1 / 24

Metadata Standard Crosswalks

Metadata Standard Crosswalks . 劉仁翔 林黃瑋 王憲章 報告人 : 劉仁翔 97/10/4. Tables. What is Metadata Crosswalks? Different Metadata format Examples of Crosswalks Challenges for Crosswalks Findings & Results References. What is Metadata Crosswalks?.

chandler-ewing
Download Presentation

Metadata Standard Crosswalks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Metadata Standard Crosswalks 劉仁翔 林黃瑋 王憲章 報告人: 劉仁翔 97/10/4

  2. Tables • What is Metadata Crosswalks? • Different Metadata format • Examples of Crosswalks • Challenges for Crosswalks • Findings & Results • References

  3. What is Metadata Crosswalks? • A semantic mapping of metadata elements across metadata schema specifications. Crosswalks permit searching across multiple databases that use different schema. • From: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Miriam A. Drake,P1881. • A crosswalk is a table or chart that shows the relationships and equivalencies (and highlights the inevitable gaps) between two or more metadata formats • From: Introduction to Metadata, Mary S. Woodley,

  4. Demand of Interoperability

  5. Crosswalk Means: • 為因應Metadata Interoperability互通性 ，設計一套對照表，使兩個不同Metadata系統所含項目可對照(Mapping)，維持一致的品質 • 如：USMARC與Dublin Core的對照表，EAD與USMARC的對照表等。 • 透過Crosswalk對照，可在資料庫檢索搜尋到不同的異質資料(如:圖書、藏品、光碟、影音等)

  6. Different Metadata format • 圖書館社群：MARC, MODS • 博物館社群：CDWA, VRA, CIDOC • 檔案館社群：EAD • 政府社群：GILS • 視覺資源社群：VRA Core Categories • 植物標本館社群：HISPID, DarwinCore • 教育社群：IEEE LOM • 音樂社群：SMDL

  7. Crosswalks • 理想的對照應指出三個內涵

  8. http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/crosswalks.htmlhttp://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/crosswalks.html

  9. http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc2dc.html

  10. Challenges for Crosswalks(1) • No two metadata schemes are 100% equivalent 沒有兩種詮釋資料可完全搭配 • “lateral” (one-way) mappings from one scheme to another 具單項性的對照特性 • scheme A to scheme B and from scheme B to scheme A. (見下張)

  11. lateral (one-way) mappings

  12. Challenges for Crosswalks(2) • Problems • one-to-many mapping 一對多的特性 • One scheme may allow an element to be repeated more than once while another only allows that element to appear once with multiple terms in it schema A允許一個元素可以重複，但schemaB元素僅能出現一次 例:DC Creator 可重複出現，MARC主要作者欄僅能出現一次

  13. Challenges for Crosswalks(3) • Schemes may have different data formats (eg: John Doe or Doe, John) 不同的著錄格式 • An element in one scheme may be indexed but the equivalent element in the other scheme is not 選取被索引的元素不同 • Use different controlled vocabularies 使用不同的控制詞彙 • Schemes may change their standards over time 標準的修訂

  14. How to Solve? • Need to Compromise 需要妥協與制定標準 • Here are some standards (資料來源:wikipedia) • MARC to Dublin Core (Library of Congress) http://loc.gov/marc/marc2dc.html • Dublin Core to MARC21 (Library of Congress) http://www.loc.gov/marc/dccross.html • Dublin Core to EAD (Getty) http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/dc_ead.html

  15. Mapping Between Metadata formats (UKOLN) http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/interoperability/ • ONIX to MARC21 (Library of Congress ) http://www.loc.gov/marc/onix2marc.html • TEI header to USMARC http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/tei/tei-marc.html/ • 中央研究院後設資料工作組(數位典藏國家型科技計畫)http://metadata.teldap.tw/standard/standard-frame.html

  16. http://metadata.teldap.tw/project/work-status/NPMqi/npmqi-elements_v1-2.pdfhttp://metadata.teldap.tw/project/work-status/NPMqi/npmqi-elements_v1-2.pdf

  17. http://metadata.teldap.tw/project/work-status/neige/elements.htmlhttp://metadata.teldap.tw/project/work-status/neige/elements.html

  18. Findings & Results(1) • In order to have a useful and good Interoperability Union System (Catalog), We may use Metadata Crosswalks Standard Table to map different types of Metadata schema • Use Crosswalks to maintain “element’s consistency”, and “authority” • Crosswalk Table would not be seen on system,but it’s like a game rule if you want to join

  19. Findings & Results(2) • DC是公認最適合應用在跨知識領域描述格式的對映工作 • 簡單（Simple）：只有15個欄位，廣度夠 • 有修飾詞（Qualifier）：因為欄位會經修正和編碼。 • 易用與易懂的特性 • 簡單的DC紀錄是可以做為建立複雜的詮釋資料之基礎。 • Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI)機構維護

  20. References • Woodley, Mary. (2000). Crosswalks the Path to Universal Access?. In: Baca, M. et al. (2000) Introduction to Metadata: Pathway to Digital Information.http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/path.html • Lois Mai Chan and Marcia Lei Zeng. (2006). Metadata Interoperability and Standardization – A Study of Methodology http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html

  21. Taylor, Arlene. 2004. The organization of information. 2nd ed., Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. P.154  • 中央研究院後設資料工作組(數位典藏國家型科技計畫)http://metadata.teldap.tw/standard/standard-frame.html • 何佳欣、從異質系統的資訊組織模式探討數位圖書館整合檢索之效能—以華文知識入口網為例、中華民國圖書館學會會報75卷(民94)、頁75-93

  22. 柯皓仁、詮釋資料與數位圖書館互通性之探討。大學圖書館5卷1期(民90) 、頁49-78 • 數位典藏國家型科技計畫技術彙編、3-5 從典藏資料交換角度探討後設資料之設計與標準化問題http://www.ndap.org.tw/2_techreport/index.php?pid=41 • 張慧銖、數位環境中機讀編目格式的新面貌—MODS 的產生與發展。國家圖書館館刊95卷2期(民95)頁1-24

  23. 謝謝指教

More Related