1 / 10

COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009

COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009. Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com. Risk Management Working Group. Extension of CSLA indemnification Three-year extension passed House and sent to Senate Combined Meeting with Space Transp Ops WG

celestyn
Download Presentation

COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COMSTAC Risk Management Working GroupOctober 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance chris.kunstadter@xlgroup.com

  2. Risk Management Working Group • Extension of CSLA indemnification • Three-year extension passed House and sent to Senate Combined Meeting with Space Transp Ops WG • Orbital debris mitigation for upper stages • Current practices and guidelines • Characterization of current environment

  3. Upper Stage Debris RisksNASA’s viewpoint • Debris is not yet imminently catastrophic, but mitigation should be initiated • Without mitigation, risk increases dramatically in the long term • International consensus (USG, NASA, ESA, IADC, UN) exists for the proper disposal of launch vehicle orbital stages • Passivation • Short-term presence in LEO (<25 yrs) and GEO (>235+ km) • Limitation of re-entry risks (casualty ratio: 1 in 10,000) • US launch vehicle operators generally doing a good job in all three areas • Formal evaluations for all commercial missions would be beneficial • Greatest challenge [for US launch vehicles] is the reentry risk for Delta 4 and Atlas 5 orbital stages

  4. Growth of Tracked Object PopulationObjects>5-10 cm Average growth rates: 1961 – 2007: 220 objects/year 2007 – 2009: 2,200 objects/year

  5. Low Earth Orbit Debris Issues • Low earth orbit (LEO) is increasingly used for commercial (and insured) activity • 20 insured commercial satellites (out of >2,000 active satellites) in LEO are insured for $1 billion • Typically commercial imaging (e.g., Digitalglobe, GeoEye), but communications (e.g., Iridium, Globalstar, Orbcomm) is growing • LEO has high spatial density and relative velocity, but “self-cleaning” at lower altitudes • Density is highest between 700 and 900 km

  6. Geostationary Orbit Debris Issues • Most commercial (and insured) communications satellites are in geostationary orbit (GEO) • 150 insured satellites (out of 300 active commercial satellites) are insured for $16 billion • Lower spatial density and relative velocity, but limited area and no “self-cleaning” • Due to “libration points” (points of stable drift orbit), GEO satellites tend to concentrate at 75° east and 105° west longitude if not maintained • ~1,000 tracked objects in GEO, and many more untracked • ~175 tracked objects “trapped” at libration points

  7. Insured Values in GEOIn 10° increments, as of June 1, 2009 ($ millions) Asia/Pacific Americas EMEA L L L = location of libration points (positions of stable drift orbit)

  8. Who’s Doing What? • NASA, ESA – developing guidelines and policy • IADC – inter-governmental co-ordination • UN COPUOS – treaty oversight • USSTRATCOM/JSPOC – tracking objects • Launch vehicle and satellite operators – refining operational procedures • Technical services companies – developing tracking and analysis tools • FAA AST/COMSTAC – investigating effects on commercial space

  9. Space Law and Debris Issues • International space treaties were developed in the ’60s and ’70s, when governments dominated space activity • Saw liability as a citizen of one state being injured by the space activity of another state, and resolving liability issues through diplomatic channels (i.e., state-to-state claims) • Space activity is now heavily commercial • Space treaties facilitate resolution of disputes over liability, but no obligation to go via convention • Issues in the event of a collision between two objects • Determination of cause and proof of liability are difficult • If purchased, first party insurance would typically cover the owner of a damaged satellite for the asset (subject to policy terms) • Loss of revenue, consequential loss, incidental damages, loss of market might be recoverable through other party’s TPL insurance

  10. Q&A • Thank you!

More Related