360 likes | 783 Views
Project Name - Testing Iteration 1 UAT Kick-off. Contents. Iteration 1 Overview. Iteration 1 consists of 43 user stories Out of 43, 17 are functional & 23 are data user stories Campaign type “Auto Pay” would be run as part of the campaign execution process.
E N D
Iteration 1 Overview • Iteration 1 consists of 43 user stories • Out of 43, 17 are functional & 23 are data user stories • Campaign type “Auto Pay” would be run as part of the campaign execution process
CCM Test Metrics / Communications Weekly View • For the foundational release, there are two proposed types of testing communications: • Defect Management Meetings (Dailyat TBD) • Internal Deloitte team meeting • Defect Management Reports (Dailyat TBD ) • Published externally to our clients
Defect Management Meetings • Purpose • Review new defects • Identify appropriate developer for triage • Receive status update on defects in development and defects that failed re-test • Identify next steps to achieve a fix • Determine estimated fix date based on priority / severity • Identify items that are being handed back and forth, requiring escalation to testing leadership • Determine if escalation is needed for high severity or high aging defects, and subsequently work with Test Governance Lead to address • Meeting Format • Facilitator to walk through open defect export from CCM Test project in Quality Center • Defect ID • Severity • Developer Assigned • Status • Summary • Comments • Developers to make real-time updates to defects in Quality Center Required Fields When Opening a Defect • Proposed Facilitator • Defect Managers • Proposed Attendees • Developers • Defect Manager • Test Managers • Test Data Manager • Test Governance Lead (optional) • Proposed Timing • Daily • 1 hour
Indicates step as passed Yes Closes defect Yes Test Test Executes Tester Logs a defect with Executes Case No Case test case supporting details retest Passes ? Assigns defect Passes ? No back to developer group Receives defect assignment Defect Manager Developer Defect Management Process • The defect management process is as follows: Defect Management Process Assigns back to tester Assigns it to Appropriate person Developer fixes the code and assigns it back to defect manager
Iteration 1 UAT Logistics • All test cases should be executed directly into Quality Center • Test cases should not be executed in offline tools and later “mass updated” in Quality Center, as all metrics / reporting will be based real-time out of Quality Center • If you have issues accessing Quality Center, please reach out to Name/Emailto determine an alternate testing approach • Defects should be created directly from failed test steps within test cases and linked accordingly • This will show the correlation between failed test cases and defects • If a test step is Blocked, it should also be linked back to a defect • This will show the correlation between blocked test cases and defects • If there is an environment outage preventing testing, please notify Name / Emailimmediately • Testing resources should follow the guidelines listed in this presentation when it comes to Defect Severity, Test Case Status, processes, etc. • For any issues with accessing and setting up Quality Center, please contact Name / Email • If there are questions about specific processes within Quality Center (what a mandatory / optional field means and how /when it should be used, etc.) testing resources will contact the Testing Lead, Name / Email
Defect Severity Guidelines • Defects will be categorized as follows:
Defect Priority Guidelines • Defects will be categorized as follows:
Test Ground Rules • All test cases should be executed directly into Quality Center • Test cases should not be executed in offline tools and later “mass updated” in Quality Center, as all metrics / reporting will be based real-time out of Quality Center • If you have issues accessing Quality Center, please reach out to Name / Emailto determine an alternate testing approach • Defects should be created directly from failed test steps within test cases and linked accordingly • This will show the correlation between failed test cases and defects • If a test step is Blocked, it should also be linked back to a defect • This will show the correlation between blocked test cases and defects • If there is an environment outage preventing testing, please notify Name / Emailimmediately • Testing resources should follow the guidelines listed in this presentation when it comes to Defect Severity, Test Case Status, processes, etc. • For any issues with accessing and setting up Quality Center, please contact Name / Email • If there are questions about CCM specific processes within Quality Center (what a mandatory / optional field means and how /when it should be used, etc.) testing resources will contact the Testing Lead, Name / Email
Test Progress Example Overall Testing Progress Summary Statement Test Planning - Progress Test Planning - Summary Test Execution - Summary Test Execution - Progress
Defects Summary Example Defects Summary Statement Defects - Progress Defects - Summary
Priority 1 Outstanding Defects Priority 1 Defects Summary Statement
Use Cases Execution Example Use Cases (Requirements) Summary Statement Use Cases - Progress Use Cases - Summary