1 / 8

CHI 2004

CHI 2004. Opening Plenary. Jun Rekimoto (Sony Computer Science Laboratories, Inc., Japan) Themes Pick and drop Interacting with public displays Re-defining reality (tangible and intangible). Effects of Instant Messaging on the Management of Multiple Project Trajectories

catori
Download Presentation

CHI 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CHI 2004

  2. Opening Plenary • Jun Rekimoto (Sony Computer Science Laboratories, Inc., Japan) • Themes • Pick and drop • Interacting with public displays • Re-defining reality (tangible and intangible)

  3. Effects of Instant Messaging on the Management of Multiple Project Trajectories S. R. Fussell, S. Kiesler, L. D. Setlock, P. Scupelli (Carnegie Mellon University) S. Weisband (University of Arizona) Page 191 Managing Multiple Tasks

  4. Revealing Delay in Collaborative Environments C. Gutwin (University of Saskatchewan) S. Benford (The University of Nottingham) J. Dyck (University of Saskatchewan) M. Fraser, I. Vaghi, C. Greenhalgh (The University of Nottingham) Remote Collaboration

  5. Mobile Computing • Locating using cell phones 

  6. Workshop on Designing for Reflective Practitioners

  7. Non rationalistic characteristics of design • Multiple points of view (perspectives) • Individuals and communities’ known / own ontology, epistemology, language • Satisficing with multiple stakeholders • Prescription in problem naming / framing • Is design purely subjective(limits of rationalistic approach?) • No: there are limits in design, several alternatives that consequently lead to limited set of solutions • But what are the limiting factors? • Yes: even in engineering settings (like NASA) varied solutions are rationalized post hoc (sort of)

  8. What did we learn in 30 years? • What is the difference between reflecting and (human) “thinking”? • “Software tools / environments for ‘thinking’ users” versus “a critique of AI based environments” • Controversy: can the criticized elements truly be “implemented”? • Science of Design (Simon) v. Science of Designers (Schoen) • Getting “design” back into schools of engineering is an oxymoron • How do we define science? • As in natural science,or • As in Simon’s alternate view • But if science is socially constructed, its definition need not be fixed (may evolve) • Have natural scientists appropriated the term?

More Related