to consumer goods and services • The poor pay more • Captured markets • Limited variety of food, consumer goods in low income neighborhoods • Living in a “food desert” • Banks and financial services • Competition and scale economies • Target, Wal-Mart not all bad
Transportation as equalizer • Options to address spatial disparities • Disperse the poor among the non-poor • Promote jobs, economic activity in poor, minority areas • Provide transport to overcome spatial segmentation • The first two options face many barriers; transport becomes the default
Conclusion Automobility has large costs and large benefits. The policy challenge is to reduce the costs while preserving the benefits.