1 / 52

Defense Forum: Coalition and Joint Interoperability

Defense Forum: Coalition and Joint Interoperability. Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and Operational Issues. VADM Nancy Brown The Joint Staff (J-6) Moderator. Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems Directorate. Complexities of globalization

channer
Download Presentation

Defense Forum: Coalition and Joint Interoperability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Defense Forum:Coalition and Joint Interoperability Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and Operational Issues

  2. VADM Nancy BrownThe Joint Staff (J-6)Moderator Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems Directorate

  3. Complexities of globalization Resources and infrastructure required to manage and maintain Foreign disclosure COI information separation Current architecture and supporting requirements are currently being piece-mealed vice having a global perspective. Globalization – Community Issue Headquarters UK - PJHQ US Embassy US Embassy Kuwait Qatar US Embassy US Embassy KSA UAE US Embassy US Embassy Oman Egypt SIPRNET US Embassy US Embassy Bahrain Jordan NAVCENT CJTF- Bahrain Gateway Kuwait JTF-SWA TCCC Facilities KSA Bahrain Kuwait KSA Egypt Jordan UAE Oman Qatar Bahrain Coalition Partner Facilities

  4. EXAMPLE Of PROBLEM US to Coalition ATO/ACO/COP Data Flow Shared to Command GCCS US JOC COP Data GCCS TBMCS ATO/ACO SIPR DMZ ATO/ACO Plain Text Coalition GCCS ATO/ACO Plain Text US//Coalition-Exchange E-Mail Server Via JOCS to AOR Coalition - JOCS Limited interoperability frustrates our ability to share information with mission partners

  5. Organizing/integrating construct for IT, NSS, and IT Resource Management Includes the connected people, processes, and equipment to support DoD and Warfighter mission All DoD Components are entities within this environment not pieces, parts, connective tissue or backbone but entities DoD Components must exercise authorities and processes to ensure that this environment is: Interoperable, supportable, enabler of DoD and Warfighter mission success Today’s Global Environment Capability Capability Capability Department Assets Program Program Program Program Program Program IT/NSS Global Information Grid Capabilities Capability Capability Capability Capability Capability Capability Portfolios Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Connected IT/NSS DOTMLPF Programs

  6. Coalition Information Exchange VisionNetwork Enterprise for Seamless Information Sharing Common Suite of Information Services to All Mission Partners with Controlled Access to C2/Intel Applications on a Common Network – Access is Based on Country Trust and User Role US-Mission Partner Environment • E-mail, Web, Service Oriented Architectures (SOAs) • Enterprise Services, Tailorable/User • – Defined/Shareable COP • Comprehensive/Universal Data Standards/Tagging • Event-, Role-, and Content-Based Sharing • Identity Management • Combined Tactics and Procedures

  7. Panel Question? "What are your greatest barriers, challenges or impediments to delivering operational agility?" Our collective efforts are essential to this nation’s ability to enable net-centric forces today and tomorrow

  8. Maj Gen Alan CowlesNational Guard Bureau (J-6) Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems Division

  9. Theater Security Cooperation Physical or Cyber Attack on Homeland Regional Consequence Management (EMAC) Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Overseas Conflict Law Enforcement (MSCLEA) Preemptive and Retaliatory Strikes National Security Special Events Local & State Consequence Management Missile Defense/ Air Sovereignty Local & State Crisis Management 1 Win decisively in one region Border Security Counter Narco- Terrorism Airport Security 2 Swiftly defeat efforts in two regions 4 Deter forward in four critical regions Governor/State Equities 1 Defense of the Homeland Military Civil Operational Title 32 National Interest/Control, Decentralized Execution Homeland Defense in DepthAn Operational Force—A National Asset

  10. A Joint Operational View of all NG IT Attributes AOR-Level Incident-Level GAP Operational Process and Supporting IT Requirements NGB Combatant Commanders (JOC/TNCC) & Interagency Partners GAP JOC/ JCCC STATEGIC ANGOperationsCenter ARNGOperationsCenter GAP State/Territory-Level JFHQ-StateJOC/C4 Management Other StakeholdersOther JFHQ-State FEMA Regional Opns Ctr FBI—State-Level State Agencies Others OPERATIONAL GAP State/Territory EmergencyOperations Center (EOC) Joint Task Force(Title 10/32) GAP Other StakeholdersLocal EOCs Coord Officers(SCO/FCO/DCO) FEMA/FBI—Incident Area Others GAP TACTICAL INCIDENT AREA HLD/DSCA Military Response C2, Info Sharing, Collaboration, and/or Coordination Requirements • National Guard • Active Component • Other RCs GAP Incident Command System Mobile Incident Command Post Civilian Emergency Responders Federal Response Request Active Duty Other RCs

  11. Proposed Capability Delivery Phases TBD TBD TBD TBD JIEE 4.0 JIEE V4.1 JIEE V4.X JIEE V5.0 JIEE V6? June 2007 Event-Driven Database Phase I Phase II Phase III Future Enhancements Event Driven Data Architecture Mission Data linked to Events Situation Reporting Standardized Battle Update Brief AKO Single Sign On / CAC - enabled Web Services Enabled (.NET Platform) Available to Federal and State Mission Partners over AKO. Enhancements Implement formal Configuration Management processes for JIEE and plan for upcoming releases Discover State Interoperability Functional Requirements and Validate Provide enhancements approved by Stakeholders Enhancements Critical State level data integration and interoperability Initial Integrated Portal and GIS Capability based on Requirements Additional Discovery and Analysis of potential requirements • Enhancements • Additional State Interoperability • NG COP Integration • Critical asset tracking • Layer management • DHS Common Operational Database Initial data sharing • TBD TBD Increasing Capabilities

  12. Strategic Information Sharing ChallengesMilitary – Civilian Mission Integration • Coalition Policy / Governance • Enabling a Military-Civilian netcentric environment (coordinate JCCSE Initiative, DoD ISE, PM ISE, DHS HSIN initiatives) • Ensure mission information sharing environment is fully validated from “end to end” and adjust policies as necessary to enable agile coalition environment • Interagency coordination around capability management, leveraging capabilities (e.g., FEMA State Interop Initiative or JIEE use by USNORTHCOM) • Operational Issues • Interagency Information Management (DHS, DOD, NGB) Planning Underway and Draft IM Plan developed • Exercise the IM Plan / Information Sharing Environment and provide feedback to improve IM and synchronize mission essential processes • Operation Control Group (OCG) as interagency group supporting IM evolution

  13. Strategic Information Sharing ChallengesMilitary – Civilian Mission Integration • Developing an HLD/DSCA “Enterprise” Architecture • State and Federal Information Sharing infrastructure to enable interoperability • Coordinate network / IA policies and provisioning of capabilities to support mission integration

  14. We have made great advancements… but we have not reached the end-state…yet.

  15. RDML Kendall CardUS Northern Command (J-6) Director, Command Control Systems

  16. Dimensions of Information Sharing National Guard DHS NORAD-USNORTHCOM Data Tagged Secret NOFORN Secret NOFORN Secret NOFORN Secret Releasable Secret Releasable Secret Releasable Medical Sensitive Medical Sensitive Unclas Unclas Medical Sensitive Unclas FBI FBI Internet Internet FBI Internet Law Enforcement Sensitive Law Enforcement Sensitive Law Enforcement Sensitive US US Other Other Canada Canada Mexico Mexico US Other Canada Mexico TX LA FL FEMA DHS NCS ARNORTH JTF-N JTF-CS Users Registeredand Authorized

  17. What I REALLY need is a …. Centrally managed and funded, redundant, GIG-centric, protected, endurable, survivable system of systems which enables optimal Multinational Information Sharing and cross domain execution, providing enterprise secure access to the edge. ….and World Peace

  18. BG Mark BowmanUS Central Command (J-6) Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems “It takes a Network to defeat a Network”

  19. Challenge • Current multinational information exchange frameworks are cumbersome for the user and increasingly unsupportable for the maintainer • Why? • Current policy requires physically separated networks for each community of interest (COI) and classification domain • Information exchange between these multiple networks induces the requirement for multiple Cross Domain Solutions (CDS)

  20. Impact of Multiple Networks USCENTCOM HQ: 10 different networks Affordable separation technologies are evolving, yet still immature

  21. Cross Domain Solution Process/Standardization Standardization Process 3-13 months 33 Guards inUSCENTCOM AOR Bridging the Information Sharing Gap

  22. Information Sharing Architect • DoD needs a dedicated Information Sharing Architect • The UCDMO construct for information protection is a good start, however…. • A similar organization is required to develop key multinational information exchange requirements and operational architectures • Establish best-of-breed process to “down select” from existing solutions (close fight) • Determine which capabilities are ready for programmatic insertion (near term fight) • Identify capability gaps for the science and technology community to research (deep fight)

  23. Single Policy Framework for Information Separation EAL/SML PL DNI - CIO DOD - CIO SABI UCDMO CDS TSABI • PL – Protection Level • EAL – Evaluation Assurance Level • SML – Strength of Mechanism Level • SABI – Secret and Below Interoperability • TSABI – Top Secret and Below Interoperability • CDS – Cross Domain Solutions

  24. Funding SIPRNET/ REL DMZ CENTRIXS = ? =

  25. Summary Technology Policy Success Architect IncentivizedIndustry Partners Funding

  26. Brig Gen Dave WarnerDefense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Director of C2 Programs, PEO C2C

  27. Tenets of Net-Centric Warfare C2 Apps Core Enterprise Services (NCES) Information Assurance Strategy DoD Net-Centric Data Strategy Global Connectivity (Transformational Communications) Global connectivity, real-time collaboration, and rapid and continuous information exchange 29

  28. Capabilities Required Observe Orient Act Decide Compress and facilitate! • Ability to share, collaborate, and synchronize information with mission partners • Ability to interoperate with and leverage mission partners • Ability to extend MNIS capabilities to mission partners • Resolving non-materiel information sharing approaches is essential regardless of the material approach chosen

  29. Coalition Information Sharing (CIS) Problem(Today – Stove-piped) • Timelines to establish domains are long • Neither Standard nor Transparent • Drives “swivel chair” Gymnastics • Dis-connected National C2 networks • Need to know vs. Obligation to share Physical Netting

  30. Then …December 2004 DISA assume lead for CENTRIXS Began centralizing PACOM and CENTCOM CENTRIXS and Global Griffin Shifting From Regional to Enterprise Focus Now …Since September 2006 • Griffin develops new services to support allied operations • Bi-Lateral CHAT / Web Services • CENTRIXS remains regionally focused, but… • Re-Engineering the larger CENTRIXS networks • Transitioning additional CENTCOM, PACOM and National Enclave services • Mapping regional CENTRIXS networks for the first time • QDR footprint Expansion in five COCOM AORs Next …not your current MNIS PMO • MNIS Objective Capability AoA kick-off September 2007 • Draft AoA to influence POM 10 • JROC submission by Spring 2008 • MNIS Objective Capability ICD expected in December 2007 • CCER Funding Proposal submitted for FY09-11 • Transferring network services to GIG Enterprise Services FY08 • Planning future coalition enterprise services & capabilities

  31. CCER OverviewSpiral 1 COCOM COCOM GCTF COALITION PARTNERS EMBASSIES EMBASSIES Global Counterterrorism Task Force CMIL.MIL Coalition Partners COCOMs COCOM Embassies EMBASSIES CFE Coalition “Four-eyes” Convergence: GCTF & MCFI (Spiral 1) Current What CCER Brings: • Net-Centric approach (Global Enterprise) • Single common coalition network environment (CMIL) • Centralized network management • Common core applications (NCES and NECC) • Ability to quickly build / scale COIs • Ability to seamlessly expand network • Reduces cross domain requirements • Reduces O&M MCFI COALITION PARTNERS Multinational Coalition Forces - Iraq Logical vs. Physical 6

  32. Coalition Info Sharing Roadmap Physical Separation Current - 2009 Hybrid Separation 2010-2012 Logical Separation 2013-2016 PARTIAL ENTERPRISE CENTRIC COCOM/COI CENTRIC ENTERPRISE CENTRIC ExtraNet – Unclass Std, Dev, Test DOD ExtraNet Portal AIS Enables: NECC NCES DISN CFE, ISAF, CNFC, CENTRIXS- J / K, Bi-lats… CENTRIXS Consolidate/ Standardize svcs @ DECCs CCER OBJECTIVE SYSTEM CCER Assess Tech, Dev, Test Griffin Griffin Enterprise Gateways Enterprise CDS CDS Baseline MNIS/AIS AOA Info Sharing I-Plan Coalition IS CONOPS CCER CONOPS CCER Migration Plan PK Enabled

  33. Conclusion • What we need help with from Industry! • Standardized Open Architecture • Data Tagged • IA Built In • Common Solutions

  34. Brig Gen Bradley ButlerHQ Air Force Space Command Director, Logistics and Warfighting Integration Chief Information Officer

  35. Expeditionary Air and Space Force Light Lean Lethal Information is a KEY part of the equation

  36. AFSPC A4/6 Focus Areas JOB #1: Ensure Availability, Sustainability & Integration of ICBM & Space C2 & ISR Systems CIO Better IT Tools (Information/Knowledge) for AFSPC Airmen and Their Families -- Wherever They Live and Work!

  37. JFCC SPACE Integrating and Delivering Space Capabilities and Effects for the Joint and Coalition Warfighters

  38. CDRUSSTRATCOM Coordination & Direct Support THEATER JFACC & DIRSPACEFOR CDR JFCC SPACE JSpOC Director - Target & Assess - Monitor & Redirect - Produce JSTO Strategy Combat Ops Combat Plans ISR - Define Objectives Optimizes Assigned/Attached Space Forces Through the Joint Space Tasking Order (JSTO) Integrated Space Effects Supporting JFC Objectives Joint Space Operations Center

  39. JFCC SPACE Presentation of Forces Thule Clear Fylingdales Landstuhl Oakhanger Prospect Harbor Colorado Springs Stuttgart Camp Roberts Osan Fort Meade Moron Schriever Qatar Point Mugu Fort Detrick Fort Buckner Kaena Pt Stennis Space Center Guam Maui Antigua Kwajalein Cavalier Ascension Diego Garcia Peterson Cheyenne Mtn New Boston Cape Cod Beale Buckley Schriever Onizuka Dahlgren Socorro Vandenberg AF Fence Eglin Holloman Cape Canaveral Patrick Socorro NAVY ARMY AIR FORCE

  40. On Any Given Day… USEUCOM Exercises USNORTHCOM Nuclear Posturing USCENTCOM Hurricane OIF/OEF USPACOM USSOUTHCOM

  41. Space Capabilities: Critical to Military Operations Satellite Communications Position, Navigation & Timing (PNT) • Land, sea & air forces comm • Emergency Action Messages • Unmanned Aerial System Ops • C2 dissemination (CTO) • Theater broadcast • Enroute navigation for all forces • Precision-guided munitions • Personnel & aircraft tracking in support of Combat Search & Rescue (CSAR) • Network timing source • Launch vehicle tracking Environmental Monitoring Missile Warning (MW) • Force protection posturing • Geolocate for attack ops • Cueing data for missile defense • Cueing for CSAR • Mission Planning • Munitions loading decisions • MW conditions assessment • CONUS weather monitoring & forecasting • Solar activity impacts to space operations & communications

  42. Focus Areas/Challenges“Where we need to Improve” Objective 1 (Defend/Augment/Replace) Defensive Counterspace Ops Planning Space Situational Awareness Required SpaceArchitecture Operationally Responsive Space Objective 2 (C2 Relationships) Decide – Observe – Act Construct Global / Regional Aspect of Space Objective 3 (Integrated Operations) Evolution from Big 2 to Big 4 Coalition Operations Objective 4 (Homeland Defense) Space Support to Homeland Defense Space Policy & Rules of Engagement (ROE) Sufficiency of Space Policy & ROE Schriever IV Wargame – “Big Ten” We need to shift from: “Force Enhancement” to “Responsive Force Enhancement” in a “Contested Environment” Gen Bob Kehler AFSPC/CC

  43. Space Situation Awareness (SSA) Spacecraft are now threatened in every orbit, at all altitudes by both Directed Energy and Kinetic Energy weapon systems Current systems are taxed to keep up with space awareness demands Ground-based space surveillance systems Space is no longer a sanctuary; National Space Policy mandates protection of space assets

  44. Space Situation Awareness (SSA) SSA is knowledge of all aspects of space. Achieving it requires: Monitoring U.S. spaceassets, capabilities, and operations Detailedreconnaissanceof space objects of interest Intelligenceon adversary space activities Monitoring and analyzingconditions inthe space environment Surveillanceof all space objects and space activities Conductingintegrated tasking,processing, fusion, analysis, dissemination, archiving

  45. Interoperability--Enablers & Solutions Architectures – Know Roles & Players SOA Framework is key – Universal Core Services Data – Leverage COIs (e.g. SSA COI) What do I need? Who has it? How do I get it? Cross-Domain Sharing Fusion Tools Collaboration Tools Wargaming & Experimentation Integrated space, air & ground capabilities & support for COCOMS Explore Title 50, 10 & 32 policy seams Explore & Tighten Relationships/TTPs JSpOC & NROC JFCC Space & JTF-GNO—e.g. Leverage Transformational Comm Warfighter Focus Always !!! DIRSPACEFOR in COCOMS

  46. Space Impact to Theater“Improving Interoperability” • Increased dependence on space demands increased space integration • More calls for space pros in theater • Tightly integrated day-to-day reachback support • Effects focused operations at tactical space units Detailed, real-time collaboration must occur to ensure dependable and continuous space effects

  47. “Critical Enablers for Joint Warfighting” Space Capabilities/Effects and Warfighting Integration “There’s no GIG (Global Information Grid) Without Space!!” 49

  48. Space-enabled Warfighter

More Related