1 / 16

Deeper exploration of volume and Jump statistics

This study compares the number of jump days when the volume is high and low in multiple stocks. It also explores the relationship between volume and the day of the week. The results of robust regression analysis are presented along with the number of jumps detected on each day.

catherinehill
Download Presentation

Deeper exploration of volume and Jump statistics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deeper exploration of volume and Jump statistics Pat Amatyakul Econ 201FS 18 March 2009

  2. Last time • Comparing the number of jump days when the volume is high and the number of jump days when the volume is low • Left out a lot of data because only checked whether the day is a jump day and not the z-statistics related to that

  3. This time • Extends to more stocks using 8 minute sampling rates instead of 5 that was used originally -CSCO (April 16,1997-Jan 7, 2009) -GE (April 9,1997-Jan 7, 2009) -IBM (April 9,1997-Jan 7, 2009) -MSFT (April 16,1997-Jan 7, 2009) -PFE (April 9,1997-Jan 7, 2009) • Regress the resulting z-statistics from the BNS jump test with Quadpower Quarticity with daily volume data from google finance • Explore a related topic: how does volume change during each day of the week and see whether there’s any trend to the jump tests

  4. Some observations from literature • If volume is trended over the sampled period, then the result of the price-variability volume can be very misleading (Tauchen and Pitts, 1983) • Average daily trading volume is lowest on Monday, increases monotonically from Monday to Wednesday, and decreases from Wednesday to Friday. (Jain and Joh, 1988)

  5. Volume plots

  6. Volume

  7. Volume (Cont)

  8. Volume trends • Regress daily volume with the index (1st day is 1, 2nd is 2, and so on) to see the trends • VolCSCO(000s)=5.39*10^4-1.16*n • se=(7.16*10^2) (.424) • VolGE(000s)=1.21*10^4+5.99*n • se=(2.73*10^2) (.162) • VolIBM(000s)=7.96*10^3-.585*n • se=(9.85) (.0583) • VolMSFT(000s)=5.58*10^4+.984*n • se=(7.72*10^4) (.457) • VolPFE(000s)=4.63*10^3+1.02*n • se=(2.56*10^2) (.151)

  9. Results of Robust Regression: regressing Zstat values with volume ZstatCSCO=.3661+6.16*10^-4* volume(in millions) se= (.0545) (.0149) p=(~0) (.96) ZstatGE=.6728-5.67*10^-3*volume(in millions) se=(.0358) (.0148) p=(~0) (.7038) ZstatIBM=.4966-3.87*10^-3*volume(in millions) se=(.0550) (.0149) p=(~0) (.7953)

  10. Results of regresssion(cont) ZstatMSFT=.4662+1.28*10^-4*volume(millions) se=(.0613) (.0149) p=(~0) (.9931) ZstatPFE=.6154-5.45*10^-3*volume(millions) se=(.0356) (.0149) p=(~0) (.7141)

  11. Analysis • There seemed to be no conclusive evidence that high volume days are more likely to have jumps, this is contradictory to last time. • Last time I divided days into 3 groups and saw that high volume days have more jumps. A hypothesis is that maybe the jumps occur more frequently at the higher end of the volume spectrum, but not as a whole. • There is a positive relationship for 2 of them, and negative for 3 of them, and none of them are even relatively significant.

  12. Effects of day of the week on volume (this is for CSCO)

  13. Effects of day of the week on Zstat

  14. Number of jumps detected on each day • This is done at the 99% level using BNS test with Quadpower Quarticity • Monday- 22 out of 550 (4.00%) • Tuesday -25 out of 601 (4.16%) • Wednesday -31 out of 604 (5.13%) • Thursday – 21 out of 590 (3.56%) • Friday -25 out of 576 (4.34%) • Overall – 124 out of 2921 (4.25%)

  15. Conclusions • It seems a bit counterintuitive but it seems like a high average z-stat from the BNS jump tests doesn’t translate directly to the number of jumps detected.

  16. Further extensions • Do more research and find more literature that is related • Use other models to detect jumps and compare those to the volume data

More Related