320 likes | 329 Views
This study explores the solubility of methane in organic emulsions, specifically for the formulation of drilling fluids. The research includes literature review, experimental aspects, results, and conclusions.
E N D
STUDY OF METHANE SOLUBILITY IN ORGANIC EMULSIONS APPLIED TO DRILLING FLUID FORMULATION AND WELL CONTROL Eduardo Monteiro
Outline 1) Introduction 2) Literature Review 3) Experimental Aspects 4) Results 5) Conclusions
1) Introduction Drilling Fluids Functions: . Wellbore cleaning . Cooling and lubrication . Wellbore stability . Hydrostatic pressure Basic Requirements: . Formation damage prevention . Corrosion mitigation . Environmental regulation
Drilling Fluids Liquids Gas-Liquid Mixtures Gases Aerated Water (mostly water) Water Oil Foam (mostly gas) Natural Gas Air • Conventional • Organic 1) Introduction Drilling Fluids Classification:
1) Introduction Drilling Fluids Circulation System:
1) Introduction Kick Undesired influx of fluids from the formation into the wellbore • Conditions: • PBH< PForm • Permeable • formation
1) Introduction Kick Blow Out
1) Introduction Objectives: • Review of the PVT behavior of oil based fluids used in drilling operations (state of the art); • Generation of PVT experimental data for organic emulsions which could be used to feed well control simulation packages; • Modeling of PVT properties and discussion : gas solubility and formation volume factor
2) Literature Review • O’Brien (1981) • Special attention when circulating an oil based drilling fluid because of the high gas solubility • Thomas et al. (1982) • Effects of gas solubility on kick detection . Saturation pressures at 100ºF . Diesel oil and a diesel based drilling fluid
2) Literature Review • O’Bryan et al. (1988) • Experimental study of the effects on solubility . Diesel 2, Conoco LVT, Mentor 28 . 100ºF, 200ºF and 300ºF . 13 ppg, 15.5 ppg and 18 ppg . Additivity hypothesis for solubility in emulsions:
2) Literature Review • O’Bryan et al. (1988) – cont. Methane Solubility in Mentor 28, Brine and Emulsifier
2) Literature Review • O’Bryan et al. (1990) • Effect of gas solubility on pit gain . Methodology for pit gain calculation . Pit gain is 80% smaller for oil based muds . Additivity hypothesis for formation volume factor of emulsions:
2) Literature Review • Berthezene et al. (1999) • Organic oils analysis . Diesel, mineral, olefin and ester . 194ºF . Up to 5,000 psi . Additivity hypothesis for solubility in ester based emulsions
2) Literature Review • Silva et al. (2004) . N-paraffin and Ester . 158ºF and 194ºF
3) Experimental Aspects • Apparatus Components Hg pump PVT cell Gasometer
3) Experimental Aspects • Apparatus Schematic Diagram • Cell Volume = 600 cm³ • Maximum Pressure = 10,000 psi • Maximum Temperature = 356 ºF
3) Experimental Aspects • Operation One more data point!!! Only more 600 hours to finish...
3) Experimental Aspects Procedure • . Liquid admission • . Methane admission • . Heating • . Pb determination • . Differential liberations
3) Experimental Aspects Methodology for Pb determination Bubble point Pressure
P=Pb2 P<Pb1 P>Pb1 Gas Free Gas Liquid Liquid Liquid Hg Hg Hg Hg Hg 3) Experimental Aspects Methodology for Differential Liberation
4) Results Methane + Emulsion: . 3 compositions (OWR: 42/58, 60/40 and 75/25) at 158ºF . 1 composition (OWR: 60/40) at 194ºF . 2 tests for each pair composition-temperature Emulsion
4) Results Oil-Water Ratio Effect: Solubility
4) Results Oil-Water Ratio Effect: Formation Volume Factor
4) Results Oil-Water Ratio Effect: Specific Gravity
4) Results Solubility Modeling
Silva et al. (2004) 4) Results Solubility Modeling . 158ºF RsO-158 . 194ºF RsO-194 . Rsbr: O’Bryan et al. (1988) regressions
Experimental Data: OWR=42/58 OWR=60/40 OWR=75/25 Additivity Hypothesis: OWR=42/58 OWR=60/40 OWR=75/25 4) Results Solubility Modeling
Experimental Data: OWR=60/40 Additivity Hypothesis: OWR=60/40 4) Results Solubility Modeling
Silva et al. (2004) 4) Results Formation Volume Factor Modeling . 158ºF Bo158 . 194ºF Bo194 . Bbr: constant (1 vol/vol)
Experimental Data: OWR=42/58 OWR=60/40 OWR=75/25 Additivity Hypothesis: OWR=42/58 OWR=60/40 OWR=75/25 4) Results Formation Volume Factor Modeling
Experimental Data: OWR=60/40 Additivity Hypothesis: OWR=60/40 4) Results Formation Volume Factor Modeling
5) Conclusions • The oil fraction in the emulsion has shown an important effect on the PVT properties measured; • The comparison among experimental data and predicted results for emulsions showed good agreement for pressures up to 5,000 psia; • The NEW data obtained can be used on well control simulators that handle oil based fluids.