160 likes | 175 Views
This review analyzes the Hungarian budget formulation, parliamentary process, execution, and accounting practices. It highlights problematic institutional features and proposes measures to enhance budget discipline. The importance of multi-year frameworks, expenditure rules, and clear compensation requirements are discussed. The role of the Treasury, debt management agency, and service delivery organizations in budget execution is examined. The need for a well-functioning Supreme Audit Office (SAO) and implementing institutional strengthening measures is emphasized. Overall, the review aims to optimize budget outcomes and accelerate convergence towards EU fiscal standards.
E N D
The Hungarian Budget Review Daniel Bergvall and Ian Hawkesworth Budgeting and Public Expenditures Division
Introduction • Budget formulation • Parliamentary process • Budget execution
Problematic institutionalfeatures • Focus on the actual deficit • Focus on the budget year • No clear rules of budgetary discipline
Focus on actual deficit • Determined by revenue (tax legislation) and expenditure (entitlements + discretionary). Actual deficit is constantly moving • Aiming at specific deficit requires continuing amendments in preparation and execution phases • Hampers orderly decision making process • Forces the government to take pro-cyclical decisions • Suggestion: Fiscal rule • Expenditure rule • Cyclically adjusted deficit rule (less transparent) • Entitlements – in or out
Focus on the budget year • The budget formulation process is focused on the budget year – lacks proper Multi-annual framework • EU convergence program is a de facto framework (flexible) but not implemented at line item level • Budget formulation needs to focus on the whole period in order to optimize results – especially saving plans • Ensure multi-year estimates are in line with the expenditure rule • Alternatives: hectic adjustments as cash limits, across the board cuts and accounting gimmicks
No clear rules of budgetary discipline • More top-down budgeting in Hungary– from totals, chapter to line item • The budget circular should contain the final ceilings • New spending must be contained within the multi-year ceilings • New initiatives in any area during the year need to be costed and fit under the ceilings • Clear rules of compensation requirement, but not a more inflexible system • New rules need explicit endorsement and publication of Hungarian government
Parliamentary process Submitted by September 30th General Debate – amendments (2000) Budget Committee Chapter aggregates decided Debate on appropriations below chapter level - amendments Budget Committee Final vote
Budget execution • Organisation of budget execution • Budget flexibility during budget execution • Service delivery
Organisation of budget execution • Treasury – financial implementation of the budget separated from Ministry of Finance in 1996 • Debt management agency – debt management • STA in Hungarian central bank set up in 1996
Flexibility during budget execution • Reallocation • Central reserve fund • Special reserves • Safety reserve • Saving of unspent appropriations
Service delivery • Organisation of the government sector • Central government - 50% of expenditure • Social security institutions - 25 % of expenditure • Extra Budgetary Funds - 3 % of expenditure • Local governments - 22 % of expenditure • Reduced number of extra-budgetary funds • Introduction of programme review under way • Separation of policy making and policy implementation
Accounting and Auditing Auditing • SAO independent institution reporting to the parliament • Broad mandate – all government expenditure can be audited, including local governments • Audit plan prepared by SAO • 3000 separate audits per year – 60-70 audit reports published • Prepares ex ante report on the Annual Budget Law • Audit Committee and specialised committees discuss the audit reports Accounting • Final accounts bill to parliament before end of August – voted on in November
Summing up • Fiscal slippage • Clear target – EMU accession • Optimism bias • Need for institutional strengthening to enhance budget discipline – fiscal framework and top-down budgeting • Relatively detailed input budget • Well functioning SAO